I've heard this, "I'm a uniter, not a divider!" line once before from a politician. I'm not saying this time it isn't different (it is different), but to argue against that point, exit polls in California suggested anyway that the people who were sick of Iraq tended to vote to Obama, those concerned about the economy tended to vote more for Clinton:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/06/the-issues-primary/

Hard to say since that war in Iraq is rather costly.

I have heard "I'm a uniter, not a divider!" and also "you are either with us or you are against us". Which is it and in which case? Can you believe anything this person says at any time?