My September, 2007 estimate for 2007 Saudi net oil exports (I asssumed a fourth quarter increase in production):

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2975
Declining Net Oil Exports Versus “Near Record High” Crude Oil Inventories: What is going on?
(9/14/07)

The 2005 to 2006 numbers for Saudi Arabia are as follows (exponential increase/decrease per year, EIA, Total Liquids):

Production: -3.7%/year

Consumption: +5.7%/year

Net Exports: -5.5%/year

Extrapolating from year to date numbers, my estimates for 2006 to 2007 Saudi numbers are as follows (I am adding in some increased liquids consumption, because of their ongoing natural gas shortfall):

Production: -5.6%/year

Consumption: +10%/year

Net Exports: -9.5%/year

Hi Westexas,

What do you think will be a realistic world net exports decline rate, once they start to decline?

I am trying to work out what will happen to availability of gasoline and diesel in 'net importer' countries - how quickly it will approach zero.
I am assuming that some uses of a barrel of crude will take priority.
This means that things with high priority take more than their fair share of the declining resource.

ie.: unpolluted fresh water is the greatest need, agriculture next, then military, then hospitals and so on.

I also assume that because world population is growing exponentially so also will the energy (and oil) requirements for fresh water, irrigation, food, fertilizer etc.

The EIA showed a small overall net export decline in 2006, that I strongly suspect accelerated in 2007.

Note that our mathematical ELM showed that its post-peak net exports would only be 10% of post-peak production, with consumption equal to 50% of production at peak.

For the world, perhaps the best way to envision the situation is using an exported production to export ratio (EP/E). Our middle case is that the post-2005 top five net exports would only show cumulative net exports of about 100 Gb, with annual 2005 net exports of about 23 mbpd. In round numbers, the top five are about half of world net exports.

Let's assume the bottom half post-2005 cumulative net exports are on the order of 150 Gb. So, the total post-2005 net exports, based on this assumption and our middle case for the top five, would be about 250 Gb. At the 2005 rate of export, the remaining world net export capacity would be gone in about 15 years. Of course we don't produce or export at maximum capacity and then go to zero in one year, but it does give one a pretty good idea of the problems we are facing with post-2005 net export capacity.

(EP/E)? Is that like a Hubbert linearisation plot?

I am only looking ahead to about 2020, since that is the planning timescale the UK government is using to start to change things like 'new nuclear' and windmills.

Except that it is forward looking. It's analogous to the standard Reserve to Production Ratio.

Back to the ELM:

Production at peak: 2.0 mbpd
Consumption at peak: 1.0 mbpd

Remaining recoverable reserves at peak: 17 Gb
Remaining cumulative net exports at peak: 1.7 Gb

R/P = 17 Gb divided by 0.73Gb/year = 23 years

EP/E = 1.7 Gb divided by 0.365 Gb/year = 4.7 years

Because of declining net exports, ELM hit zero net exports in 9 years.

The top five (middle case) export numbes are as follows:

EP/E = 100 Gb divided 8.4 Gb/year = 12 years

Our middle case shows the top five approaching zero net exports in 26 years (from the 2005 peak).

So, as a mid-case would it be reasonable to expect total world net exports to be reduced by ~50% by 2020 (in 12 years) - that's ~5% a year decline rate (from 46 mbpd in 2005 to 23 mbpd in 2020.)

By 2020 I am expecting world population to be around 7.6 billion, up from 6.6 billion today, a 15% increase overall - not sure yet what percentage it will be for net importer countries.

Sounds reasonable, but a key point to keep in mind is that the year to year net export decline rate starts out slowly, and accelerates with time, but once the decline kicks in, the volumetric decline rate tends to be approximately linear, i.e., close to a fixed rate per year.

So, if the overall world net export decline really kicked in, in 2007, one might expect the decline to be on the order of 1.5 mbpd per year. The 2006 and 2007 data suggest that the top five are dropping at about one mbpd per year in 2006 and 2007.

The one problem (or maybe I should say refinement) with the ELM, is that the indigenous demand is driven by profits from the exported oil. As the amount of exported oil decreases, the consumption growth -and possibly consumption itself should be affected. Of course higher per unit price might delay this effect. Two more complicating obvious factors exist. If an oil exporting country is smart they won't subsidise local consumption, as local consumption decreases export revenues. Also if the oil exporters SWF does well that can become a major source of funds for domestic consumption.

Who really knows what the future will be?

