The complete list of megaprojects at the wikipedia [oil megaprojects] is for over 13 million barrels per day added.
Plus there is all of the small 200-25000 barrel per day small wells. Like several hundred in the Bakken to offset the 4.5% decline. Ten of thousands of small rigs.

So it looks like 8-16 million barrels per day to be added net of the decline.

Dream on. . . you lost me at Bakken.

I'm still waiting for an answer regarding the following question:

If private oil companies, using the best available technology, with virtually no restrictions, could not reverse the long term Texas and North Sea declines, why would they be able to reverse the conventional declines anywhere in the world?

Note that Saudi Arabia and the world, in 2005, were at the about the same stages of depletion at which Texas and the North Sea respectively peaked in 1972 and 1999 (based on HL).

If the Ghawar complex is in decline, it would appear that every single oil field in the world that has ever produced one mbpd or more of crude oil is in decline.

I'm not arguing that we can't make money finding smaller fields, but I doubt that we can reverse the long term decline, especially given the super giant situation.

In calculating this 8-16 mbd did you account for the fact that many of those megaprojects will not reach the stated peak flows during 2008/2009?

Thanks for calling my attention to the megaprojects list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_Megaprojects

If the depletion rate holds at Yergin's 4.5 percent, and if all these projects are on time and reach their production goals you have a net addition of about 5,000,000 bbl/day by end of 2009 through the megaprojects. Do you think small wells will account for 3-11 million barrels per day? Seems like a pretty huge stretch to me.

Taking a closer look at the megaprojects list, though, causes one to feel a little more cautious about making overly optimistic predictions:

1. Saudi Arabia, alone, is slated to add 2.7 million bbl/day in the 2008-2009 period. With Saudi stating it will not increase production and that the market is well supplied, one has to wonder if any of this 'new oil' will see the market as a production gain. Saudi Arabia's secrecy in the oil reserves area also does not inspire confidence.

2. Iraq is slated to add 900,000 bbl/day in the period. Given the current trouble in the country and geopolitical instability resulting in production being shut in, it is possible that Iraq may not deliver.

3. Nigeria is slated to add 610,000 bbl/day. As the country has a history of instability and shut in capacity, I don't know if any added capacity is likely to reach market in a consistent fashion.

4. In all 7.5 million bbl/day of new capacity is supposed to be produced inside of OPEC. As the cartel is acting more effectively as a cartel it may be possible that these barrels won't reach markets for reasons of political self interest.

5. Canadian additions in the megaprojects summary during 2008-2009 are supposed to reach 735,000 bbl/day. Canada is just now beginning to feel the bite of plummeting natural gas supplies. Since Canada relies on synthetic oil/tar sands for new supply gains and such production is slated to involve 10+ percent of the nation's current natural gas supply future reductions in that supply may well have a negative impact on Canada's ability to increase production.

6. Russian additions in the megaprojects summary during the 2008-2009 period are supposed to reach 1.1 million bbl/day. Taking a closer look, Russian production 2007-2008 is flat or declining so one wonders if the 1.1 million bbl/day addition is a realistic figure. Furthermore, it is possible Russia could curtail new projects in favor of higher priced oil. Its strong arm tactics regarding gas supply do not inspire confidence in its commitment to add supply to world markets and place downward pressure on prices. Most analysis supports a price increase bias on the part of the Russians.

Of course it's possible that many of these projects will also experience delays or fail to produce expected amounts of crude. Regardless, given the above list, at least 6.1 million bbl/day of the megaprojects list confront serious geopolitical and other production risk factors. Furthermore, if enhanced recovery is biting as deep into the reserves as some on this site are projecting, the depletion rate may well be beyond Yergin's optimistic 4.5 percent.

In any case, I don't think this new oil is a sure thing by any stretch and a net gain in oil production of 8-16 million bbl/day by end of 2009 seems to be in the realm of a hallucination. I think any gains, if there are real gains, will be fought for tooth and nail and that we will struggle to break 90 million bbl/day in any case. Both above and below ground factors make this a really tough sell.

Good luck with your predictions! I hope you don't have any money riding on it :)

Cheers

Rob

Um, guys? Have you seen the latest IEA OMR?

http://omrpublic.iea.org/

"Global oil supply fell by 100 kb/d in March to 87.3 mb/d, led by lower supplies last month from OPEC, the North Sea and non-OPEC Africa."

