Back in this universe, there is no way that a 30 year old physicist is going to get something usable from the Cold Fusion effect. Firstly, because the youngest guy in the field that I know of is 48 - all the potential young people have got scared off by the severe career damage that results - and secondly because all the research that can be done on a shoestring has already been done. Cold fusion is a quantum nanotechnology / surface physics phenomenon, and only a really well-funded lab or corporation could do meaningful work in this area. Thirdly, the CF / LENR community represents a much smaller fraction of the science community (i.e. no more than about 40 active research groups worldwide) than does Peak Oil in its corner.

TOD-ers, you have no idea what it is to struggle against a really dominant cultural paradigm, believe me.

My point was murdering a child in the name of peak oil might be counter productive. We may need that individual. By all means use protection and birth control, but to try to place some noble afterthought on abortion that they were trying to help the environment is crap.

The same ethics could be used to unplug all the people on life support, then kill all that can't or won't work. Or maybe we just let the next SARS sweep the aerth and kind of thin the herd you know?

I did get your point, and it is a fair and valid one, but I couldn't let an opportunity to plug Cold Fusion (my favourite subject) go by.
Sorry for being such a philistine.