To me a young wife doesn't fully explain his predicament. According to Wikipedia he was worth 200 million in the 1990s which sounds about right for a guy who has been in show business since the 1950's He was on a show with Carson for 5 years, on the Tonight Show for 30 years, did a show with Dick Clark for 16 years, hosted Star Search for 12 years, was on a TV show with Tom Arnold for a year, was a spokesperson for Publishers Clearing House, did lots of Budweiser commercials and probably had other endorsements. Wikipedia also says he had several expensive divorce settlements, but California law only gives the spouse half of what was earned during the marriage, not even half of all assets. He hurt himself and hasn't been able to work for a a year and a half, but to go from 200 million net worth to being 644,000 dollars behind in your mortgage payments is astonishing to me. If you have a real vice, like gambling or expensive art of other collectibles, isn't their some way to put some money into a trust that pays you income but doesn't allow you to get at it?

If you have a real vice, like gambling or expensive art of other collectibles, isn't their some way to put some money into a trust that pays you income but doesn't allow you to get at it?

You don't even need a vice, real or otherwise. You just set up a trust, as I have, and once your mortgage is paid, deed your property to the trust and have it pay all related taxes/expenses. If one is wise and affluent enough, have the trust pay all your bills, insurance premiums, etc., and provide you with a stipend that allows for comfortable living without depleting the trust.

No offence to you as I am sure you are a great guy but F#@%ing A!

That people think that they can simply exist and live the American lifestyle, riding on stored wealth is a crock of O-NPK (no offence totonelia).

The one and only reason there is excess wealth to be stored and for you and many others to suck the teat of is because the US has raped and pillaged the rest of the World securing way more than our fair share of what the world has to offer , even in the face of mass death and suffering .

There is not extra.

Just as ethanol and bio-fuel in general is not sustainable because there is no waste in biomass.

Something must do without and die.

But hey, Nighty night, sleep tight

The one and only reason there is excess wealth to be stored and for you and many others to suck the teat of is because the US has raped and pillaged the rest of the World securing way more than our fair share of what the world has to offer , even in the face of mass death and suffering .

You don't think I know that as a historian of the US Empire? Have you not read my goals for the wholesale rollback of the US Empire to try and attempt to mitigate the disaster we've wrought?

What I described above is a vehicle put in place by my familial anscestors that is based upon several generations of hard won work and savings that I have the privilige of managing, along with caring for my remaining elders who built the vehicle.

I've never seen you accuse the many here who are obviously using this forum for advancing their own self interest.

For your information, I'm trying in an admittedly slow and halting fashion to establish a Lifeboat/Post-Carbon relocalized community not far to the west of Corvallis, and trying to make my community of Yachats and that of greater Lincoln county Peak Oil aware, and using funds from my Family Trust to do so. My elders are very much aware of the situation--both Peak Oil and Climate Change--and are quite alarmed, and want to do what they can through the utilization of their resources to build for the future in the best spirit of our communistic community and county. I donate the fruits of my labor on a weekly basis to retirees and Food Share. I try to teach others on other internet forums about Peak Oil, which as we all know is a thankless task in most cases.

Yes, I'm lucky. I have a modicum of security. I worked hard for it as did my ancestors. I did it through long hours managing resaturants and institutional food services, and then teaching at the community college level. My ancestors were also teachers and farmers, paternally immigrants from Spain in 1911; maternally, from Ohio and the reservations of Arizona Territory.

Yes, I'm a contradiction: a radical with affluent means. If that pisses you off, then that's your problem.

Before now, I'd hoped to meet you and talk shop; it seemed natural as we're geograpically close and actually share many ideals/goals. But now you're coming across as someone wanting to attack my farm out of envy as opposed to helping it grow and feed others not as fortunate as myself and my ancestors.

You are showing through your behavior how it's possible for good people to go bad in a Mad Max scenario. You show why Envy is one of the Seven Deadly Sins.

Not envy in the least and if you have not noticed I am very consistent on this issue. I have ranted about others using TOD as a source of inside info to cash in on.

People on this site talk about how impossible it is to get any one to move on the big issues facing the world and I watch those same people talk about how they need to protect their "store of wealth".

HELLO!!!!!!!!!!!

We will do nothing that adversely effects our wealth. The US will do nothing about GW, because it might adversely effect our wealth. The only "solutions" we will entertain re GW, PO, etc. will be ones that enhance our wealth.

Well this IS the problem is it not?

The accumulation of, and the storing of wealth is what caused the problems facing us and I do believe you understand this yet even you can only think in terms of protecting/enhancing your wealth.

My anger is not aimed at you specifically nor at wealthy in general (what is wealthy?) but at this incredibly destructive and self-destructive system we are caught up in.

I apologies for singling you out but please keep your wealth in your pocket and stop waving it around in a forum that discusses the death of millions which is decided primarily by the size of their pocketbook.

yet even you can only think in terms of protecting/enhancing your wealth.

Excuse me, but I said I'm working to utilize my family's store of accumulated wealth to enhance the lives of others, while maintaining economic security for my family. I didn't create the economic system we must operate within. I'm trying to use it to enable myself and others to break away from it as we must when it finally collapses. Altruism is the term.

