It is a myth that EVs and PHEVs are so advantageous. We must burn mostly coal, natural gas and oil to get the electricity, then waste 40 to 65% of the energy in heat loss in steam turbines, then there is loss in transmission by power lines, then energy is lost in the battery. EVs don't do well in the winter/heat, and summer/AC. Then explain how you will have all of the 18 wheelers, tractors/combines, and trains running on electric. Imagine the infrastructure for all of this and you will make Rube Golberg look normal, and you will get the wizard award of the century for pulling the capital out of your ..... ear for all of this.
It is interesting that the National Academy of Science in 1977 said the main problem is liquid fuels, and so did Hirsch, the Congressional Research Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and General Accounting Office studies after reviewing all the energy crisis stuff. But you say, we don't need liquid fuels.
Interesting to see, how ideology trumps reason and science.
When the tank-to-wheel efficiency of light-duty ICEV's is under 15%, it's hard to see how EV's are less advantageous even when they run on coal. When they are running on solar, wind or nuclear power, they are far more advantageous than internal combustion.
Electrified rail is superior to diesel rail. Has been for decades. Electric locomotives have more pulling power and greater acceleration capability than diesels, because they don't have to carry their own power source. There is also the possibility of regenerative braking with energy dumping back to the grid; you can't do that with ICE only.
It is a myth that EVs and PHEVs are so advantageous. We must burn mostly coal, natural gas and oil to get the electricity, then waste 40 to 65% of the energy in heat loss in steam turbines, then there is loss in transmission by power lines, then energy is lost in the battery. EVs don't do well in the winter/heat, and summer/AC. Then explain how you will have all of the 18 wheelers, tractors/combines, and trains running on electric. Imagine the infrastructure for all of this and you will make Rube Golberg look normal, and you will get the wizard award of the century for pulling the capital out of your ..... ear for all of this.
It is interesting that the National Academy of Science in 1977 said the main problem is liquid fuels, and so did Hirsch, the Congressional Research Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and General Accounting Office studies after reviewing all the energy crisis stuff. But you say, we don't need liquid fuels.
Interesting to see, how ideology trumps reason and science.
When the tank-to-wheel efficiency of light-duty ICEV's is under 15%, it's hard to see how EV's are less advantageous even when they run on coal. When they are running on solar, wind or nuclear power, they are far more advantageous than internal combustion.
Electrified rail is superior to diesel rail. Has been for decades. Electric locomotives have more pulling power and greater acceleration capability than diesels, because they don't have to carry their own power source. There is also the possibility of regenerative braking with energy dumping back to the grid; you can't do that with ICE only.