You, and in fairness, Choren's summary box, are neglecting 365*24*45 = 394200 megawatt hours of electricity.

And this is substantial.
While it generates only 113,400 barrels of oil worth $13million,
It produces 394.2GWh of electricity worth 19.71million at the $0.05/kwh price of coal electricity.

So overall, the most profit is out of the gas, not liquid.

Thanks for picking up on the electrical power output. I completely missed it on the chart. Something doesn't quite add up, though, as my ballpark numbers now suggest that an efficient wood-burning power plant could produce at best about 139 GWh hours/year with 65,000 metric tons of dry wood. That would put the power value at about $6.9 million.

Assumptions:
65,000 mt = 65,000 x 2,200 = 143,000,000 lb wood/year
8,300 BTU/lb higher heat value
40% power plant thermal efficiency.

Something I haven't seen yet is an analysis of the inputs and outputs.

68,000 metric tons/year @ 17.4 GJ/tonne = 1.18 EJ
18 million liters diesel @ 38.6 MJ/liter = 695 TJ
45 MW * 8760 hr/yr * 3.6e9 J/MWH = 1.42 EJ

Whoops!  The claim is that more ELECTRICITY comes out than biomass energy goes in!  There is clearly an error in the figures given.

Could the electric output possibly be 4.5 megawatts, not 45?

Good catch. I tought that the discrepancy is moisture in the wood. But even though having igh effect, it cannot account for it.

I would say that the 45MW would the Max Suppliable power that could be delivered in the peak hours, using perhaps stored gas and stored charcoal. Outside of peak hours it would perhaps deliver a fraction of it.

But that makes some economy calculations invalid.