 | Energy from Wind: A Discussion of the EROI Research | The Oil Drum: Net Energy | The Energy Return of Nuclear Power (EROI on the Web-Part 4) |  |
56 comments on Unconventional Oil: Tar Sands and Shale Oil - EROI on the Web, Part 3 of 6
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
56 comments on Unconventional Oil: Tar Sands and Shale Oil - EROI on the Web, Part 3 of 6
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
User login
Contact
- theoildrumeroi at gmail dot com
Personnel
Archives
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
After contemplating synthesized crude oil ("syncrude") from kerogenous dolomitic limestone ("oil shale") since 1968, I believe the shortest and most appropriate conclusion I have reached is: "Halitosis is better than no breath at all."
Except perhaps to the people and ecosystems around you that have had more naturally successful dental plans....
"Halitosis is better than no breath at all."
This is an example of the logical fallacy "False Dilemma"; no breath assumes death if the action isn't taken (which is false), and halitosis is a term that simply suggests harmless unpleasantness, downplaying the real harm from climate disruption, pollution, and resource depletion.
Perhaps a more appropriate, though much less succinct, metaphor may be;
"Using tar sands and oil shale as energy sources while ignoring climate disruption, air pollution, water pollution, resource depletion, and conservation measures is like pissing in the wind."
Or better yet:
"Clean teeth trump halitosis any day."