 | President Bush Questions Saudi Ability to Raise Oil Supply: The ISEOF/TOD Press Release | The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: January 19, 2008 |  |
43 comments on What A Difference Two Years Makes
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
43 comments on What A Difference Two Years Makes
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
Here's the link to the solar heated Canadian village, Drake's Landing.
Col. Drake started this oil thing in Pennsylvania a century and a half ago. Now Drake's Landing using solar heat all winter long, and my efforts...
Best Hopes for the Drakes,
Alan Drake :-)
Storage of solar thermal energy can save a lot of fossil energy over time. A heat pump system could be designed in U.S. homes to store thermal energy during the summer and use that heat during the winter. The heat pump runs more efficiently during the summer and winter saving natural gas and electricity. Using solar thermal collectors, absorption cooling and a fluid source heat pump, most U.S. homes could save a significant amount of money and save a lot of fossil energy every year.
The Drake's Landing solar thermal system would use less energy then the heat pump system for general operation,
Heat pumps still use about 1/4 to 1/6 of the energy to move the energy, but when we reach a point where the grids are extremely expensive, and/or are down more then they are operating, the heat pump system turns into a loss of money, as it would use too much aucillary power to operate.
Or, let's not use ANY external energy to heat and cool. Still have to find a solution for your lights, water and cooking, but that should be simple enough...
http://www.enertia.com/
The problem with these homes? They don't fit into the budget of about 99% of the planet. I do believe people are going to be stealing the concept, though, if the company doesn't make it more readily available.
Brilliant design, all said. My question is whether you can get similar results with logs, natural or hewn?
Cheers
I have heard that argument before, but if your heat store gets down to 80F in February, you do not have much heating without a heat pump. Lots of people live where they have all electric homes and use heat pumps for heating and cooling. The heat pump is more efficient working with 60F fluid than 100F air when cooling. It is also more efficient using 80F fluid for heating than using 30F air. If you have PV panels offsetting the electricity usage, you can do quite well. Solar absorption cooling can take care of a lot of the cooling in many parts of the country and can offset a lot of compression cooling costs during the day. A systems approach needs to provide benefits in more places than Alberta or Phoenix.