![]() | The Bullroarer - Wednesday 17 January 2008 | TOD: Australia/New Zealand | The Bullroarer - Saturday 19 January 2008 | ![]() |
User login
Contact
- anz at theoildrum dot com
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
This is the original BBC report from 1986:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/21/newsid_338000...
This shows how dangerous CO2 storage can become. If this storage were ever done onshore, permanent monitoring ad infinitum would have to be done similar to nuclear dumps. I cannot imagine any EIS would be accepted by a local population once the dangers are known.
NASA climatologist Hansen therefore proposes storage in deep ocean sediments. This means that only coal fired power plants near the coast could have CCS if those suitable sediments were found.
Many earlier CO2 sequestration ideas are being doubted or at least having their potential reevaluated. It's not looking the best. We need to stop digging this hole.
One possible idea is here, brought up also recently in the drumbeat.
http://www.inlander.com/topstory/290133035477934.php
Here preliminary research shows the possibility of underground CO2 conversion to calcium carbonate. It's has a number of people nervous, for the area is just recovering from one government "oops". That oops created the Hanford nuclear "downwinders" of eastern Washington and Idaho.
For additional Lakes Nyos and Kivu information, see:
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/mhalb/nyos/
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/mhalb/kivu/eg/eg_2a_extraction.htm
I think you're conflating the Hanford project with WPPS (fancifully referred to as WOOPS, since it turned out to be such a massive boondoggle); it was Hanford that released radiation sprinkling it on the downwinders - of which I'm one, about the last batch to get a dose. People where I grew up in Eastern Oregon used to just suddenly up and die for no reason.
I've read about sequestering CO2 in the Columbia River Basalt - fascinating idea. The volcano or volcanoes that created the basalts were utterly awesome in their power - repeatedly flooded everything east of the Cascades, pretty much, about 15 million years back.
No, not confusing. The whoops was whoops, WPPS later changed to Avista, since then becoming a rather decent utility. The oops was the government converup/denial of radiation leakage from Hanford.
One of the dislikes of the sequestration is that once again their "good for nothing" desert has found a use, where they will have many new coal fired power plants to deal with. The coal is imported, the power and dollars are exported, and they are left with the mess, again. Here's hoping the mess really does calcify.
All you have done is to show the danger of CO2 leakage into lakes without annual (temperate zone) turnover. If the lake turns over every year as the surface goes to freezing and again as it thaws, the buildup will be abated. Leakage up into land (no storage), flowing water (no buildup), or overturning lakes (no storage) won't have that risk.
I recall reading studies which found that deeply-injected CO2 will tend to form carbonates, which cannot leak. How much of the CO2 will be chemically bound is open to question, but it appears to be a fact that at least some of it will be.