![]() | France and Italy: is nuclear power the way for energy independence? | The Oil Drum | Public transport: making the right mobility choices | ![]() |
63 comments on From Botswana to New England - a different story
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
63 comments on From Botswana to New England - a different story
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“If kindness and comfort are, as I suspect, the results of an energy surplus, then, as the supply contracts, we could be expected to start fighting once again like cats in a sack.”
—George Monbiot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
No offence, but what percentage of the problems experienced in New England can be put down to the fact that US society is, well ... retarded?
No, seriously - other Western nations don't get this stuff, do they.
Let's face it - the US is not 'normal' in any respect for a Western society. The US is an outlier. It's amazing that anyone even understands (indeed, laps up) Hollywood, given how bizarre US society actually is, by normal civilized Western standards.
Truly, defending the U.S. is not something I generally do, but Italy and its handling of natural gas shortages come to mind - having a prime minister go on the national networks he owns (or are government owned) to remind those who cook to put lids on their boiling pots is pretty absurd.
The U.S. as we currently know it is unlikely to survive a decade, in part because American society seems to have replaced reality with Hollywood.
I have no real idea of what follows the current society that exists in the U.S., except that it will likely be much more in touch with reality. However, my opinion is that change in attitude will out of necessity, and not voluntary. And there is a fair chance that it will look very unpleasant to people from other cultures. A sort of fanatic purification which returns the U.S. to its 'real' roots comes to mind, for example, cutting Americans off from the wider world we share.
Now, if only someone can figure out how to pry thousands of nuclear warheads out of the U.S. before it fractures. Trust me, there are other scenarios which I can imagine that would be nightmarish on a scale that makes the doomer discussions here look like a pleasant fall afternoon in the park.
Franz,
Your account is almost 2 years old, but that post suggests, to me at least, you haven't been reading here much.
AS a US citizen, I agree with your assessment - as many here do.
Hang around a bit and you might get some excellent dialog about how non-normal the US is from some well-informed wordsmiths ;).
Living in Germany...
I read a lot out of your statement.
Downthread (well, Expat too), almost all have read something into your statement which has not been said. So...
In which concrete respects is the US "backwards"?
You mention
"US society is retarded"
"social arrangements and economic policies are already pretty weird"
"retarded political and social structure"
and that is as specific as you ever get (except for mentioning Holywood. Should I mention Winitou??)
Now.. What in the world are you talking about? Which system/superstructure/arrangements are you referring to? Get as concrete as possible, please.
The legal system?
The corporate system?
The tax system?
The energy infrastucture?
The social/welfare (lack of) structures?
Your blanket statement has gotten a blanket response...
Cheers, Dom
Franz,
Gratuitous anti-American comments are the worst part of The Oil Drum.
Dave
Au contraire, Dave: it's-all-about-population-close-the-borders-and-head-for-the-hills-YEEEEEHHAAAAAH! is the worst part of TOD.
Now, you may object to my use of the word 'retarded' ... so just concentrate on the other one, 'outlier'.
The US IS an outlier in many, many respects. It isn't normal at all. And here I use 'normal' in its neutral statistical sense.
Even for an Anglo-Saxon country, the US is just way off the edge. And Anglo-Saxon social arrangements and economic policies are already pretty weird, and would probably be completely unsuccessful but for the hangover provided by the British Empire and the 'hanger-on' effect afforded by the current US imperium.
But it's late here and I'm not arguing now ... the point is that developments in the US reflect the US's unique (and, yes, retarded) political and social structure and should not be taken to be representative of probable developments in the rest of the industrialized world.
[edited for typo: 'probably' changed to 'probable']
There is a fixation on natural gas usage for ethanol on TOD which does not make much sense and may reflect on the U.S. in general. Electricity production uses more natural gas than ethanol. When EROEI is applied (erroneously IMO due to unlike and unlike) it is lower than ethanol. Not only that, ethanol's usage of natural gas largely just replaces the usage of natural gas for MTBE before its phase out.
Electricity is almost a sacred cow even though most of it is produced from fossil fuels. It is hard for me to see the energy gain in switching to electric powered cars with the current infrastructure. True there may be an environmental gain as pollution may be easier to control at central plants, but there is a big loss of energy in electricity production unless it comes from solar or wind. And there is not enough of that currently.
I have to agree with Franz, it is difficult for Americans to apply logic. Being an atheist I think it is because the U.S. prides itself on being a religious nation. Logic and religion do not mix.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Albert Einstein
Your ethanol drivel is as logical as Pat Robertson's sermons are religious.
Recommended reading:
"I Don't Believe in Atheists", Chris Hedges, Free Press, 2008
and for people interested in an informed analysis of the best use of land and insolation in the (non-food) bio-energy domain:
http://www.reap-canada.com/library/Bioenergy/BIOCAP_REAP_bioenergy_polic...