I would like to know what it can't be - that eliminates some scenarios maybe.

My opinion is that any exporter would not be sensible to export more than is required to balance their imports - they need their oil to last as long as possible.

So, that does not necessarily mean growth of exports of crude oil will continue to be as the importers require for their BAU.

For all the reasons you have mentioned what the future will not include is exponentially increasing population. The peak is now. A very short plateau if there is a plateau at all.

The Saudis' strategy is eminently shrewd. Take away more of Big Oil's value stream, capture those extra tens of billions of dollars in chemicals, refining and plastics profit for itself, and thus extend and expand the life of its cash cow. Kuwait, Qatar and the UAE are doing the same in chemicals and refining. Russia and Kazakhstan are as well in terms of attempting to capture pieces of Europe's downstream power and refining sectors.

In the big picture, it fits into the thesis of Paul Kennedy's classic Rise and Fall of Great Powers: They are rising, we are falling.

Steve LeVine, author
The Oil and the Glory
http://www.oilandglory.com

I agree 100%.

Suadi's ARAMCO bought GE's plastics division a year ago to fit this goal of controlling the market of materials and products made from oil. Much of this internal consumption in the coming years will be for the production of things made from oil. Another industry thus lost by the US and handed over to an oil rich country.

I think Saudi Arabia's move to diversify into industries like plastics and fertilizer is not just a unilateral move on their part; the U.S. companies in these industries are looking to move their plants to where natural gas and oil are still relatively plentiful and cheap. North America is running low on natural gas; these industries can't get cheap gas here anymore. It's a lot cheaper to move the plant to where the gas is, than try to bring LNG here.

Big deal; they'll be lucky to last 10 years like this. A massively overgrown youthful population in the middle of a desert totally dependent on a depleting resource? I don't envy them their oil and I don't see how they expect to maintain this transitory state for long at all.

what the future will not include is exponentially increasing population. The peak is now.

You may well be correct, I agree it will happen eventually, but will it be in the next 12 years (the planning outlook period for my government) - it is not clear how soon 'peak sapiens' could be, for food and water reasons. At the moment it is all down to guesses and opinions - the reason I am asking these questions is to try and see what 'can't-possibly-be' in a bit more detail - what is the best case?

I think, for a while at least, fresh water and agriculture will, if at all possible, get all the liquid fuels and chemicals they need - whereas aviation and long range tourism, as an example, will be at the bottom of the list of people to get adequate supplies of oil.

From the EIA statistics almost every 'net exporting' country is already showing the ELM effect, which is bad enough for 'net importers' (especially those that import close to 100% of their needs!), but then add in the fact that certain parts of the struggling economy will get more than their fair share ... hmmmmm!

I also think that some areas of the world can be self-sufficient in food for quite a while, just like some nations can be self-sufficient in fossil fuels for quite a while.

For all the things that are going to peak, we won't peak everywhere in the world simmultaneously - the trick will be to avoid as many as possible of the peaks coming to a place near you soon!

There are already several countries in the world who are post 'peak oil', watch and learn what the failure modes are - then maybe you will have a viable plan B when it happens to you?

Upthread you mention a guesstimate of 7.6 billion by 2020. So far as I can tell no government anywhere is making preparations to feed 7.6 billion mouths. There are no preparations to make.

I suppose theoretically it would be possible if we ate drastically less meat, if the weather always cooperated, if if if. Do you expect that will happen? Do you think it could happen? No one here knows the future, you just asked what possibilities could be eliminated and my guess is that further population growth is about the least likely event you might plan for.

Or, to extend your comment to a more general truth:

"no government anywhere is making preparations"

France may be going 15 kph in the right direction, when they should be doing 125 kph, but I think thye (and Switzerland) can be said to be making preparations.

On 1/1/06, President Chirac announced plans to electrify "every meter" of the French rail system and "burn not one drop of oil"when completed in 20 years.

In November of last year rent-a-bikes were brought to several mid-size cities. (First half hour free). And the numbers are increasing rapidly in Paris etc.

France has just started work on a new generation of nuclear reactors.

A second Phase of TGV building has been announced (a multi-decade effort) as the last leg of the first phase nears completion after almost 30 years.

France plans for 1,500 km of new Urban Rail (in the next decade ?)

Speeding up existing programs is a much easier, and faster, than starting from scratch.

Their plans may not be fast enough, but they have been working steadily on this for several decades (one could say since 1973) and have a lot already in operation.

Best Hopes for the Prepared,

Alan

Yes, France is doing all that.

