![]() | USA Grain Exports - Where to, how much? | The Oil Drum | CLJ08 closed above $104 today...in the next 60 days, the front month price of CL will... | ![]() |
The contents below are paid advertisements. Their appearance does not imply an endorsement by The Oil Drum.
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”
—Mark Twain
Search The Oil Drum with Google
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
- Enjoying Life Close to Home: Fun Streets
TOD:Europe
- Russia: There Is Life After Peak Oil
- Should EROEI be the most important criterion our society uses to decide how it meets its energy needs?
- Oilwatch Monthly - August 2008
TOD:Canada
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
- Weekend Energy Listening: Wind Power with Paul Gipe
TOD:ANZ
Peak Oil Primers
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- Ecological Economics
- David Strahan
- Econbrowser
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- Environmental Economics
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Organizations
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.






GAIA Host Collective
Kdolliso,
Not to be too blunt, but you could not be more mistaken.
Spend some time studying up on the Brazilian Cerrudo(sp) that President Lula is speaking of. It is not hard to see that exploiting this land will only have a short term benefit and will result in long term adverse consequences. Not to mention that as the Amazon rain forest shrinks and becomes more arid that the Cerrudo will become even more arid as its rainfall comes primarily from evaporation in the Amazon.
As one who grew up in "grazing land" I can assure you that if this land was suitable for any other agricultural use it would already be being used for that. We are currently having millions of acres of land being downgraded from grain production to grazing due to it no longer being fertile enough for grains. In many areas grazing land is no longer suitable for that use either. There are large acreages in the West and Australia that fit this description.
The reason there is a government program (CRP) to pay farmers not to use land is that (in general of course as scaming goes on everywhere) the land under this program was unsuitable for most kinds of cropping and the environmental consequences of continuing was not acceptable. Such land is really more suitable for grazing.
One can go on for hundreds of pages, which are all out there to find and read, about how our current forms of agriculture are way beyond sustainability already. Not to mention that the world is pretty much hell-bent on making the situation worse as fast as we can. Don't want to miss any opportunity for a short term financial gain. After all, we don't owe our children and grandchildren anything. When was the last time they did anything for us.
Wyoming,
Anecdotes, of course, abound. However, let Me give one.
I drive through Arkansas, from time to time, and observe tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of acres of good, fertile, formerly-rice land sitting there and drawing CRP Dollars. It is, quite simply, a natural resource that is being wasted.
Add into the mix Pioneers statement, yesterday, that they expect to increase corn, and soy bean yields by 40% in the next decade, and we are Awash in wasted Potential.
Sounds like the Green Revolution. Which is now collapsing in a heap of high fertilizer costs, drought, and overshoot.
kdolliso,
Yes they do, however I have studied this and you clearly have not. Sure there are CRP acres not in use that could be put inito good production. Thus my comment about scaming the system. It proves nothing. You are talking about many millions of acres that you seem to think are just being wasted because we are not growing something on them. This kind of opinion was underestandable in the 1800's when there was a virtually complete ignorance of how the natural systems functioned. It is not excusable in todays world. No one who has spent any time studying the various scientific disciplines that cover how life exists and sustains itself on this planet would even think of arguing that it is a good idea to fully utilize all arable land in the world. It would be suicidal. Taking Pioneers statement at face value is not a good plan. Look into the effects of over using land. There will be serious consequences for doing what the current plan proposes. It is hard for us today to understand how utterly humans have transformed the world if we have not lived long enough to see it or studied well enough to understand what has happened to it.
Human agriculture is long past the point where current practices can be considered susstainable in any way. We are degrading the land at a significant rate and thus having millions of acres fall out of production every year. This land is damaged and much of it will take millenia to recover, if ever. If humans just took the amount of virgin land into cultivation that replaced the same amount of production land we are having to abandon each year it is straightforward to see that even that is not sustainable.
It all boils down to a choice between short term gratification or taking into account future generations.
A great problem runs through these types of issues in our culture. The argument between development and conservation has been morphed into one between liberal/conservative or democratic/republican. Politics always twists complicated issues to some percieved advantage. Once it is successfull in a new labeling those who are proponents of either ideology seldom if ever actually check into the facts again. If they ever had in the first place. These issues are independent of politics just like morals and ethics are not owned by individual religions. I grew up a republican in one of the most conservative places in the US, but I have always believed that we did not make this world and we do not own it. We have a moral obligation to take care of it just like we have an obligation to protect children who cannot take care of themselves. Those who would destroy it through either ignorance or greed must be opposed because it is our joint obligation. Our children and grandchildren on into time will pay the price for our failures far beyond any accounting we might personally recieve.
Well said....
The World turns, with or without U.S.
BZ