The linked study deals specifically with the comparative effectiveness of various energy production incentives for greenhouse gas mitigation, but is nonetheless very useful in understanding why ethanol production is a tragic waste of resources.
"Logic and religion do not mix."
I disagree with that statement personally, but unfortunately, for the majority of Americans, it is all too true.
http://www.oilcrash.com/articles/tomorrow.htm
About 1/3 of Americans believe that Jesus will come and save them within their lifetime, so there is no reason to conserve energy/invest in renewables/worry about peak oil/think at all.
Luckily, Britain isn't quite as 'retarded' (to quote the above poster), but our politicians are almost as short-sighted.
What evidence can you provide that support your linking these two assertions?
If you just replaced all cars with plug-in hybrids and used eletricity (derived from the gas the cars wold be burning) to power short trips, you'd reduce fuel consuption by nearly half. (Engineer-poet already made those calculations.) That is because big generators are more efficient than car motors.
And, there seems to be no viable route to renewably powered cars except by eletrifying them, since most renewable (and nuclear) are good for generating eletricity, and hydrogen (the second best candidate) has a very big set of problems. Ok, maybe hydrogen-eletricity hybrids are more viable, but those still count as eletrical cars.
Any country that uses 1/4 of the world's oil is no outlier. It has to be paid attention to, regardless.
Well, that's wrong. Any country that uses 1/4 of the world's oil, considering that there are near 200 countries, has to be an outlier.
That is tautological. Now, the 'retarded' part has some oppinion/knowledge/predjudice (all having the same meaning here) on it.
Most of the higher US energy usage is a result of higher per capita income. Part of it is due to lower population density. Part of it is due to a large exporting agricultural sector.
That's like calling an elephant in the room an outlier.
Statistically, the elephant is the outlier.
"Any country that uses 1/4 of the world's oil is no outlier."
Unlikely that, but for sure any country with 5% of the worlds population that uses 25% of the world's oil definitely joins the in a group called Fat ____ Pigs.
Franz, I think these abnormalities in the US populace arise from two major factors.
(1) Unlimited availability of domestic oil and gas beginning around 1900 and lasting until about 1965. Using more was better because, as fuel roared through the production system, it left in its wake a built up infrastructure which effectively increased communal wealth. In this connection, bear in mind that US oil companies at that time had the ability to supply much more fuel than the populace could possibly use. In broad effect, we had unlimited free high-energy fuel. This period of time was entirely unprecedented in human history.
(2) Commercial broadcast radio and television on a very large scale encouraged constantly-increasing consumption of everything.
There is nothing wrong with the gene pool here; rather we have lived with such abundance, and saturated with such heavy pro-consumption propaganda, that we have lost touch with the reality that scarcity is possible and, in fact, is ultimately inevitable.
I think Americans are pretty retarded. 85% of the discussions on TOD are about how to keep the cars running and McMansions heated/cooled to a comfy 70 deg all year round.
The solutions are not real difficult -- basically trains and well-insulated apartments for urban areas, which is where most people would be barring an economic collapse, and efficient transport (motorcycles, electric bikes, etc.etc) combined with regional trains for rural areas, and far, far fewer suburban areas. My town here in rural upstate New York, population 1,000, has a train station from the 1800s that is no longer in service. (The station is now a train museum.)
If you did that, you would have something that looked like ... Europe. Heck, even in the Soviet Union, a huge, rambling land mass, people got by without personal automobiles.
Instead, we get a 24/7 technology wank-off. "Solar panels in parking lots! Ground-source heat pumps! Cars that run on compressed air!" Which are all OK, within the context of trains and proper urban/rural areas. As means to maintain suburbia, they will fail as suburbia is basically a failed experiment.
If you look at the history of civilization, from the Sumerians (3500 BC) to the present, you will notice that it is one of rural, food growing areas and dense urban areas, whether a small medieval village of 500 people or Paris of 1835. Suburbia was an experiment now about 60 years old, and it has been a failure. Nothing wrong with that, but let's move on. Like Communism in China, within the scope of their 5000 year history.
If you look at the recent history of civilization you will notice an industrial revoution, huge scientific discoveries, the development of communications and computing technologies, and now genetic engineering. The past is not always a reliable guide to the future.
I expect suburbs to shrink some. But most humans do not like living stacked up in many storied buildings. They will develop technological innovations that allow them to live in lower population densities.
"But most humans do not like living stacked up in many storied buildings. They will develop technological innovations that allow them to live in lower population densities."
equals:
"With a big enough technological wank-off, we can keep living in suburbia."
It is odd how Americans equate their odd preferences as those of "humans," although there is no evidence of such. The first apartment building in Japan was built in the 1920s. Today, there is a move OUT of suburbia into denser urban areas, because people don't like cars and long commutes, and prefer the pleasures of city living.