France doesn't control the weather and France's agricultural output is both sporadic and very much at risk.

France has had it's neck out for years supporting small farmers and local production and it doesn't feed 7,6 billion. Southern France is drying out, the forests are burning and no matter how much one admires France there is just no direction they could take that addresses the problem.

Switzerland is in decline. Their environment is being trashed by GW. Tourism needs oil, tourism needs snow. Switzerland may survive in some form but it won't be pretty.

WT where and when are you talking in Scottsdale?
Geoff

It's a private gig sponsored by Casey Research:

http://www.caseyresearch.com/

You can contact them for details.

thx WT I will try and catch them on Monday. Love the work you and everyone puts together on this site.
I am active with ASEA (Arizona Solar Energy Association) out here in Phoenix and ff gets one session every year at our monthly talks.
Cheers

Hi Peaking in Phoenix
Please send me an email if you would like to help deploy solar powered mobility networks in Tucson. Solar collectors 3 km long and 2 meters wide to provide a Horizontal-Elevator through a retirement community and two shopping areas. bill.james@jpods.com

We would love to have participation from the ASEA. Bill

Amid a forest of cranes, towers and beams rising from the desert, more than 38,000 workers from China, India, Turkey and beyond have been toiling for two years in unforgiving conditions…

Wait a minute, wait a minute, doesn’t Saudi have one of the highest unemployment rates in the world?

Current unemployment is an estimated at 30 per cent for men and 90 per cent for women, and increasing at alarming rates. Forty per cent of the population is younger than 15 years old.

And with 40 percent of the population under 15, it is going to get a lot worse. So why are they still importing massive amounts of foreign nationals to do their work?

Well I lived there for five years and I know the answer very well. Also I have a relative who has been there for the last 17 years and we talk about that exact problem often. Well, more correctly we laugh about the problem often. He, this relative, is part of the “Saudiazation” effort. That is the effort to transfer Aramco jobs from foreign nationals to Saudi citizens. Needles to say it is not going very well.

Why? Well last time I talked about that on this list I got slammed because of my “political incorrectness”. I will just say that their culture simply does not allow it and will never allow it until their culture changes dramatically. Culture simply does not change that dramatically, not in just a few years anyway. And in Saudi culture is everything.

Ron Patterson

Let me guess.... they pray too much.

Cryptex, I posed a question and then answered it, I thought ,very effectively.

The point is culture is a very charged subject. You can talk about culture all you wish as long as you talk about the positive things about a culture. But just mention a few very pernicious things about a particular culture and you will immediately be slammed as a racist or worse.

So Cryptex, if you did not like my answer, and I did give an answer, please tell me what you dislike about it rather than giving such a sarcastic reply as you did. After all, it is a very serious question and deserves to be treated as such.

By the way, where can a woman get lashed because she was a rape victim?

Ron Patterson

The details are little vague, but my recollection is that there was a notorious incident during the 1990/1991 Persian Gulf War in which a Kuwaiti princeling was partying in London and allegedly stated that he was having a good time while his American slaves took Kuwait back from Hussein.

Actually, to say that most Saudis don't choose to work doesn't have to be perceived as pernicious. It just is. Our culture is so much into the protestant ethic that we tend to perceive the situation in an extremely negative light. When the oil runs out, their culture may have to change somewhat unless they have had the foresight to make other arrangements.

I've been pondering just this issue through the morning today. We, as a society, are going to have to come up with some positive meme associated with working less. Men in our culture draw so much self worth from what they do for work that I think we're going to have huge troubles when whole sectors just vanished.

Are we a "semi retired society" ? Is there another way to say it?

This will only work if we're all in the same boat and we find positive, low energy activities to fill our time ... I'm thinking kids at the park with dad as I write that :-)

Full-retarded society on the verge of becoming semi-retired.

Yes it's insane how so many find self-worth and personality from what they do. It's as if they didn't exist without their jobs. Hollow shells.

Criticize it all you want, but its a fact here - those of us who go standing up define ourselves by our occupation. I've been doing a little experiment in this area over the last seven years or so. People say "What do you do?" and I dodge in various fashions, testing their reaction. Some times I'll deadpan "I'm a bank robber." Other times I'll talk about hobbies or other interests. When I was still married my status conscious state university business college assistant dean ex wife and I would be at functions and when people asked I'd say "Oh, I work for a little communications company." She'd invariably have to chime in about the fact that I'd provided the startup funding and that I was the architect for the operation.

