This is the original BBC report from 1986:

The eventual number of people who died in the Lake Nyos gas leak was put at more than 1,700.

Scientists debated the cause of the disaster for some time afterwards.

It was finally concluded that the lake's lower levels had become saturated by carbon dioxide gas (CO2) due to gaseous springs which bubbled up from the extinct volcano beneath.

It is thought that recent high rainfall had displaced the CO2-rich water at the bottom, releasing a massive bubble of carbon dioxide gas from the lake in a natural phenomenon now referred to as "lake overturn".

The heavy gas then sank to the ground and rolled in a cloud several tens of metres deep across the surrounding countryside.

Pipes have now been put in place in Lake Nyos and nearby Lake Monoun to siphon water from the lower layers up to the surface and allow the CO2 at the bottom of the lake to slowly bubble out, preventing a repeat of 1986 tragedy.

Following the Nyos tragedy, a survey was carried out into the CO2 content of other African lakes.

It revealed that Lake Kivu, in Rwanda, is becoming saturated with carbon dioxide just as Lake Nyos was, and is seriously at risk of lake overturn.

Scientists have warned that if nothing is done, millions of people living around Lake Kivu are in danger.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/21/newsid_338000...

This shows how dangerous CO2 storage can become. If this storage were ever done onshore, permanent monitoring ad infinitum would have to be done similar to nuclear dumps. I cannot imagine any EIS would be accepted by a local population once the dangers are known.
NASA climatologist Hansen therefore proposes storage in deep ocean sediments. This means that only coal fired power plants near the coast could have CCS if those suitable sediments were found.

Many earlier CO2 sequestration ideas are being doubted or at least having their potential reevaluated. It's not looking the best. We need to stop digging this hole.

One possible idea is here, brought up also recently in the drumbeat.

http://www.inlander.com/topstory/290133035477934.php

Here preliminary research shows the possibility of underground CO2 conversion to calcium carbonate. It's has a number of people nervous, for the area is just recovering from one government "oops". That oops created the Hanford nuclear "downwinders" of eastern Washington and Idaho.

For additional Lakes Nyos and Kivu information, see:

http://pagesperso-orange.fr/mhalb/nyos/
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/mhalb/kivu/eg/eg_2a_extraction.htm

Here preliminary research shows the possibility of underground CO2 conversion to calcium carbonate. It's has a number of people nervous, for the area is just recovering from one government "oops". That oops created the Hanford nuclear "downwinders" of eastern Washington and Idaho.

I think you're conflating the Hanford project with WPPS (fancifully referred to as WOOPS, since it turned out to be such a massive boondoggle); it was Hanford that released radiation sprinkling it on the downwinders - of which I'm one, about the last batch to get a dose. People where I grew up in Eastern Oregon used to just suddenly up and die for no reason.

I've read about sequestering CO2 in the Columbia River Basalt - fascinating idea. The volcano or volcanoes that created the basalts were utterly awesome in their power - repeatedly flooded everything east of the Cascades, pretty much, about 15 million years back.

No, not confusing. The whoops was whoops, WPPS later changed to Avista, since then becoming a rather decent utility. The oops was the government converup/denial of radiation leakage from Hanford.

One of the dislikes of the sequestration is that once again their "good for nothing" desert has found a use, where they will have many new coal fired power plants to deal with. The coal is imported, the power and dollars are exported, and they are left with the mess, again. Here's hoping the mess really does calcify.

All you have done is to show the danger of CO2 leakage into lakes without annual (temperate zone) turnover.  If the lake turns over every year as the surface goes to freezing and again as it thaws, the buildup will be abated.  Leakage up into land (no storage), flowing water (no buildup), or overturning lakes (no storage) won't have that risk.

I recall reading studies which found that deeply-injected CO2 will tend to form carbonates, which cannot leak.  How much of the CO2 will be chemically bound is open to question, but it appears to be a fact that at least some of it will be.