125 comments on President Bush Questions Saudi Ability to Raise Oil Supply
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
125 comments on President Bush Questions Saudi Ability to Raise Oil Supply
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
- An interview with Stoneleigh - the case for deflation
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Men argue; nature acts.”
—Voltaire
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Ah, the classic "How to lie with statistics" chart. You can make any trend look like any other by manipulating the scales of the chart, to create appearance of a correlation, which is what you have done. It's total junk statistics, and completely meaningless. You lose a lot of credibility by using hoary old tricks like this.
I guess you can always impress some of the more gullible in the audience with charts like this. You should be in marketing!
As I asked you the first time you delivered your ad hominem attack on Khebab and me, precisely how have we provided misleading data?
The original chart was done in early 2006 using Saudi data through 2005, and posted online in the Energy Bulletin.
All that we have done is to add the 2006 and 2007 to date Saudi data to a chart that was done almost two years ago.
So, precisely how have we misled anyone?
BTW, the 2006 chart was just a graphical representation of a point I first made in January, 2006:
Hubbert Linearization Analysis of the Top Three Net Oil Exporters
Posted by Prof. Goose on January 27, 2006
[ED: This is a guest post by westexas...]
i dont see your presentation as misleading at all. the chart is clearly labled top and bottom, left and right. the scales are shifted, but the scales are the same, i.e. 1yr=1yr and 1bpd=1bpd. the magnitude of the quarterly production numbers are not what is important,their relationship to each other is as shown.
that demonstrates us peak was about 1/3 ksa's apparent peak and occures about 33 years earlier.
and as always, the standard disclaimer applies, past performance is no guarantee of future returns.
yes, bobcousins, exactly how is this chart misleading ?