Peak Oil Update - December 2007: Production Forecasts and EIA Oil Production Numbers
Posted by Sam Foucher on December 29, 2007 - 1:00pm
Topic: Supply/Production
Tags: ali morteza samsam bakhtiari, bp, chris skrebowski, eia, logistic, loglets, m. king hubbert, oil, rembrandt koppelaar, robelius, update [list all tags]
An update on the latest production numbers from the EIA along with graphs/charts of different oil production forecasts. This post is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Ali Morteza Samsam Bakhtiari who passed away last October.

World oil production (EIA Monthly) for crude oil + NGL. The median forecast is calculated from 13 models that are predicting a peak before 2020 (Bakhtiari, Smith, Staniford, Loglets, Shock model, GBM, ASPO-[70,58,45], Robelius Low/High, HSM). 95% of the predictions sees a production peak between 2008 and 2010 at 77.5 - 85.0 mbpd (The 95% confidence interval is computed using a bootstrap technique). Click to Enlarge.
Executive Summary:
- Monthly production peaks are unchanged:
- All
Liquids:
the peak is
still July 2006 at 85.47 mbpd (revised
0.07 mbpd), the
year to date average production in 2007 (9
months)
is 84.32 mbpd (
0.04 mbpd), down 0.25 mbpd from 2006 for the same period. - Crude Oil
+ NGL:
the peak date remains May 2005
at 82.09 mbpd (unchanged),
the
year to date average production for 2007 (9
months)
is 80.99 mbpd (
0.21 mbpd), down 0.35 mbpd from 2006. - Crude Oil
+ Condensate: the peak date remains May 2005 at 74.30
mbpd (unchanged),
the
year to date average production for 2007 (9
months)
is 73.09 mbpd (
0.14 mbpd), down 0.48 mbpd from 2006. - NGPL:
the peak date is still February 2007 at 8.01 mbpd (
0.02 mbpd),
the
year to date average production for 2007 (9
months)
is 7.90 mbpd (
0.07 mbpd), up 0.13 mbpd from 2006. - Decline in crude oil + condensate continues, however, there is a large increase in crude oil production in September by almost 1 mbpd (largest monthly increase since July 2006). Two thirds of this increase are coming from OPEC. September 2007 estimate for crude oil + condensate is 73.50 mbpd compared to 73.47 mbpd one year ago and 73.92 mbpd two years ago.
- Average forecast: the average forecast for crude oil + NGL based on 13 different projections (Figure above) is showing a kind of production plateau around 81 +/- 4 mbpd with a decline after 2010 +/- 1 year.
Notations:
- mbpd= Million of barrels per day
- Gb= Billion of barrels (109)
- Tb= Trillion of barrels (1012)
- NGPL= Natural Gas Plant Liquids
- CO= Crude Oil + lease condensate
- NGL= Natural Gas Liquids (lease condensate + NGPL)
- URR= Ultimate Recoverable Resource
EIA Last Update (September)
Data sources for the production numbers:
- Production data from BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2006 (Crude oil + NGL).
- EIA data (monthly and annual productions up to February 2007) for crude oil and lease condensate (noted CO) on which I added the NGPL production (noted CO+NGL).
The All liquids peak is still July 2006 at 85.47 mbpd, the year to date average production value in 2007 (9 months) is down from 2006 for all the categories except for NGPL. The peak date for Crude Oil + Cond. remains May 2005 at 74.30 mbpd (see Table I below).

Fig 1.- World production (EIA data). Blue lines and pentagrams are indicating monthly maximum. Monthly data for CO from the EIA. Annual data for NGPL and Other Liquids from 1980 to 2001 have been upsampled to get monthly estimates. Click to Enlarge.
| Category | Sept 2007 | Sept 2006 | Sept 2005 | 12 Months1 | 2007 (9 Months) | 2006 (9 Months) | 2005 (9 Months) | Share | Peak Date | Peak Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Liquids | 84.93 | 84.75 | 84.15 | 84.45 | 84.32 | 84.57 | 84.71 | 100.00% | 2006-07 | 85.47 |
| Crude Oil + NGL | 81.29 | 81.26 | 80.77 | 81.10 | 80.99 | 81.34 | 81.58 | 95.72% | 2005-05 | 82.09 |
| Other Liquids | 3.64 | 3.49 | 3.38 | 3.34 | 3.33 | 3.23 | 3.13 | 4.28% | 2007-07 | 3.81 |
| NGPL | 7.79 | 7.79 | 7.37 | 7.88 | 7.90 | 7.77 | 7.76 | 9.18% | 2007-02 | 8.01 |
| Crude Oil + Condensate | 73.50 | 73.47 | 73.40 | 73.22 | 73.09 | 73.57 | 73.81 | 86.54% | 2005-05 | 74.30 |
| Canadian Tar Sands | 1.30 | 1.22 | 0.98 | 1.34 | 1.40 | 1.07 | 0.91 | 1.53% | 2007-03 | 1.57 |
Business as Usual
- EIA's International Energy Outlook 2006, reference case (Table E4, World Oil Production by Region and Country, Reference Case).
- IEA total liquid demand forecast for 2006 and 2007 (Table1.xls).
- IEA World Energy Outlook 2006 : forecasts for All liquids, CO+NGL and Crude Oil (Table 3.2, p. 94).
- IEA World Energy Outlook 2005 : forecast for All liquids (Table 3.5).
- IEA World Energy Outlook 2004 : forecast for All liquids (Table 2.4).
- A simple demographic model based on the observation that the oil produced per capita has been roughly constant for the last 26 years around 4.4496 barrels/capita/year (Crude Oil + NGL). The world population forecast employed is the UN 2004 Revision Population Database (medium variant).
- CERA forecasts for conventional oil (Crude Oil + Condensate?) and all liquids, believed to be productive capacities (i.e. actual production + spare capacity). The numbers have been derived from Figure 1 in Dave's response to CERA.

