 | The Month of the Psychological Shock (Over Oil) in America? | The Oil Drum: Europe | Fierce pride - yes it works! (or, first ever bank-financed offshore wind farm inaugurated!) |  |
117 comments on Truth, Lies, Oil and Scotland
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
117 comments on Truth, Lies, Oil and Scotland
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
My jaw dropped in disbelief as I heard this discussed on Radio 4 this morning.
A quick back-of the envelope calculation reveals that the extra 30 billion barrels they're talking about is equivalent to around one year's global oil consumption.
It's too much to ask reporters these days to do simple arithmetic.
Or even to consider multiple factors at the same time.
There was NO mention at all in that "news" report this morning of climate change and the need to drastically reduce fossil fuel consumption.
The BBC is making a habit of this, decoupling oil from climate change at every opportunity.
Phantom oil is very low in carbon emissions, I believe.
The real stuff is different.