At some point, Americans may realize that their supposed preferences, which they equate with those of "humanity" although they have nary a clue what people in other countries think or live like, are the OUTLIER.
It should be no surprise that, when Americans persist in this behavior, they seem pretty retarded to people in the rest of the world.
The national character of Japan is very different from the United States. People steeped in (and likely even selected for genetically over generations) a culture which prizes harmony is going to get along much better in dense conditions than the boistrous, multi-ethnic, multi-cultural stew on the east of the Pacific.
econguy, Yes we have such different preferences. We like expensive German luxury cars. But the Germans don't. We like fast food restaurants. But our fast food companies can't expand abroad. We like Hollywood movies. But noone in the rest of the world watches them. We like to spend as much as we make. But the Brits are big savers. We like expensive clothes. But the Japanese are content to go around in modest outfits.
Oh wait, these people in other countries do want all that stuff. Consumer culture pops up wherever incomes rise.
Long commutes in Japan: Yes, if you make the commutes slow enough and long enough and expensive enough then people decide that given all these sticks they'll suddenly decide that an apartment looks like a carrot. But give them space and empty roads and cheap gas and the money to buy a house and few will live in apartments.
European lifestyles differ from American lifestyles out of necessity. Higher population densities, higher energy costs, and lower per capita GDPs cause more urban living. You can make a virtue out of necessity. But this is just after-the-fact let-me-feel-morally-superior spinning.
Gratuitous means "without cause". I think the anti-American comments are generally not without cause.
And in any case, any critiques I'd have of the US - being wasteful with energy, polluting, warmongering, arrogant, spineless in addressing real problems - apply just as much to my own country, Australia.
Yeah In Australia we are so smart that Kevin07 has gathered together a kilo of people to come up with some ideas next month to fix everything by 2020. Don't panic, we've signed Kyoto, apologised to the natives, abolished slavery (WorkChoices)and today we solved the drought and fixed the health system. It's a good thing this summit. For a while there I thought the guvmint was going to run out of things to do. I hope they decide how to keep us from becoming Merikans!
I would also mention New Zealand. The Wellington central business district was out of power for several months in '04-05. I recently saw a story, albeit written by a Green, suggesting that a repeat was not too far away.
As for Europe, Greece, Turkey and Bulgaria lost their Central Asian gas this winter. Who's next?
The usual round number I see for the population of "The West" is a billion people. The anglo-saxon countries total over 400 million of that. Forty percent, with the rest split a dozen ways, does not add up to an outlier.
Edited to add that a quick google for "italy power failure" is also instructive.
Franz;
At the level you're asking your question, you'll never get a realistic answer, but you'll at least get to do some fine finger-pointing.
Hollywood isn't America, first off. It's stuff that Americans buy, and as you remarked, clearly a lot of other folks buy it as well. It pretends to paint a fantasy picture of 'America', but there are a lot of people who aren't actually duped by this charade, and many of their consumptive actions are more a result of the system they've grown up within. You can't choose to get around town with a trolleycar if the Highway Lobby and the AutoCo's had them all ripped out half a century ago, after all.
Misunderstanding our country biased towards our prominent Squeaky-Wheels, Loudmouths and Yahoos is no surprise, of course, but your conclusion that 'Other western nations don't get this stuff..' is what drew my attention. England's energy status doesn't look an awful lot more secure than ours, does it, due no doubt to many of the same unsubtle demands of a persistently 'Short-term view' market-ideology and a glorious addiction to the black stuff. The 'Continent', meanwhile is at the end of a series of umbilicals going towards Russia, KSA and Africa, to name a few.
It seems to me that as particularly uncouth and gluttonous as the USA can be (and that's the part that always sells best on camera), that we are ALL 'soaking in it', and have to change a lot of our habitual ways of dealing with energy, and of stereotyping one another, if we want to find a way out of the maze.
Bob
Franz, you hit the nail on the head re the USA. Everyone should read "Dark Ages America" by Morris Berman. I just picked up a copy on a recommendation. Things are going to be tough everywhere when the oil and gas run out but Americans are going to be particularly nasty with our toxic level of extreme individualism, materialism, stupidity and religion. Read Berman's book if you aren't convinced. Get out now if you can.
No, we are in pretty good shape. Parts of the country are far enough south to get a lot of solar irradiation. Other parts have lots of wind. We also have coal and oil shale and hydro.
Now, our total energy consumption could fall by a quarter or even a half. But we'd then fall down to a level far higher than the level at which least three quarters of the world's population lives.
Fecundity and IQ are fairly strongly negatively correlated. What do you expect?
