![]() | Grangemouth/Forties Update: Forties pipeline remains shut down (Thread 2) | The Oil Drum | Forties - Grangemouth: the failure of a complex tightly coupled system | ![]() |
![]() | Grangemouth/Forties Update: Forties pipeline remains shut down (Thread 2) | The Oil Drum: Europe | Forties - Grangemouth: the failure of a complex tightly coupled system | ![]() |
20 comments on Grangemouth strike: Anglo Disease in action?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
20 comments on Grangemouth strike: Anglo Disease in action?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
- Aleklett's Energy Mix Global Energy Systems, Peak Oil, etc
- www.SamassaVeneessä.info Finnish peak oil site
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Its an OUTRAGE that workers expect the employer, or government for that matter, to provide a pension. People must save and invest in their own future.
The cost of the pension is embedded in wages, so the employee is paying for the pension anyway. Why not control those funds coming out of the check?
The company should replace the workers with someone willing to work and take personal responsibility for their own retirement instead of asking the company to do it for them.
I'm not sure whether this is a bit of trolling, so I'll just take it seriously and thus frame my reply.
Part of what all unions, and for that matter, all workers including management and CEOs, negotiate for nowadays is some sort of retirement benefit. The company benefits by giving an incentive for experienced well-trained personnel to stay on for as long as they can, so that the company is not constantly training new people for positions in the company, and undergoing the loss in efficiency and increase in labor cost due to mistakes made by inexperienced personnel. The worker benefits by not having to worry about the vagaries of the stock and bond markets with respect to his or her retirement money. This becomes more important as the average educational level of the employee decreases, and the physical demands of his or her position increase, and the likelihood of work-related injury (chronic and acute) increases. The company benefits also from the good will and loyalty thus engendered, and also the fact that the worker now has a stake in good outcomes for the company and could presumably be encouraged to work towards those good outcomes.
The other alternative is to have a business with high labor turnover and low employee satisfaction, such as in fast food, service industry (like restaurants) and retail, which tend to be paid at or near the minimum wage. If however the work is dangerous or requires expertise and experience, it's wise to have a contented workforce which will not walk out or quit suddenly. Oil drilling and refining is a good example of the latter.
When a company makes a formal written contract with an employee or the employee's agent, the usual master-servant employment-at-will doctrines do not apply, namely that one receives a day's pay for a day's work, and that one can be fired for a good reason, a bad reason, or for no reason at all. Instead, the law created by the contract now controls the relationship and the outcomes. If the employee contracts with an employer for an old-age insurance policy which will vest in a given finite amount of time and pay out a sum certain over a period of time and such other benefits as may be contracted for, as partial compensation in exchange for the labor of the employee, the company is obligated to provide such insurance and to pay on it, or be liable for its breach.