Cousteau was indeed a great innovator and advocate for global environmental awareness.

However, his venture into an innovative form of wind propulsion, as manifested in his ship, the Alcyone, was based on an entirely different form of wind technology than these 'kite' type systems reported in the above article. The Alcyone used a patented 'Turbosail', which essentially consisted of a fixed rigid tower of ovoid cross-section. There were slots built into portions of the sides of the tower and a large exhaust fan on the top of the tower, which sucked air into the sides of the tower, thus creating a low-pressure zone and also allowing for better vortex shedding. I recall that the slots could be adjusted to accomodate wind strength and direction, thus allowing the thrust of the sail to be shifted without actually moving it.

Evidently, it was a very efficient 'sail', but for various reasons, I think partly having to do with structural problems (a large fixed tower on a ship in a bad storm is subject to tremendous stresses), it never really caught on. Perhaps with some improvements it could get a second life.

In general, while these modern 'sails' could concievably give merchant ships a nice boost of power and help conserve energy, I doubt they could be all that effective other than in sailing pretty much directly downwind, as a large merchant ship running on both propellers and sail power would not be very conducive to tacking, a practice which would both lengthen the distance travelled and increase the duration of the voyage, the latter being a real no-no in these days of just-in-time inventory.

While the article hasn't got the diagram, I bought the times newspaper this morning and it has the 'lift' diagram achieving propulsion to 50deg either side of the headwind, just as a sailboat can tack.

So it doesn't necessarily need an exact wind. Obviously it will lose efficiency at greater incidences to the wind but power from 260Deg is pretty good.

I imagine trans atlantic it might only get it one way!

Marco.

The cost of tacking depends on the price of oil. Of course.

The economics of just in time inventory management rests on the rather small advantages in reduced inventory carrying costs. Accordingly, wouldn't a prediction on the time increase / uncertainty involved in tacking as well as an assumption of the costs of increased transit time be required to test your concept?

Years ago I saw a display at the South Street Seaport in New York that indicated that sailing ships survived well into the 20th Century as guano transports for a number of reasons [square rigged experience for ships masters requirements IIRC] but including the time insensitivity of the cargoes ["sh*t happens"? :<)].

Hello R W Reactionary,

Yep, NPK movement just has to happen fast enough to deliver timeliness for synchronization with optimal planting and fertilization cycles. An ocean crossing by sail can take less time than a normal seed-to-harvest cycle. Of course, a ship arriving too late, or not at all, can cause a Liebig minimum disaster.

Evidently, it was a very efficient 'sail', but for various reasons, I think partly having to do with structural problems (a large fixed tower on a ship in a bad storm is subject to tremendous stresses), it never really caught on. Perhaps with some improvements it could get a second life.

I wonder about the possability of lowering the sail down through the Hull (vertically), during a storm, to be used as a kind of ballast, and the hydrostatic (?) pressures placed on them in that configuration.