![]() | The Bullroarer - Wednesday 9 April 2008 | TOD: Australia/New Zealand | The Bullroarer - Friday 11th April 2008 | ![]() |
38 comments on National Liquid Fuels Vulnerability Assessment
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
38 comments on National Liquid Fuels Vulnerability Assessment
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
User login
Contact
- anz at theoildrum dot com
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
I guess that answers the question about Rudd and renewables. Since there are nearly 9000 hours in a year that 2020 target approaches 5 Gw continuous average, maybe 10% of all current installed capacity. I surmise that since CSP, geothermal and solar towers can't be sure of their contribution to the 20% target (circa 10 Gw) that investment remains more of a gamble than windpower.
While we're still smitten with Rudd remember so far it's all talk and that the renewables surge is yet to happen. At least Howard had a cycle commuting minister in Tony Abbott. I note on telly tonight that Premier Lennon reneged on his promise to get a hybrid and is now cruising the boulevards in a shiny new Statesman. I have this horrible feeling we are going to be disappointed in the new 'green' ALP.
I agree most investment seems likely to go into wind initially if the news MRET target is put in place.
Geothermal will have to wait until GeoDynamics proves it is possible - which could be a while.
Hopefully they wake up to the potential of large scale CSP (obviously there are 4 or so plants already underway, but only one reasonably large one).
I'm not smitten by Rudd - just cautiously hopeful. The Tassie ALP is hopeless.