![]() | One big sigh... (Sarkozy on lowering gas taxes) | The Oil Drum | Richard Heinberg: Coal in the United States | ![]() |
48 comments on Refining 201: The Assay Essay
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
48 comments on Refining 201: The Assay Essay
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“If kindness and comfort are, as I suspect, the results of an energy surplus, then, as the supply contracts, we could be expected to start fighting once again like cats in a sack.”
—George Monbiot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
The one aspect missing from the above presentation is the hydrogen content of the crude, products, and major fractions. Products contain only carbon and hydrogen, with the hydrogen content ranging between 14 and 15 wt%. The hydrogen content of crudes varies approximately linearly from 14% at 40 API to about 10wt% at 10 deg API (oil sands).
Vacuum residue (5 API for heavy crude) has about 8-9% hydrogen. Coke has 3-4% hydrogen. Thus, the raw products from coking of a vacuum residue (38 wt% coke yield from heavy crude with 24% "Conradson Carbon" are very "hydrogen deficient" with respect to refinery products (11% vs 14%).
If you assume the net yield from heavy crude is the same as light crude, you need to add a lot of hydrogen which is an input from the energy in natural gas. About 2 wt % H2 net, based on products will be required for a 22 wt% heavy crude converted into products. Less than 0.5 wt% will be required for light crudes, which can be obtained from the reforming process, which, incidently causes a reduction in volume vs the heavy naphtha feed.
Bottom line is that processing heavy crudes is no piece of cake-- more NG is required to achieve the same volumetric yield, which implies more hydrogen capacity, more hydrotreating capacity, more sulfur recovery capacity, and more utilities capacity.
Correction--that would be 22 API heavy crude, not 22wt% heavy crude.