69 comments on Oil Rises, Gasoline Climbs to a Record, on U.S. Supply Decline
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
69 comments on Oil Rises, Gasoline Climbs to a Record, on U.S. Supply Decline
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Of all races in an advanced stage of civilization, the American is the least accessible to long views… Always and everywhere in a hurry to get rich, he does not give a thought to remote consequences; he sees only present advantages… He does not remember, he does not feel, he lives in a materialist dream.”
—Moiseide Ostrogorski (1902, 302-303)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
95% of all financial media is total BS-why should energy reporting be any different?
But Sir, these data are from our democratic government!! Surely you aren't implying that Gee Dubyah would actually LIE to the 'merikan sheeple! Wouldn't that be grounds for impeachment?
{sarcasm off}
E. Swanson
BrianT, see my question - do you have any proposals.
What is this oil-stock-guesswork once a week good for?
Why not every day (more detail) or every month (less noize) ??
(Suggestions appreciated)
I have far more confidence in the reporting of the data from the EIA than most other sources. As they stressed, over and over again during the two-day Conference in DC, their data gathering procedures (and the statistical approach they take) is pretty straight forward.
It's their projections that leave something to be desired.
Great data, not so great projections in a number of areas. They (the EIA, and Guy Caruso in particular) offered some reasons as to why this has been so and what they are doing to address a projection approach that is and has been dominated by demand side factors as opposed to the supply side.
Yesterday afternoon, there was some fairly technical and astute observations of the macroeconomics trends, why some "signals"s seen in the past aren't having the same the effect (or perhaps it was more accurate to say a greater delay)that they did in the past.
Those of us whom stayed to the "bitter-end" heard some interesting observations on vicious cycle (sounds like positive feedback) that we are now in.