![]() | One big sigh... (Sarkozy on lowering gas taxes) | The Oil Drum | Richard Heinberg: Coal in the United States | ![]() |
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Home Buyers Demand Short Commutes, Efficient Homes (with Backyards, Parking, lots of Square Feet)
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
TOD:Europe
- IEA WEO 2008 - Fossil Fuel Ultimates and CO2 Emissions Scenarios
- The IEA WEO 2008: Will coal usage be phased out?
- Oilwatch Monthly - November 2008
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”
—Richard Feynman
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
The one aspect missing from the above presentation is the hydrogen content of the crude, products, and major fractions. Products contain only carbon and hydrogen, with the hydrogen content ranging between 14 and 15 wt%. The hydrogen content of crudes varies approximately linearly from 14% at 40 API to about 10wt% at 10 deg API (oil sands).
Vacuum residue (5 API for heavy crude) has about 8-9% hydrogen. Coke has 3-4% hydrogen. Thus, the raw products from coking of a vacuum residue (38 wt% coke yield from heavy crude with 24% "Conradson Carbon" are very "hydrogen deficient" with respect to refinery products (11% vs 14%).
If you assume the net yield from heavy crude is the same as light crude, you need to add a lot of hydrogen which is an input from the energy in natural gas. About 2 wt % H2 net, based on products will be required for a 22 wt% heavy crude converted into products. Less than 0.5 wt% will be required for light crudes, which can be obtained from the reforming process, which, incidently causes a reduction in volume vs the heavy naphtha feed.
Bottom line is that processing heavy crudes is no piece of cake-- more NG is required to achieve the same volumetric yield, which implies more hydrogen capacity, more hydrotreating capacity, more sulfur recovery capacity, and more utilities capacity.
Correction--that would be 22 API heavy crude, not 22wt% heavy crude.