156 comments on DrumBeat: April 26, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
156 comments on DrumBeat: April 26, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.”
—Eleanor Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
SuperG discovered that those counters were sucking up an extraordinary amount of resources. There's ten stories on the front page, and every time someone accesses the front page, it has to search the database to produce the counts for each of those ten stories.
This will help the site run faster for everyone...including those on dial-up. If the number of comments is really that important, you can probably keep track of it yourself, either on paper or in your head. That's what I was doing yesterday, when SuperG turned off the "new comments" altogether on the front page for awhile.
I have noticed better initial load times and generally better overall performance.
Thanks SuperG!
Pete
Leanan, I don't know if it is practicable with the software on this sites, but a really nice feature on some is that you can press a 'Next New' button and go straight to that part of the thread.
Is this practical here?
Look for new] is the nearest I've managed...
... mine's the one with the 5 litre green petrol can.
Dave, you can do it here. Just click on "Edit" then "Find in This Page". Then in the "Find" box type in a bracket ([) then "new" exactly as it appears at the top of each new post.
You can do next new or previous new.
Thanks for the tip!
-But I am not finding the 'Edit' button other than on my comments - could you give me any more guidance? Thanks!
He probably means the browser's "edit" menu. Then, "find in page" or something like that in the menu should give you a box in which to enter the search text.
yeah, that works fine - I thought he meant in the Oil Drum menus! Cheers
ctrl + f = find...then search on [n....once you get to the new post, you will need to click your cursor in the text of the post and then click Next on the Find window.
I guess I'm the odd man out but I see not showing the number of new posts as negative. I understand slow dial up speeds - our landline was 2-4k until we went to a "high speed" wireless carrier with all of 20-40k.
Given the number of posts these days, I don't even take the time to look unless there a quite a few new posts. Granted, I could figure out how to use the edit stuff...but going through that takes time too...and I still wouldn't know how many posts were new.
Sorry, count me out.
Todd
I'm with Todd and Bruce from Chicago; even with broadband, I don't like scrolling through a lengthy series of posts for a handful of originals. And not all of us are techies capable of using the edit stuff without having to deal with an obnoxious learning curve.
Antoinetta III
Nothing 'techie' about it, Antoinetta - I just didn't think of using the browser to search.
In your browser, Internet Explorer or Firefox, go to the top left of the screen, and click on where it says 'Edit'
You will now get up a box in IE, or a bar at the bottom of the screen in Firefox, which will say 'Find in this page'
Type in [NEW] and bress the button.
You are there!
All you then need to do is press the 'Next' box to go to the next new.
Ye gods and little fishies. I didn't realize there were people searching for new posts by scrolling. Don't do that. Big waste of time. Use your browser's search function. Every browser has one. There's no learning curve at all, I promise. It's easy. And knowing how to do it will help you on your web travels everywhere, not just here. It works just like in your word-processing software. A monkey could do it.
Heck, that's why I prefer reading things on the web to reading things on paper. I miss the search function on paper.
I didn't realize there were people searching for new posts by scrolling.
On a bigger screen, the blue colorshift + scroll works for me.
Otherwise yes, using the browser search works fine.
Asking for all features to be done at the TOD server is like asking the feds to do things VS the citizens doing things.
I am for it. Perhaps I will now be able to access TOD on my BlackBerry. Before, it would always freeze up.
If you turn off javascript on your blackberry before accessing TOD, it should work.
Yes. I have Javascript turned off for TOD, too, or pages load very slowly and I get a ton of error messages. Basically, with Javascript blocked, all you lose is the ability to collapse subthreads. The site, IME, runs much better with Javascript blocked.
I will also add that searching for {new} flags works a lot better with Firefox than with IE. IE has that dopey popup window that blocks part of the screen. Firefox has a discreet box in the bottom of the window. You can leave it up all the time, and never blocks your view. Much more convenient.
I'd really rather not go to the "next new" button concept. I've found sites that use that are buggier than a picnic in July, and we have enough problems.
Scotty was right. The more complicated the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain.
I note that the number of "new" messages is back.
Thanks to whomever. I hope it stays.
Todd
It's not back for me. The number of new posts displays once you're in the thread in question, but not on the front page.
I did, however, forward your complaint to SuperG.
Has the old paper on the design of Slashdot with the squid proxies in front and the database on the back end been looked at (in case the budget allows for many boxes)?
That would give a throughput boost with just config of proxies and tossing money VS actually profiling code and trying to redo code trees.