It seems that the Meridian report has serious inaccuracies, and is too gloomy by half.

It aint' easy for an average guy like me to sort out what is happening, without engineering training.

I like to put ideas out there though, with the intention of having them shot down if there are holes in them.

Here is a very thorough discussion of the issue of lithium availability:

http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2008/02/mitsubishi-unvi.html#m...

It's a shame that some of the posts are personal, including a couple of mine, but some seem to find it a personal affront to suggest anything contrary to their own ideas.

I am hoping that one of the more technically qualified people there will write this up, so that we have an easy reference point.

I would still be more comfortable if we had rather more emphasis on zinc, with it's vastly larger resource base.

If lithium is in good supply, lead resources are of less interest anyway, so it seems concerns are misplaced.

It was an interesting excercise though!

That is a good discussion over at fraserdomain.

I took a closer look at the MIR report, and found that indeed, the data didn't support the conclusions. Definitely biased.

I sometimes post info about which I'm unsure, to get feedback. It's very helpful to say that's what you're doing, or to signal your level of certainty with phrases like "it seems that", or "this source suggests that". You'll alarm people less.