Why did BP sell the Forties oil field?

Production falling.

Why did BP sell Grangemouth refinery?

No oil, no refinery needed.

Why did BP not ensure that they retain operational control over the Forties pipeline system?

Wealth losing proposition from here on out.

Why were banks so keen to lend such large amounts of money to buy assets that world beating companies no longer required?

A Sovereign wealth fund and/or hedge fund/Synthetic Investment
Vehicle to leverage out debt as far as possible into the future
while taking all/as much "real" wealth out ASAP.

Why is the Ineos pension fund under strain?

Because all wealth is being drained into the Queen's Offshore Tax Havens and other Top .01% positions. Pensions are being underfunded across the board.

G7 countries are looking to crush labor across the board.

This is only the start.

Clive Maund almost gets it (MI-6?):

http://www.safehaven.com/article-10087.htm

"As we entered this unique century, the greatest economic and military power in the world, the United States, still basking in the glory of facing down and defeating the Soviet Union, had the choice of getting together with the other nations of the world and arriving at a common and equitable agreement regarding how to apportion and parcel out the world's dwindling fossil fuel energy supplies in the coming decades. Instead of taking this enlightened route it has decided instead to adopt the primitive "me first" approach and has embarked on an old-fashioned campaign of colonial conquest, with a few sycophants in tow such as Britain hoping to get "a piece of the action". This is, of course, very bad news for the planet, not just because of the colonial powers' plans to make off with most of the pie, but because of the vast misuse of resources required to secure a disproportionate share of the pie in the first place, which has involved considerable death and destruction, including a lot of Iraqi civilians and US servicemen."

Complete control of the Mid-East, which the United States and the major oil companies are now close to having achieved, of course confers massive power over the rest of world, in particular over rising economic powers such as China and India and the immense leverage that this will in time afford can be used to steer these countries in whatever direction is desired. The US is believed to be involved in a strategic race against time to corner the bulk of the world's remaining oil reserves, the control of which can then be used to dissuade countries like China from resorting to the wholesale dumping of dollars or US Treasuries, along the lines of "Try it and we'll cut off your oil supply", which one would expect to be couched in more diplomatic language. Because of its gargantuan levels of debt the US is acutely vulnerable now, but with time it plans to tip the scales back in its favor partly by sales of its recently acquired plunder."

Britain, as the 1st officer of the US in its wars of acquisition, will enjoy a privileged place at the table in an increasingly resource starved world. Israel will look on with quiet satisfaction at all of this."

The worker in all of this will be crushed.

There is no polite way to get the attention of the Queen and her minions.

Note that the workers here aren't demanding anything more, they're striking to keep what they have. That's where we are.

TPTB have to start taking away to keep increasing their wealth.

Good luck to us all.

James

PS-"A two day strike over the protection of workers pensions does not seem unreasonable action to take."

Watch law enforcement/military. Whose side they come in on.

Like during Thatcher's Coal Strike, I don't think it'll
be on labor's side.

It's greed and stupidity that will kill us.

Dont forget: When BP Sold the Grangemouth Plant (Assets) it also sold on the Grangemouth Workers Pensions (Liabilities).

Sold in 2003, BP must know that carrying 1200 current workers and quite possibly a lot more current pensioners into 2013, 2023, 2033 when UKOil tapers to zero and would appear to have been a shrewd move on BP's part.

Its just that nobody gamed a strike and identified a single point failure in the Forties Pipeline.

Sometimes you can be too clever by 'alf...

The economic pie has expanded significantly over the course of the energy age. The average person has enjoyed an increase in his standard of living, but the privileged few at the top and in power have taken a disproportionately large shares of the expanding pie. This has been accomplished by destruction of free markets through imposition of laws to rig the economy in favor of the few; call it slavery, socialism, economic fascism, or corporatism as you prefer.

There is an underlying, yet still invisible point which might be called the revolution point or break point. It occurs when the economic pie begins to shrink (in this case from lack of energy supplies) and the average person begins to suffer intolerably. This suffering is inflamed by a continuation of the rigged economic system as those in power seek to continue their plunder of the shrinking pie.

I think that this incident is a reflection (reachback) of the approaching revolution point; the future is in a little way revealing itself to us. The average man has tolerated the current inequitable system because the pain of fighting against it (other than the ineffective within the system approach) would be greater than the pain of accepting it. Strikes are mostly a "within the system" protest. I imagine that over then next decade or two there will be an escalation and we will see more strikes, riots, local insurrections, repression, anti-government terrorism, sabotage, and eventually open civil war.

I doubt that out of the goodness of heart will those in power release their stranglehold on the masses, so I am fairly certain that we face a violent future; and, even in a free society economic suffering of great magnitude would be disruptive.

I also point out that once the rate of growth goes negative, as Albert Bartlett illuminated the mathematical basis to understand, we are looking at halving periods instead of doubling periods. If the rate of growth goes to -3.5% it will only take 20 years for the economic pie to be cut in half. Consider that in absolute terms, rather than percentage terms, the first halving period will be the greatest of all to come, just as the last doubling period on the way up was in absolute terms the greatest expansion period. As we linger on this plateau at the top of the energy age, the magnitude of what we face is almost too difficult for my mind to grasp.

"TPTB have to start taking away to keep increasing their wealth."

Take it one step further, They are STEALING the future.

Any real profit that might have come from real production over the next 20 to 30 years has been cashed in and pocketed.