125 comments on President Bush Questions Saudi Ability to Raise Oil Supply
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
125 comments on President Bush Questions Saudi Ability to Raise Oil Supply
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
RECESSION!
America is falling apart, it's time to pay for greed, foolishness and aggression.
My prediction is that the USA will eventually divide into two or three smaller countries. Of course, after a period of unrest, riots and perhaps a civil war (Red vs. Blue states).
The two states that have the size, geography and the history to secede would be Texas and California (with or without a few neighbouring states). There is also some sentiment for secession in Vermont, but it is questionable whether DC would let that happen so close by.
Another, more long-term, view says that the fault lines between the nine nations will reassert themselves as the centralizing power of the US wanes.
A little dust up in the 1860s established the precedent that states cannot leave the union unilaterally.
However, there is a little-known (and intentionally not discussed) pathway within the constitution itself to dissolve the union and allow the 50 states to each go their own way.
Article 5 includes a provision that allows 2/3 of the state legislatures to call a constitutional convention; neither the US congress, nor the Prez, nor the Supremes would have any say in this and would be powerless to stop it.
Once a constitutional convention is called, anything is fair game in terms of the amendments that can be proposed. They could even propose an amendment that would effecively terminate the constitution and dissolve the union.
Once such an amendment was proposed to the states, if it were ratified by 3/4 of the states it would become effective. Again, all three branches of the US government are completely bypassed, and are completely powerless to stop it.
There is actually a very good legal precedent for this: the constitutional convention that drafted the present constitution. It was called for the purpose of amending the old Articles of Confederation. It instead proposed scrapping the old Articles and doing something completely different. This is exactly why the delegates to that convention wrote Article 5 the way they did - they wanted to leave open the possibility of doing it again.
Hardly anyone knows about this. It is deliberately not taught in the schools or mentioned in the MSM or by any government official, for obvious reasons. State governors and state legislators probably do know it, though. Should the federal government ever get to the point that it is nothing but dead weight and more trouble than it is worth, you might be surprised how quickly this could all happen. The USA could be dissolved just about as quickly, and just about as surprisingly, as the USSR was.