Its all a question of focus. I'd like to see this wind to ammonia thing go here, producing a clutch of local jobs and perhaps even funding my extravagant lifestyle (hot showers in the morning!) so when I get that question now I say "I'm a wind energy developer", despite the fact that 100% of my income over the last decade has been network infrastructure and related activities.

Despite my tendency toward feminazi snark, I reallize that our infrastructure was the hard work of mostly male hands.
Work isn't bad, but the endless persuit of stuff and status can blind both men and women to other values.

I don't get why people seem to think that having less oil to work for us will lead to more leisure. Of course, self definition is a slippery thing, I'm clear a mother and a housewife, but I could say I'm a writer (I have been paid for that) or a watercolorist (I do that a lot) or a technical support person (I've done it and I'd like to do it again)

Even within paid jobs, husband says sometimes that he's a statistician and other times that he's an epidemologist. Both are aqccurate and less inflamatory than saying he's a Republican and an environmentalist (again both true)

Americans are, on the whole, not very 'street smart'. Consequently, Americans are not very good at getting up every morning, walking down the road, seeing an opportunity to make a buck and taking advantage of it. For too long many Americans have been accustomed to being employed at a 'job' that requires no thought outside the knowledge needed to perform their assigned tasks at 'their job'. Average Americans have left the hustling to an 'enterprenurial class' or 'business class'.

A wake up call is coming. Average Americans are going to find opportunities in trade, short term or 'odd' jobs, repair work, service work performed for those that still have something of value, and a zillion other niche areas. There is nothing like being cast upon ones own wits to bring life into very sharp focus. Who knows, maybe the guy that has been putting lug nuts on new cars for umpteen years will find being left to his own devices to hustle a living will make him feel 'alive' again.

In the early post-peak years the need for manual labor to build new non-oil infrastructure combined with the collapse of many other areas of the economy will drive a lot of people toward much harder work than whatever they are doing now.

Picture motor home designers, SUV design engineers, SUV salesmen, boat mechanics, lawyers, manicurists, social workers, and assorted other people working instead:

- in wind turbine factories,
- as wind turbine installers,
- as solar panel installers,
- as insulation installers,
- as bicycle repairmen,
- as scooter repairmen,
- as nuclear power plant welders,
- and other occupations in the non-fossil fuels energy industries.

In the same vein such beliefs contribute on some level to the way we tend to look down on Europeans, who get months of vacation time and actually use it. We think there's something inherently wrong with that. I know people who get 3 weeks vacation a year and are loathe to use it.

If TSHTF here there are many deeply ingrained American cultural tenets that have been in place for generations and they will be a high hurdle to get across. Happy Motoring is only one of them. When the core belief system of a nation has been in place for generations, and is threatened by forces and events beyond our control and borders, denial and anger are sure to play big parts in the denouement.

We forget that these sacred American tenets have not been in place for many generations, but perhaps two generations. We didn't start the happy motoring really until the 1950's. The freeway system started in the late 1950's. I grew up in a one car family until about 1966. My father took the bus to work at the University rather than deal with an onerous parking situation. These cherished beliefs will probably not be easily surrendered, but we may adapt better than we think.

Actually, to say that most Saudis don't choose to work doesn't have to be perceived as pernicious.

Not "choosing" to work is not pernicious only if you are able to leech a living from others. Work is what earns your daily bread and unless you have some method of getting bread without working for it, you will simply starve.

But you guys are trying to make it far simpler than it really is. Except for a few date farmers around the oasis Saudis never farmed. They were either Bedouins or merchants. They were primarily camel herders but also had many goats and even a few horses. The Bedouin class was the highest class and they did not regard herding as working. (Though by any stretch of the imagination it really was.) What they did not do is manual labor.

What most people do not realize is that there is a whole segment of Saudi society that is truly poor. I mean poor and hungry. When I was there in the early 80’s there were only about 7 million native Saudis. Now there are over 20 million. When I was there it was common to see women begging in the streets. They were mostly widows or older women that never married. I assume that today the problem is much worse. I also saw a lot of Saudi men trying to sell trinkets in parking lots.

By the way, there is no such thing as life insurance in Saudi. They consider it “making a wager against the will of Allah.”

Ron Patterson

There are probably 20 million people in the U.S. that believe natural disasters, like Katrina, are visited on us by a vengeful God to punish us for not adhering to "the book". The good news is they constitute less than 10% of our population. The better news is they don't have enough votes to put the Huckster in the White House.

