190 comments on Richard Heinberg: Coal in the United States
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
190 comments on Richard Heinberg: Coal in the United States
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
- The US stimulus and "green jobs" for wind energy
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 13th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”
—Mark Twain
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Sorry, I'm not much of a writer. Yes, that's what I meant. The stampede will happen, but coal is not an answer for peak oil mitigation, for one thing because the problem isn't peak oil but rather peak resources and population overshoot.
You have to remember that different fuels fit into different segments of the energy use pie. The immediate problem that we usually discuss here is the coming gap between supply and demand at a reasonable price, of oil and natural gas. They are liquid fuels and most of their use is in transportation.
In contrast most coal is used to generate electricity and, as I point out as part of a comment below, the public is not amenable to significant increase in that price. Which is a problem since it is largely in displacing coal that solar and wind have the potential. None of the three has a realistic chance of providing significant volumes (by which I mean over a million barrels a day) of liquid fuel in the next 20 years.
In a way coal is, however, like oil, in the latter case you only produce as much as the refineries can handle, in the same way with coal, there is not much point in producing more coal than the power stations can handle, since you can't sell it.
If only that were true. Unfortunately, without electricity storage or a shift away from a power on demand system, solar and wind will not displace the baseload parts of the existing generation system (e.g. coal and nuclear), they will displace the part that supplies the variable demand that results from weather and time of day demand variations (e.g. gas and hydro). That is why solar and wind are currently limited to about 20% of the generation mix and why building new nuclear is so important.