Mean IQ is arbitrarily set at 100. Since the lower a person's IQ the more childern they have, on average, the mean intelligence of the population inevitably declines. But since the mean is set at 100, an IQ of, say, 110 today is equivalent to ~90 a few generations ago. As population pressure mounts, environmental crises potentiate one another, and cheap fossil fuels are running out, we need all the intelligence we can muster. Unfortunately, intelligence, like petroleum, is becoming depleted.
Franz,
In what way is the U.S. more retarded than anyone else? After talking to various people and from personal experience I get the impression that people are the same all over the World. The illusion that some countries operate more logically seems to be due to the fact that they have to, not that they want to (if you don't have the wealth you tend to spend money more frugally).
For example, take Canada. Before the 1988 Free-Trade deal it used to be said (and I agreed) that "the English(-Canadians) lived to work while the French(-Canadians) worked to live." By 2003 any young Quebecois (French-Canadian) I randomly met and spoke with surely brought up the topic of money... and how to make more of it. My big reason for occasionally vacationing in Canada no longer exists... so now I vacation only here in the U.S..
Maybe it was something you said? I found the same thing happened to me after visiting Mexico for the second time. Or maybe it is some sort of virus?
My friends who travel here and there say it's happening all around the World... at least that's their subjective opinions. Seems to agree with my experience. Maybe there are far more twins that were seperated at birth than we know about?
I think you'll find a DOUBLE peak.
The middle classes have 2.4 children or fewer ... but those on welfare .. AND THE WELL-OFF / RICH i.e the brightest part of the population ... have large families.
Wives of richer families need not have jobs, and these families can afford people carriers, large houses etc.
Here's a video to clarify that point:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upyewL0oaWA
It isn't so much a matter of depletion as proliferation. Are humans smarter than yeast?
That was one of the most depressing videos I have seen posted on TOD.
Souperdoomer
Go Franz!
Let's list some developed ("Western") countries:
Canada
Australia
New Zealand
Japan
Germany
Italy
France
Spain
UK
Ireland
Hong Kong (part of China)
Singapore
Korea
Austria
Switzerland
Belguim
Norway
Sweden
Denmark
Finland
Most of these have been handling their energy issues reasonably well for decades, via taxes on fuel and automobiles, focus on public transportation, maybe encouragement of nuclear power (France and Japan), and many other means. None of them have an SUV/freeway/McMansion problem, except perhaps Canada and Australia. None of them have the gaagaa debate in which the SUV/McMansion lifestyle is "non-negotiable." Most of them don't have talks about "electrifying" and "double tracking" rail (noble as they may be), as this was done about fifty years ago, and is as common as indoor plumbing.
The US is indeed the outlier.
Franz,
There is no normal except in a statistical sense of an average of all peoples.
Germany has opted for a massive solar build in spite of its geographic location so far north (very cost ineffective). Germany has opted for shutting down its nuclear power plants in spite of its location so far north.
Britain is looking at an electric power gap starting around 2018 and is going to build a bunch of offshore wind that is twice as expensive as onshore wind and way more expensive than nuclear.
Italy is a mess in lots of ways. The corruption for example.
I could go on and name more dumb policies by more governments. But my point is I see plenty of foolishness and stupidity everywhere I look. The difference with the US is it is wealthier, more powerful, more visible. So people like to take pot shots at it.
"Britain is looking at an electric power gap starting around 2018"
yeah, any predictions on who is going to win the world series too?
Franz,
I'm confused by your point really. What have you got against Americans? They virtually invented the electricity industry and all the groovy gadgets that work because of it, while the stupid Europeans whose scientists like Georg Ohm, Allessandro Volta and Andre Marie Ampere discovered electricity, were too culturally stuck to adopt a new way of thinking about energy and how to harness this wonderful natural phenomenon.
Without the efforts of American entrepeneurs like Edison, who did't just invent new technologies but worked hard to exploit their commercial use, we would not be here on TOD bagging the shit out of eachother. Give credit where it is due. I don't know where you are from or the circumstances of your life but the fact that you have access to American invented technology leads to me believe that you have probably personally benefited a great deal from the fossil fuel fiesta and the Americans who basically invented all the apparatus to exploit it.
Americans are a little different to the rest of the world. Hollywood simply exagerates a basic truth that I have learned about American culture. The entrepeneurial spirit of rugged individualism, basic freedoms to fail or succeed by your own wits, and an almost arrogant disregard for what anyone else thinks of you are the drivers behind Americas technological superiority that outshines the rest of the world by far.
I think sometimes that there is a great deal of smug satisfaction here to watch America fall both economically, politically and militarily. American power has not been all sweetness and light to be sure, and some of the excesses of American culture are quite vulgar and destructive. America will have to go through a cleansing of sorts to clear out this excess and energy decline is likely to be the trigger that causes this. But I would urge you to think seriously about the consequences of a seriously destabilised America before you hurl insults, despite your contradictory claims of not wishing to cause offence.