As for Saudi, do the dirt-poor share the disdain for work, or is there a shortage of opportunity? I would think they are not qualified for a lot of the work mentioned above due to a lack of education and experience. Lots of poor disaffected people with very dismal prospects whose government is run by ultra-rich royalty living lavish lifestyles sounds like the perfect breeding ground for, well, malcontents and terrorists. People with real grievances who lash out and latch onto whatever "the cause" is because it gives them something to live for, even if that something is infamy. They're very susceptible to brainwashing. But then again, those factors are not widespread in America but we have plenty of our own brainwashed masses here, too. They're just brainwashed by different people for different purposes.

As for Saudi, do the dirt-poor share the disdain for work, or is there a shortage of opportunity? I would think they are not qualified for a lot of the work mentioned above due to a lack of education and experience.

That is a typical comment from someone who hasn't a clue as to what Saudi society is like. There is no shortage of opportunity or shortage of qualifications for the vast majority of jobs that Saudis refuse to do. Perhaps nine out of ten expatriate jobs in Saudi are menial labor jobs. They are filled by Bangladeshis, Filipinas, Indians, Yemenis, Pakistanis and people from several other countries.

There are perhaps four to five million such jobs filled by these foreign nationals. ANY Saudi could easily do any of them. But they will not, their culture simply does not permit it.

And as far as technical jobs go, there are perhaps half a million such jobs filled by foreign nationals. Some Saudis fill these jobs very well. Others could fill even more but there is the problem of Wasta: The Hidden Force in Middle Eastern Society. That is people with wasta get promoted and those without wasta do not get promoted. Skill and competence have absolutely nothing to do whit who gets promoted, only wasta matters. As a result most of the technical jobs available are filled with incompetent people and the competent people never get promoted.

Ron Patterson

As usual , all the world is here:

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sa.html...

About 21 million native population and over 5 million expatriates.

A very young population as well.

About 21 million native population and over 5 million expatriates.

Right, and only perhaps half a million of the jobs filled by expatriates are highly technical jobs. The rest are labor jobs that any Saudi could do, or learn to do in a few days. Saudi could put a huge dent in its 30% unemployment if only they would do manual labor. But of course no Saudi would work for the wages paid to most of those expatriates.

Ron P.

But of course no Saudi would work for the wages paid to most of those expatriates.

Now is an 'unwillingness to work' for 'such wages' a cultural or simply an economic issue?

Thanks, Ron. I think it is important to note cultural differences when discussing any aspect of life/work/politics/etc... in other countries. We would be foolish to view the world through our own eyes only.

"......competent people never get promoted"

bush must have an excess of wasta. we can probably conclude that he is a wastasavant.

a true wastafarian, he is ...

or a wastawabbit, whatever that is

As a result most of the technical jobs available are filled with incompetent people and the competent people never get promoted

Whereas in the USA, when it comes to management or politics this never happens.

/sarcanol

You didn't answer it at all. You hinted at an answer but I have no idea what you're talking about since I did not see whatever comment you alluded to that resulted in what you perceive to be backlash for not being politically correct. Whatever. My sarcastic tone was fueled by my perception of whining on your part. A faulty perception, perhaps, but there it is.

Your "answer" that the culture will not allow change until the culture allows change is nonsense. It might make sense to you but for those of us without the benefit of context, it's gibberish. You know that I know that you know that I know that you know that I know that you know what I'm talking about.

I explained it above, read it. I cannot however explain Saudi culture. Culture is not something that lends itself to simple explanation.

Too many people judge other cultures in the same light as their own culture. That is a serious mistake. Westerners simply do not understand the importance of social position in Arab cultures. Most Saudis would rather die than be seen doing manual labor. True, a tiny few are not so proud but most are. A Saudi would rather drive ten miles on a flat rather than change it himself. "Let a Yemeni do it" would be his reply. Westerners do not understand the importance of "saving face" and they sure as hell do not understand wasta.

A side note. I found it curious that Yemenis were regarded as the lowest of the low by the Saudis. Even though the Yemenis are also Moslems that seemed to make no difference. Even Christian Filipinas were treated better in Saudi than Yemenis.

Ron

In the UK we have an expression - 'only fools and horses work!'

KSA is very hot - best to leave the physical work to the slaves and expats.

You may be on to something. Historically slavery and slave labour flourished in hot climes. Arabia, ancient Greece, Rome, Africa, the US South etc. Working was so unpleasent in the heat you had to force other people to do it.

