![]() | Thoughts after a trip to Botswana | The Oil Drum | France and Italy: is nuclear power the way for energy independence? | ![]() |
108 comments on A Better Gas Tax?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
108 comments on A Better Gas Tax?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What people need to hear loud and clear is that we're running out of energy in America.”
—George W. Bush, May 2001
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I have an idea for a gas tax that makes a lot of sense to me, see if there is a problem that I have not thought of (I am probably not the first to think of it either). Instead of having a straight gas tax that has a strong adverse effect on poor consumers and no political support, collect a large tax on every gallon of gas sold, but then divide up the proceeds evenly and pay all residents back an equal share. So you could institute a $3.00 a gallon/tax but at the end of the year all adult U.S. residents would get a check for X dollars, where x is $.00 times the average per capita fuel use (minus administrative costs).
Using this method the person that uses the average amount of gas would break even, someone using large amounts of gas would pay more, and someone who used little or no gas would get paid a dividend. This would create a strong market incentive to conserve fuel without unduly hurting the poor. OVer time the average fuel use would presumably decline.
There would of course be a number of logistical problems, such as accounting for the transportation industry and regional differences, and how to pay out the dividends, but these could be easily overcome. You amy also want to skim off some of the proceeds for alternative energy research etc.
Thin edge of the wedge my friend. As soon as the politiicans startskimming off a bit here and a bit there, before you know it there is nothing left to be redistributed.
The American taxpayer needs to pay more tax anyway to to reduce the federal and (presumably) state deficits. You also need to reduce oil consumption in toto if you want to combat the huge trade deficits that seem to be finally catching up with your dollar. Two birds, one stone.
The American taxpayer needs to pay more tax anyway to to reduce the federal and (presumably) state deficits.
Or to cover the debt.
I'm waiting for tax protesters to join the constituionilsts, home schoolers, and excessive internet posters as enemies of the state.