And sociologically, in all primate societies, the welfare of the immediate group comes first. This forms our primary cultural behavior pattern. Some have tried to expand this fundamental caring beyond the immediate familial group to include ever larger groupings--the ultimate goal of socialism. Basicly, there are people willing to share and those who aren't. Religion tries to accomodate and mitigate this fundamental antagonism, which in most cases ends in failure.

Until the system changes into one where accumulating wealth isn't required to accomplish public goods, then it will remain the source of both good and bad deeds.

Natural selection in action. Those who have resources will try to use them to assure their survival and the survival of their families. Resources can be "wealth" or actual physical resources. The response is the same.

Don't like it? Bitch at Gaia and Darwin, not here.

GZ - you miss the point.

You bitch about the fact that nothing is being done or the wrong things are being done and I'm simply pointing out why.

I would also argue that your "triage" is occuring right now and the selections on who lives and who dies is decided by $.

Such is the way it is and always has been so if you are ok with that then sit back and watch.

I'm not ok with it not because I'm poor, I will fare better than most, I just think it stinks and if people understood this better, and they just might at some point, they are going to think it stinks too.

The one and only reason there is excess wealth to be stored and for you and many others to suck the teat of is because the US has raped and pillaged the rest of the World securing way more than our fair share of what the world has to offer , even in the face of mass death and suffering .

Can you give some examples of what you are talking about regarding "raped and pillaged". I can see where the destruction of this continent has been severe, including the mass murders of a people who were living a sustainable lifestyle and the destruction of massive amounts of forests. But what are you talking about regarding the rest of the World? Would you make the same comment of a wealthy person in Switzerland?

If you need examples of the U.S. imposing hegemony and usurping the resources of poor countries, then you just haven't been paying attention! ;) I think his point is that there are sundry externalities that support the decadent lifestyle of Americans. And Energy Descent is going to tear down and then turn a harsh light onto the intricate dying connections that support the throw-away cheap oil lifestyle.

What have we usurped outside the US? (Usurp 1 a: to seize and hold (as office, place, or powers) in possession by force or without right b: to take or make use of without right )

If you say Iraq, that hasn't been a source of wealth at this point. What have we usurped - siezed without right - from other countries that made us wealthy?

The "raping and pillaging" was/is institutionalized through IMF, World Bank and WTO policies, as this item about Africa makes clear. And prior to that we had "traditional" Imperialism/Colonialism.

A thesis was put forward by Eric Williams in Capitalism & Slavery that African Chattel Slavery provided the capital required for the West to industrialize; thus, the Swiss being the Bankers of Europe, certainly benefited. Indeed, it's been put forth that all whites, even the poorest and those imprisoned and transported, benefited from slavery. That such theses are controversial in the White world is unsurprising.

I can't believe I didn't think of US slavery. That was pretty pathetic on my part.

But as far as you article goes, I am totally fed up with some guy in a suit talking like they know the story and not saying a thing about population. Africa doesn't have enough food for its people and loans from the IMF are talked about and not a word about their rapid population growth for decades, if not a century? Alarming, astonishing, startling, and in the end I have only one thing to say to the guy in the article - sit down and put a sock in it. How many back flips will these old pundits do before they ever find the balls to talk about population growth?

THis response is real late in the day, so to speak, and unlikely to be read. Anyway, I've read Walden Bello's items for the last 2 decades and on many occasions he's talked about the issue of population. In fact, he was one of the few "pundits" to incorporate the Limits to Growth implications into his analysis. There is also a very substantial record of the cited Western institutions neocolonial/neoimperialist policy goals and depradations.

I suggest you read When Corporations Rule The World and a few other holistic information sources to increase your knowledge of how the System and its managers work.

He needs to talk about it all the time. Particularly when he is talking about Africa not having enough food now when it used to. They also have a lot more people than they used to.

If you want to place the poverty of Africa on Western corporations and countries, you are leaving one group out. African leaders. There are no invasions taking place in Africa from the west. Anything that takes place in Africa takes place with the approval of their leaders.

Anything that takes place in Africa takes place with the approval of their leaders.

How democratic have those, mostly educated at Western institutions, Compradore Leaders been? How many enslaved "their" populaces to loans they skimmed 20-30% or more from and moved to Swiss accounts before being thrown out via a coup or revolution? I totally disagree with your assertion that "There are no invasions taking place in Africa from the west," as invasions don't need to be made by armies to be devastating.

I think this is why the ancient world viewed usury (charging interest) as such a terrible sin. It's "money for nothing" - wealth gained without actually working or producing anything. Useful as credit/investment is, the steady-state economies of the time simply could not afford to carry very many people who did not work.

Particularly when they were already carrying knights and so on, who cost a fortune - the cost of a suit of armour was about equivalent to the price of a tank in relative purchasing terms.
It was also a convenient excuse for defaulting on debt, as they could simply massacre their creditors - did someone say: Congressional Committee' and 'speculators'?
The more common people were also rather upset by being thrown off their land when they had had to take on debt due to a poor harvest, and the elite did little to shield them - 'repossession' anyone?

Joan Rivers nailed it.

'Now tell me,. What attracted you to a small , bald, 80 year old BILLIONAIRE?'.