So was it the Saudis or Noel Coward who said that 'Mad Dogs and Englishmen go out in the Midday Sun' ?

Probably the Saudis. My mobile phone only worked outside in Riyadh last time I was there - have you ever had to conduct a meeting in 50 degree C heat and no shade? Not good for an Englishman used to 10 degrees C I can tell you!

For whatever reason, the Saudis choose not to work and apparently feel it is beneath them to work. I don't think this is necessarily a value judgement; it is just a fact. Given a history of seemingly unlimited wealth garnered with a relatively small effort, and seeing that this has become a fact for generations, I would think that any "culture", even one with a protestant ethic type history would soon come to the position that working is just plain stupid. I don't have a problem with that. Compared to most jobs, there are much better things to do with your time than work for a living. If you can get other people to do the heavy lifting without putting them into slavery, then go for it.

Work is way overrated, especially in our culture. Remember when Bush praised that woman who was forced to work three jobs to take care of her family? Uniquely American, he said. What an ass.

Adam Smith envisioned a life that would include more leisure because of the invisible hand and technological advancements. It never happened. Too bad, because this is the greatest source of our destruction of the environment and the hastening of the day of peak oil and beyond.

Too bad, though, that the Saudis' culture apparently includes the need to have lots of children. Much like the Mormons. More rights for women, I presume, would help this situation.

The US also uses the argument that "there are certain jobs Americans are not willing to do" - i.e. farm workers, hotel maids, etc.

Just the way Americans like Mexicans to do the difficult/unpleasant and poorly paid jobs in construction, restaurants and farming, the Saudis like foreigners to do the difficult/unpleasant jobs in construction, oil etc.

The Saudis are descendants of a long line of traders and desert-pirates. The whole idea of getting told by a superior what to do is anathema. Anyone who has lived there will have noticed that they don't mind driving for a living - though most taxi drivers are Yemanis!

The Saudis are descendants of a long line of traders and desert-pirates. The whole idea of getting told by a superior what to do is anathema.

Nicely put, and more power to them! And this attitude has (literally) Classical antecedents in our own culture ... there is a Socratic dialogue where Socrates suggests that one of his old mates takes a job as a farm overseer, to which the man replies 'I just couldn't stand being a slave.' Yes, for the Greeks taking paid employment was about the same thing as being a slave ... you can see why we don't consider those people amongst our greatest intellectual forebears for nothing!

The Greeks knew that only saps work for a living, and we know it too, in our heart of hearts. In fact, despite our supposed Protestant work ethic BS, we lionize people that don't work. Donald Trump works? Get real. It was correct for the Saudis to draw a distinction between herding and working. We make similar distinctions ourselves, as do all other cultures. There is no such thing as 'work' in the simple sense, and historically 'work' has generally been despised. The whole idea of 'being someone' is to get some other sucker to do the 'work'. Even (hell, especially) Americans should understand that.

'WORK' IS FOR SAPS.

So congratulations, Darwinian. You've just converted the whole TOD community to closet admirers of Saudi Arabia ... perhaps not what you intended with that post, huh?

Americans who want to import and hire cheap immigrant labor say "there are certain jobs Americans are not willing to do".

Americans who live in areas which do not have a lot of cheap immigrant labor do those jobs which Americans supposedly will not do.

Take away the Third Worlders and the white folks will collect trash, wash dishes, build houses, and all the other manual labor jobs.

"Take away the Third Worlders and the white folks will collect trash, wash dishes, build houses, and all the other manual labor jobs."

Those aren't tough, menial jobs. I don't hear of Michigan(7.6% unemployment rate) natives migrating to Arizona to pick lettuce (which pays above minimum wage).

Interesting. We should blame the illegal immigrant problem on Michiganders. If they would only relocate then there would be no need for immigrant labor, and the problem of illegal immigration would end.

While Republicans talk a good game when it comes to the illegal immigrant problem, the fact is that most businesses that employ illegals on a regular basis are Republican and support Republican candidates. The business class Republicans - the moneycons - want the illegal laborers here regardless of what they say in public to appease the base. Which makes them more hypocritial than the Democrats, but only slightly.

IMO...the problem is not the pay, nor the nature of the work. The problem is that farm work is usually temporary. Nobody wants to work for only a few weeks a year, then move on to the next crop if there's an alternative. Even the illegal immigrants prefer fast food jobs if they can get them. They may pay less, but you can settle down, send the kids to school, etc.