Fig 4.- Production forecasts assuming no visible peak. Click to Enlarge.
PeakOilers: Bottom-Up Analysis
- Chris Skrebowski's megaprojects database (see discussion here).
- The ASPO forecast from April newsletter (#76): I took the production numbers for 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2050 and then interpolated the data (spline) for the missing years. I added the previous forecast issued one year and two years ago (newsletter #58 and #46 respectively, in French (sorry about that but the English versions seem to have disappeared)).
- Rembrandt H. E. M. Koppelaar (Oil Supply Analysis 2006 - 2007): "Between 2006 and 2010 nearly 25 mbpd of new production is expected to come on-stream leading to a production (all liquids) level of 93-94 mbpd (91 mbpd for CO+NGL) in 2010 with the incorporation of a decline rate of 4% over present day production".
- Koppelaar Oil Production Outlook 2005-2040 - Foundation Peak Oil Netherlands (November 2005 Edition).
- The WOCAP model from Samsam Bakhtiari (2003). The forecast is for crude oil plus NGL.
- Forecast by Michael Smith (Energy Institute) for CO+NGL, the data have been taken from this chart in this presentation (pdf).
- PhD thesis of Frederik Robelius (2007): Giant Oil Fields - The Highway to Oil: Giant Oil Fields and their Importance for Future Oil Production. The forecasts (low and high) are derived from this chart.
- Forecast by TOD's contributor Ace, details can be found in this post.

Fig 5.- Forecasts by PeakOilers based on bottom-up methodologies. Click to Enlarge.
PeakOilers: Curve Fitting
The following results are based on a linear or non-linear fit of a parametric curve (most often a Logistic curve) directly on the observed production profile:- Professor Kenneth S. Deffeyes forecast (Beyond Oil: The View From Hubbert's Peak): Logistic curve fit applied on crude oil only (plus condensate) with URR= 2013 Gb and peak date around November 24th, 2005.
- Jean Lahèrrere (2005): Peak oil and other peaks, presentation to the CERN meeting, 2005.
- Jean Lahèrrere (2006): When will oil production decline significantly? European Geosciences Union, Vienna, 2006.
- Logistic curves derived from the application of Hubbert Linearization technique by Stuart Staniford (see this post for details).
- Results of the Loglet analysis.
- The Generalized Bass Model (GBM) proposed by Prof. Renato Guseo, I used his most recent paper (GUSEO, R. et al. (2006). World Oil Depletion Models: Price Effects Compared with Strategic or Technological Interventions ; Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (in press).). The GBM is a beautiful model that has been applied in finance and marketing science (see here for some background). The estimation in Guseo's article was based on BP data from 2004 (CO+NGL).
- The so-called shock model proposed by TOD's poster WebHubbleTelescope . You can find a description of his approach on his blog here as well as a review on TOD. The current estimate was done in 2005 based on BP's data (CO+NGL).
- The Hybrid Shock Model is a variant of the shock model described here. The forecast is based on EIA data (up to 2006) for crude oil + condensate, the ASPO backdated disovery curve and assumes no reserve growth and declining new discoveries.

