101 comments on The Disconnect Between Oil Reserves and Production
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
101 comments on The Disconnect Between Oil Reserves and Production
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
- An interview with Stoneleigh - the case for deflation
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It is only through labor and painful effort, by grim energy and resolute courage, that we move on to better things.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
The main problem I see is 1980 does not go far enough back. I'd like to see production from the ME before it was nationalized.
We actually have the data in general production declined from the 1970's but its not a lot lower than when the same companies that are producing at the higher rates in North America etc where in control. In short nothing much changed except reserve estimates.
The 1950-1980 production data is in my opinion important for the thesis of this paper since it includes nationalization of resources.
BP gives production back to 1965, but reserve history only to 1980. EIA International Petroleum Monthly shows production back to 1970 - no reserves.
Simmons sheds a lot of light on this pre-bogus/post-bogus ME reserve change from when Aramco was run by the American oil companies in the 70s to the Saudi nationalized version of the '80s. There was a U.S. Congressional hearing in 1979 as a follow up to their 1974 hearings into overproduction damage to the Saudi fields in dealing with the demand surge of that time. They found that the problems of '74 had gotten worse. They didn't want to publicize these unsettling developments, so they muffled it from "hearings" to " A Staff Report to the Senate Subcommittee". As Simmons noted:
"The staff report did not hide, however, the huge reduction in the outlook for Saudi Arabia's maximum sustainable oil production. Gone were the confident expectations of the early 1970s that Aramco's oil output could rise to 20 or 25 million barrels a day. Gone too was a revised downward estimate that a plateau of 16 million barrels a day could be sustained for years. By late 1978, the realists at Aramco were predicting that even a rate of 12 million barrels a day begun in 1985 would lead to declining production by 2000 to 2005." Twilight in the Desert, p 383 App. C
This was in 1979 that these American Aramco personel were making this bold projection. It was based on 110 billion barrels of realistically producible reserves. And the report stated it wasn't likely that large new reserves would be found, which has been the case per Simmons. I somehow get the feeling they were a little more honest and/or knowledgable than their subsequent Saudi counterparts. The production curve has followed the 1979 projection closely despite the reserves being doubled, tripled, and what not.
Think of it. Hubbert's model had just been proven correct in predicting the U.S. peak when this government investigation spanning '74 and '79 came to the same conclusion as Hubbert on an approaching global oil production peak. So what does our government, whom we hire to look out for our well being, do with this information? Well, they hid it of course. They put it under lock and key lest we might get prepared. Honest to God, that's what they did!
"The notion that Saudi Arabian oil reserves could be produced at 10, 12, or 15 million barrels a day for 50 or more years was utterly dismissed by the subpoenaed papers that formed the basis of this staff report. What a misfortune it was that this report received no media coverage and these key papers were locked away from public view for next 25 years - years during which the entire world grew more and more convinced that Middle East oilfields were so prolific they could be produced at virtually any rate through the first quarter of the twenty-first century."
The supporting documents for this report were deemed "sensitive" and put under seal for another 50 years. Yet another brilliant energy policy coup by our wise men in Washington.
Thanks for posting this! Now that you mention this, I remember reading about this in Twilight in the Desert.
Saudi Arabia has produced about 81 Gb between 1979 and now. If it has 110 Gb in reserves than, just a subtraction would bring 29 Gb of remaining reserves. There have probably been some discoveries, plus some reserve growth, given the conservative reserves of the 1970s. Ace's reserve range of 60 to 100 Gb from his post a few days ago would seem a lot more reasonable than the published reserve of 264.3 Gb.