When my dad was a kid on a farm in the Imperial Valley in California, they solved the temporary nature of picking fruit by simply paying enough for the fruit tramps to take nine months vacation every year. He is still in touch with one girl (now a grandmother) from those days. Her family just goofed off after the harvest.
Pay people fifty dollars an hour to pick tomatos and they will. My dad made three dollars an hour in the packing shed when he was fourteen. When three dollars an hour was enough to pay a mortgage on a house.

Take away the Third Worlders and the white folks will collect trash, wash dishes, build houses, and all the other manual labor jobs.

I love how you lump carpenters with dish washers and garbage collectors. Typical cubicle monkey mentality, if you get dirty and sweaty during your job it must be inferior.

I'm lumping together inaccurately?

Here in Southern California I watch Hispanics do:

- trash collection
- dish washing
- brick laying
- roofing
- laying foundations
- many other manual labor jobs
- lawn mowing and gardening

Are you telling me I do not see this? I see it from my cubicle. I see it walking thru neighbors. I see it in restaurants when I get a glimpse into the back areas.

These people are doing work so that the owners of capital can pay less for labor.

This is another example of socializing costs and privatizing profits. We pay for higher crime, lousier schools, more social programs, more prisons, more police so that capitalists can make more money.

No you’re seeing it, but you miss the point of my post. The point is that when you treat the skilled trades like the unskilled ones, you wind up with only unskilled labor. The contempt of the “professional” class for the working person allowed this to happen as they stood by while workers rights and protections were whittled away.

I think it was my parent's generation (I was born in '52) who wanted their kids to be "Better" off then they were. We(my generation) was pushed to go to college, Get a Good Job/career, Not do manual labor.

It was the promotion of the idea of having your kids get that good job you saw on TV. It just went haywire and became an end to it's self.

I have done everything from Putting on hot-built up roofs(when it was in the 90's) and shoveled snow off roofs to put on shingles, put on aluminum siding while -3F outside, Worked in a casting plant pouring 4140 stainless. I remember saying to myself looking at those guys in 3 piece suits in cars WITH air conditioning, When I'm 50-60 I want a job INSIDE looking out at the weather.

I have been a Systems Programmer/ Data Base Arch for the last 25 years. Now I'm going back and want to have a small produce/organic farm...

My mother always used to taunt me by asking me if I wanted to be a ditch digger. When I was young I did not have the discipline stay in school so I took up a trade, and became very good at it gave me a good living. I just turned 54 and the aches and pains are too much to work the long hours I used to, but I still work at a speed that amazes many of the younger carpenters. I tried switching careers a few years ago after going to school (did extremely well and earned a couple of degrees), but the sawdust was in my blood and I went back to cabinetmaking/carpentry. At least the skills should serve me well post peak. They are serving me well on my farmette now.

That ditch digger business is universal for the Depression Baby generation - I'm just forty and my parents were always on me about that - "If you're not going to do your homework we can go out and practice ditch digging."

It's kind of ironic as to how many ditches I'm digging now. As soon as the ground warms up I've got to dig a trench to prepare for 100 more asparagus crowns I just ordered. The torture never stops.

Good one Bruce, I call it my "beast of Burden" mode, I seem to spend much of my time hauling things around, stack the fire wood, haul the firewood in the house, cut the firewood, split the firewood.

This year add in shovel the snow, and then do it again, rinse & repeat. Spring brings garden prep, as you say. Always expanding and mostly with hand tools. There is always a pile of dirt somewhere that needs to be moved one wheel barrow at a time. It can get very Zen, constant motion, working the whole body, breathing clean fresh air, braking a good sweat. Course now that I'm nigh onto that 60 mark I do my Zen just a bit slower.

I'm the kind of guy, who when I was building the house and had the septic system put in, to save money I backfilled it by hand. Serious Zen.

I've dug exactly one ditch in my life, about twenty five years ago, and the asparagus we planted is still producing. That was the one official "ditch digger training" event I can recall ... must have been fifteen or sixteen and getting on my parent's nerves :-)

Bruce,

My high school graduate construction superintendent father who supervised large road construction projects and spent long days, weeks, months, years of his life with grader operators, pan operators, yuke operators, etc always wanted me to "learn to work with your mind so you won't have to work with your hands". He could do multiple skilled trades. He didn't want me to do end up doing one even though he taught me engine rebuilding and assorted other skills. (and now I write software and lead others doing software)

But we don't only have unskilled manual laborers. If we did then the skilled manual labor jobs wouldn't get done. Yet these jobs do get done.

