 | DrumBeat: June 24, 2008 | The Oil Drum | Nigeria – The Significance of the Bonga Offshore Oil Platform Attack |  |
| Saudis announce oil production increases...again...and again...and again... | The Oil Drum: Europe | A State of Emergency | |
149 comments on Why UK Natural Gas Prices Will Move North of 100p/Therm This Winter
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
149 comments on Why UK Natural Gas Prices Will Move North of 100p/Therm This Winter
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
There is currently a 2GW connector to France, I believe.
I have no information on their contractual obligations, as even France may not be keen to export electricity on a cold winter's day - has anyone better information?
On a brighter note, these prices for gas should make nuclear costs unchallengibly competitive, in spite of rising construction costs.
Of course, the British government has done everything possible to make it difficult to get started on a nuclear revival, as they have turned down a bid for the nuclear sites from EDF, who could undoubtedly have done the job, and now propose to have different consortium;s building at different locations, with all the waste and delay inherent in that approach.
The record time for a build is around 4 years, in the far East - it looks like our establishment intend to add a nought to that.
Chris Vernon's post downthread gives information on 'The French Connection', which shows that it is indeed 2GW, and further shows its availability during a cold winters day - for much of the time is it not available, although it does kick in again at the top peak.
In practise it may be easier to get France to build some more capacity for export near to the channel whilst we await action from our Third-World class government to order and build capacity, not to mention their ability to run them properly.
Four modern Areva twin reactor set-ups would provide around 12GW of power to the grid, and they could be built in perhaps 6 or 7 years - that would, incidentally, be more than the average hourly power projected to come from the off-shore wind build, at a fraction of the cost and a lot faster.