This has got to be monumental. The world is scrambling to produce every liquid an engine or generator can burn. Prices are as high or higher than they ever were. Demand is still pushing forward. And the IEA reports a supply backslide?

As for megaprojects -- show me the oil.

Canada has new natural gas discoveries in BC.

http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/04/some-natural-gas-and-oil-plays.html

The Horn River Basin, very little was known about the play until Feb 28, 2008, when Houston-based EOG Resources Inc. said it might have reserves of six trillion cubic feet - the same as Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, and a figure that would increase Canada’s total proved reserves by roughly 10 per cent.

EnCana Corp. of Calgary - which claims the initial discovery of Horn River’s potential - and partner Apache Corp. of Houston may also have 6 trillion cubic feet of gas, Apache said in early February.

Montney natural gas is potentially one of the largest economically viable resource plays in North America, says a report by Raymond James Ltd.

Estimates for gas content in the sandstones, siltstones and shale sequences of the Triassic-aged Montney formation in northeastern British Columbia put the resource size at about 50 trillion cubic feet (tcf) over an area of about 680 square miles (73 billion cubic feet per section). This estimate is near the bottom end of the range of the B.C. government estimates of 30 tcf for the Upper Montney and 50 tcf in the Lower Montney in B.C. alone. the report says.
==
I will adjust my predictions (not speculating quite as much on the smaller production).

2006, 2007 were flat oil production years so roughly 3.5-4 million b/d of megaprojects has gone to offsetting decline. So 3 to 3.5 million b/d is the projected excess from 2008, 2009. So it would be 6-7 million barrels per day to be added net of any decline for the end of 2009 and into 2010 as those new additions scale up. If the increase in large projects also indicates more small projects then say 0.5-1.5 million b/d each year from that increase.

So if we are at 87.3 million b/d Jan 2008.
Then my prediction is a little over 90 million b/d at the end of 2008 (not the full 3.5-5 million b/d increase because of lag in scaling)
For the end of 2009, over 94 million b/d and for the end of 2010, over 97 million b/d.

So if we are at 87.3 million b/d Jan 2008.
Then my prediction is a little over 90 million b/d at the end of 2008 (not the full 3.5-5 million b/d increase because of lag in scaling)
For the end of 2009, over 94 million b/d and for the end of 2010, over 97 million b/d.

So, to be clear, you are predicting that world total liquids will (on average) increase by between 300,000 and 400,000 b/d every month from now until the end of 2010?

"The Horn River Basin, very little was known about the play until Feb 28, 2008 .."

Hmm, you know I have been posting about oil stuff for quite awhile but I don't recall ever intentionally using the word "play" to describe a prospective reservoir. I always knew what it meant, but it seemed to insider talk for my tastes. So when I see it used, I immediately think about the possibility that AdvancedNano reads too many press briefings or worse, is some sort of shill.

A similar thing occurs when I read about an earthquake. If people read only newspapers, everyone would go around calling it a "temblor". Now I look it up and find it is just Spanish for "earthquake". So these journalists go around and use the word Temblor because they probably secretly want to impress somebody. Or they happen to be a Mexican seismographer.

Play (n): Oil industry jargon for a prospective reservoir. Used by investors to hype something.

I did cut and paste a some of the sentences from the press release on the natural gas discovery. So what. I gathered information (which happened to be company reports and press releases) on over a dozen of the biggest oil projects. It seems likely that if an oil project is going to start producing or is producing this year then the company working on it would have a pretty good sense of it was going to happen. If a company says that they are going to start up a project this month, I would tend to believe them since there is little uncertainty. If they are promising for the next year or later then a lot more can go wrong.

So I added information and research to this oildrum discussion. My website http://nexbigfuture.com you can see that I have almost 2100 articles (43 of which are about oil). You and other here whenever they see any information from a company or from someone who has a position that is positive on any industry or company have a knee jerk reaction ... shill. Which is an assertion without facts.

You parse one or two words in one of serveral 1000 word posts.

Why don't you try to find some information about why particular projects will not happen if you believe your case (as one of the other commenters Robert Marsdon did). Bring some information and research to your position.

Yes my prediction is an average of 225,000 b/d increase in 2008
avg 333,000 b/d increase in 2009
and avg 250,000 b/d increase in 2010.
Overall avg 277,000 b/d from now to the end of 2010.