Workers rights whittling: I think low trade barriers and low immigration barriers were the cause of that. I think we ought to stop the low skilled worker influx and then wages of manual laborers would rise.

The problem is skilled manual labor jobs are getting done, but with not much skill as the emphasis today is on making a buck as fast as you can and as cheaply as you can. Without the scaling back of labor laws such as “closed shop” rules, right to work laws, lax enforcement of maximum and minimum hour laws, overtime rules, the ability of employers to hire illegal immigrants would have been not nearly as great. This is an area I studied in law school. It is not just the enforcement of immigration laws but labor laws, and the repeal of worker protection laws, especially those that favored unions, that made it possible for the wholesale hiring of illegal labor. Why do you think Republicans stressed the repeal of worker protection, so they could hire Americans at a low wage? By getting rid of the regulatory regime they had an open field to get cheap labor. Just blaming immigration and trade (very significant) per say is not recognizing all of the factors of the situation.

This whole concept of "illegal immigration" will largely go away no matter who is the next President. The reason the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill is not being implemented before the election is that it is too contentious of an issue. Most of the current illegal immigrants will pay a $2000 or so fine to stay and get a Z visa. They will be then be "legal" (with a path to a green card), pay taxes, and be covered by minimum wage laws and the universal health care plans. A border fence won't matter at that point, because "legal" immigrants will be able to take a bus or plane across the border after getting their visas.

Yes, bruce, they lump skilled trades with dishwashing and that's why they have the shoddy throwaway homes they have.

I sweat in the fields every chance I got from twelve until eighteen and then I did another year as a research assistant in a corn mycopathology project after I got to college. Those jobs "Americans are not willing to do" were hotly pursued by my generation, because earnings >> allowance. I don't understand what changed in this country but I'd be perfectly pleased to see it go the other direction. We've got a young man who just turned eleven and next spring would not be too soon for him to be spending half days picking rock on the hilltops with other kids.

I think what changed in this country is that too many people today feel physical labor is beneath them and undignified

Here in Australia the "tradies" often make more than doctors. $100k a year would not be unusual once you get to master builder status or have your own plumbing or electrical business.

Not suprisingly, surveys have shown that many girls dream about marrying a carpenter or a bricklayer - the image is that they are tanned, fit and healthy from outdoor work, run their own business, make good money and are likely to own a big house at a young age.

I suppose our attitude down under is that it is not undignified if you are making good money.

That's true here, too. My dad has a PhD and is a research scientist. His brothers are plumbers, general contractors, auto mechanics, etc. They always had a lot more money than we had.

That argument lacks the next part "for the poor wages we pay."

BINGO!

its all about the money. you show up demanding $15 an hour for a job, someone else shows up and offers $6 for the job and will do it faster and cheaper than you. You have just been undercut, and you can't possibly carry on a positive lifestyle when when your wages just dropped 50%. But this other guy started with nothing and $6 sounds pretty good to him, so he is offered the job. The employer just saved 50% on labor costs. Guess who the employer is going to pander too next time he needs a job done? Besides the employer knows the craftsmanship in the trade is not up to par with the way it used to be but who cares? he just saved a bunch of money and is looking at profits only.

so no its not that we americans wont do the job, we just wont do the job because the pay is too low.

besides laying brick is a good skill to have, same with roofing and other building trades.

What if China floods the markets with geologist who will work for 15k to 25K a year. Heck, they don't even need medical insurance, don't you think the oil companies would start pandering to them? For sake of argument would it be fair to say americans will not do that job too, when the oil companies won't hire an american?

SAs 'seemingly unlimited wealth' is not 'trickeling down' to a vast number of Saudis. The per capitia income link below shows the Saudis are ranked 34th among nations and have a per capita income similar to Poland, Croatia, South Africa, Argentina, and others...But, far below such countries as the Czech Republic, Barbados, British Virgin Islands, Estonia, French Polynesia, and many others.

http://siakhenn.tripod.com/capita.html

Hello t,

re: "More rights for women, I presume, would help this situation."

Looks to be the case.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0856/is_4_27/ai_72739225

re: "Work."

Interesting discussion.

We might want to make some distinctions between paid and unpaid work, especially "women's work", eg., childcare, food preparation, cleaning, sewing, etc.

Let me guess.
The same reason we export many of our jobs?
It isn't just about cost.