Fig 6.- Forecasts by PeakOilers using curve fitting methodologies. Click to Enlarge.
| Forecast | Date | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2010 | 2015 | Diff2 | Peak Date | Peak Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Liquids | |||||||||
| Observed (All Liquids) | 84.63 | 84.60 | 84.39 | NA | NA | 2006-07 | 85.47 | ||
| IEA (WEO) | 2004 | 82.06 | 83.74 | 85.41 | 90.40 | 98.69 | -1.02 | 2030 | 121.30 |
| IEA (WEO) | 2005 | 84.00 | 85.85 | 87.64 | 92.50 | 99.11 | -3.25 | 2030 | 115.40 |
| Koppelaar | 2005 | 84.06 | 85.78 | 86.61 | 89.21 | 87.98 | -2.22 | 2011 | 89.58 |
| Lahèrrere | 2005 | 83.59 | 84.47 | 85.23 | 86.96 | 87.77 | -0.83 | 2014 | 87.84 |
| EIA (IEO) | 2006 | 82.70 | 84.50 | 86.37 | 91.60 | 98.30 | -1.98 | 2030 | 118.00 |
| IEA (WEO) | 2006 | 83.60 | 85.10 | 86.62 | 91.30 | 99.30 | -2.23 | 2030 | 116.30 |
| CERA1 | 2006 | 87.77 | 89.52 | 91.62 | 97.24 | 104.54 | -7.23 | 2035 | 130.00 |
| Lahèrrere | 2006 | 83.59 | 84.82 | 85.96 | 88.93 | 92.27 | -1.57 | 2018 | 92.99 |
| Smith | 2006 | 85.19 | 87.77 | 90.88 | 98.94 | 98.56 | -6.49 | 2012-05 | 99.83 |
| Crude Oil + NGL | |||||||||
| Observed (EIA) | 81.46 | 81.33 | 81.02 | NA | NA | 2005-05 | 82.09 | ||
| GBM | 2003 | 76.06 | 76.27 | 76.33 | 75.30 | 67.79 | 4.70 | 2007-05 | 76.34 |
| Bakhtiari | 2003 | 80.24 | 80.89 | 80.89 | 77.64 | 69.51 | 0.13 | 2006 | 80.89 |
| ASPO-46 | 2004 | 81.00 | 80.95 | 80.80 | 80.00 | 73.77 | 0.22 | 2005 | 81.00 |
| ASPO-58 | 2005 | 81.00 | 82.03 | 83.10 | 85.00 | 79.18 | -2.08 | 2010 | 85.00 |
| Staniford (High) | 2005 | 77.45 | 77.92 | 78.31 | 79.01 | 78.51 | 2.71 | 2011-10 | 79.08 |
| Staniford (Med) | 2005 | 75.81 | 75.94 | 75.97 | 75.52 | 73.00 | 5.05 | 2007-05 | 75.98 |
| Staniford (Low) | 2005 | 70.46 | 70.13 | 69.71 | 67.92 | 63.40 | 11.32 | 2002-07 | 70.88 |
| IEA (WEO) | 2006 | 80.10 | 81.38 | 82.67 | 86.50 | 92.50 | -1.65 | 2030 | 104.90 |
| Koppelaar | 2006 | 81.76 | 82.31 | 83.68 | 91.00 | NA | -2.65 | 2010 | 91.00 |
| Skrebowski | 2006 | 80.95 | 81.47 | 82.64 | 87.37 | NA | -1.62 | 2010 | 87.97 |
| Smith | 2006 | 80.53 | 82.81 | 85.45 | 91.95 | 88.60 | -4.43 | 2011-02 | 92.31 |
| Loglets | 2006 | 81.12 | 82.14 | 83.02 | 84.65 | 83.26 | -1.99 | 2012-01 | 84.80 |
| ASPO-76 | 2006 | 77.92 | 79.00 | 81.35 | 90.00 | 85.00 | -0.33 | 2010 | 90.00 |
| Robelius Low | 2006 | 81.45 | 82.19 | 82.50 | 81.84 | 72.26 | -1.47 | 2007 | 82.50 |
| Robelius High | 2006 | 81.45 | 84.19 | 86.67 | 93.40 | 92.40 | -5.65 | 2012 | 94.54 |
| Shock Model | 2006 | 80.76 | 80.43 | 80.01 | 78.27 | 73.74 | 1.01 | 2003 | 81.17 |
| Crude Oil + Lease Condensate | |||||||||
| Observed (EIA) | 73.81 | 73.54 | 73.14 | NA | NA | 2005-05 | 74.30 | ||
| ASPO-46 | 2004 | 72.80 | 72.56 | 72.25 | 71.00 | 63.55 | 0.88 | 2005 | 72.80 |
| Deffeyes | 2004 | 69.94 | 69.93 | 69.84 | 69.02 | 65.99 | 3.30 | 2005-12 | 69.95 |
| ASPO-58 | 2005 | 73.00 | 73.80 | 74.65 | 76.00 | 69.50 | -1.51 | 2010 | 76.00 |
| IEA (WEO) | 2006 | 70.80 | 71.78 | 72.77 | 75.70 | 80.30 | 0.37 | 2030 | 89.10 |
| CERA1 | 2006 | 76.49 | 76.89 | 78.60 | 82.29 | 83.83 | -5.47 | 2038 | 97.58 |
| ASPO-76 | 2006 | 71.11 | 72.10 | 73.66 | 78.00 | 72.00 | -0.53 | 2010 | 78.00 |
| HSM | 2007 | NA | 73.56 | 73.53 | 72.82 | 69.53 | -0.39 | 2006 | 73.56 |
| Ace | 2007 | NA | 73.48 | 73.03 | 66.96 | 58.47 | 0.11 | 2006-01 | 73.55 |
Next update probably in March.
Previous Update:
September 2007June 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
OilWatch last issue:




k Nation (Jim Kunstler)






GAIA Host Collective