350 comments on DrumBeat: May 29, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
350 comments on DrumBeat: May 29, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What people need to hear loud and clear is that we're running out of energy in America.”
—George W. Bush, May 2001
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Some trenches fill with eroded continental land mass from an adjacent mountain chain and create a subduction melange of sediments.
But if the subduction zone is active, these deposits do go under: so not really.
To get oil you need BASINS. these can form in a variety of ways, typically, the north sea is a failed rift valley that sunk and was subject to rapid burial. This failed rift was probably a first attempt at an Atlantic. (though maybe theories have changed a bit in the last 30 years...)
Oil in Brazil and its opposite numbers in West Africa, formed when the Atlatic Ocean was much younger and South America and Africa were a close fit, separated by a depositional basin.
As this early basin provided all the right ingredients: Organic matter - source rocks, Clastic reservoirs, Clay and mud and salt seals, and rapid burial to cook the kerogens.
Then , the Atlantic continued its split, giving continental crust and oil deposits on both sides of the Atlantic.
BTW: This is why the Canadians look on the Atlantic coast as do the Brits and Irish on the Atlantic Margin.
Just to add on to what MUDLOGGER said, some sediment does subduct in a trench, in fact this is called an accretionary wedge. Don't think of it as chunks though, the aspect ratio on sedimentary rock is more like a piece of paper than a "block". i.e. wide and flat. So typically in continental crust collisions sediments, like sheaves of paper, just crumple and form the Himalyas or get skimmed off like California and glued to the side of a continent (think what it would look like if Japan got stuck onto the side of Asia). But when you have oceanic plate subducting under continental plate, some of the sediment can get pulled under the continental plate alongside the denser oceanic plate.

I wouldn't think of an accretionary wedge as a good place to form oil, too much stuff getting smashed up and moving around. Although, just a cursory glance at google showed me this which seems to indicate that there is at least the possibility of oil deposits in them.
"just crumple and form the Himalyas or get skimmed off like California"
i think i understand what you are saying here, but it is my understanding and belief that the himalayas were created when two continents collided. i dont believe there is any similar collision anywhere on earth.
and i think your california example and hypothetical japan/asia collision represent islands, carried along on an ocean plate, colliding with a continent.
.....and, how can i view that tiny cia print on the document you cite ?
Deffeyes addressed the question of finding oil in the ocean bed beyond the shelves in his '01 book. He describes the necessary conditions for formation of oil, then states:
It would have to be some new-fangled kind of oil to have formed there I guess.
I read a blooomberg article 28 April
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aalWn.eJHGZk&refer=l...
"...Pumping oil from the Brazilian finds, parts of which are 32,000 feet (10,000 meters) below the ocean's surface..."
Obviously 32,000 feet is much deeper than "but no deeper than 15000 feet"
So how does that work then?
7500-15000 feet below the dirt surface, whether air or water lies above that.
32K feet of water may change the pressure/temperature map slightly for that deposit, but it is depth below the solid surface that most counts.
Thanks. I realised it would be the depth below the solid surface that mostly counted but thought it was around 7,000 feet deep but carelessly didn't mention that:-( so the water must be deeper then i thought.