73 minutes of Amsterdam Bicycles

A photo essay based on 73 minutes of observation near a main city square. A look at what Non-Oil Transportation can look like. The comments are good too.

Sloow load with dial -up.

http://www.ski-epic.com/amsterdam_bicycles/

Best Hopes for the Quickest Non-Oil Transportation Conversion,

Alan

Alan writes:

73 minutes of Amsterdam Bicycles

A photo essay based on 73 minutes of observation near a main city square. A look at what Non-Oil Transportation can look like. The comments are good too.

This has always struck me as indicative of American and European attitudes toward cycling. In America you are considered an ID10T if you don't wear a helmet or use special riding clothes or other equipment. In cities like Bruges and Amsterdam no one wears helmets or special clothes. They wear daily clothes. Cycling is utilitarian, not just recreational.

While cycling to an art gallery outside of Harrlem, Netherlands I saw a scene I won't forget. Two middle aged women on dutch cycles with their full dresses flowing in the breeze were leaning over their handlebars chatting with not a care while cycling to the art gallery. They were as comfortable cycling in daily clothes as walking to a close restaurant.

In my several trips to Europe I saw only two of many thousands of cyclists wearing helmets. I saw no one wearing spandex riding shorts. It's true their average speeds are much slower than American roadies and that in itself may be the real reason America is so off base with respect to utilitarian cycling. We think it's just for sport. Cyclists in Bruges and Amsterdam think of it as life.

"It's true their average speeds are much slower than American roadies and that in itself may be the real reason."

Ammond, I think you got a good start on answering your own question/argument. Amsterdam is wall-to-wall people and then some, a relatively small city with New York density (and the 84 square miles in the Wiki page must be including some of the less dense satellite areas like Bijlmer, because the more touristy bit, which is less than 30 square miles, is really jam packed.) It's crammed in every way, so speed is not really possible, and there's only a little way to go before you're in the next city. And when you're not going anywhere to speak of, speed is not essential.

When they're out in the country - or, more precisely, what they would refer to as the "country" - I never saw anything that looked like real "country" as it's hard to find a spot out of clear sight of the next town - they may sometimes even ride road bikes and even wear your horror of horrors, spandex shorts. (By the way, I've never quite understood the horror of some over those, in the light, or whatever it is, of the routine acceptance of the often glossy spandex, or at least spandex-like, knickers that are part and parcel of the standard American football uniform.)

In addition, theft is so utterly out of hand that you can't use an even slightly decent bike for utilitarian purposes unless, for example, you commute and can take the bike inside where you work. I knew a couple of people who could indeed take it inside, and they indeed rode road bikes to work unless they needed to run errands (they also participated in races, so sport and utilitarian use are actually compatible, contrary to what you seem to imply.) So it's a choice forced by social mores, in this case that people profess to hate petty crime but fundamentally condone it as some sort of Robin Hood thing. That means we can't know what they would do if they could choose freely.

And then there's weather. On the exceedingly rare occasions when it hits 90F in Amsterdam (all-time record a whole 93, something I, even well in the north, can only wish for), it now makes for global headlines about how, boo-hoo, the world is coming to an end. In many parts of the USA, spring and fall are short, leaving little time when it's not (1) too icy to ride safely, or (2) reaching well into the 90's F or at least the high 80s and probably with a sky-high dew point. In that kind of stifling heat, virtually unknown in Amsterdam, one's office mates will simply not tolerate one's failure to wash up and change clothes unless the distance is very, very short (see first point above.) So, might as well wear something that's comfortable on the bike, rather than lug all sorts of heavy fenders and guards up and down hills in the heat in order to accomodate flouncy clothes one will need to change anyway. (Another alternative is the Tokyo-area approach, to carry, at a minimum, several freshly washed shirts or blouses to change into every couple of hours over the course of a perfectly normal steaming, sauna-like summer day.)

Oh, and I was forgetting the ultra-flat terrain of Holland, which beats out by a long shot many areas in the allegedly flat U.S. midwest. I wouldn't care to try to get the perfectly normal $20 single-speed Amsterdam junker bike up and down the hills of San Francisco several times a day, or up and down Midwestern hills in the heat of a 95F early evening commute (heat aggravated by our corrupt Congresscritters with their Daylight-Saving Time.) But then again, Amsterdammers never need to - the highest terrain for many miles around would be the motorway overpasses.

As to the helmet issue, well, with respect to smoking and leaded gasoline, Europe lagged fifteen or twenty years behind the USA. So I think the jury is very much still out on what the 'elf'n'soifety Puritans will forcibly impose in Europe, as they have all long since run out of important things about which to get their undies all in a bundle. Stay tuned.

In summary, while I'm aware that a very peculiar national self-hatred seems to be de rigueur among many leftists and environmentalists in the USA, when all is said and done, it is not terribly helpful always to view things in snarky terms ("We think it's just for sport. Cyclists in Bruges and Amsterdam think of it as life.") based on apples-to-oranges comparisons that fail to compare, and fail on no less than multiple physical and social dimensions.

Paul, this is a very eloquent answer to the complaints of Ammond and others about North American cycling. There are certainly some North American inner cities that lend themselves to the Amsterdam style of cycling, but they are the exception. (Central Montreal is an example, maybe).

On the whole, North American cycling must be competitive with the automobile. Most of us commute significant distances across relatively low-density neighbourhoods. To use a bike as a serious substitute for a car means having a fairly good quality road bike and not being afraid to work up a sweat. I often wear my regular pants and shoes, but always wash up and change my shirt when arriving at work.

Recently my car insurance expired and I haven't rushed to renew it. This morning I had an appointment before work in a rather out-of-way spot. There was no way I could get to my suburban workplace on time by bus, but I could by bike. But not an Amsterdam style bike. If that was what cycling involved in my city, I would have had to re-insure the car right away, and save my cycling for the weekends.

Ammond,

As PaulS's reply illustrates, often there are rational reasons having to do with different local conditions as to why different cultures have different practices. The Americans who look down on their fellow citizens as somehow morally defective as compared to Europeans ought to try thinking before snottily condescending. I realize that makes it harder to score status points. But it leads to a more accurate assessment of reality.

A friend of mine who lives in Amsterdam (about 3 km west of the Nieuwmarkt) has done the exact opposite, she has made a documentary about cycling in San Fransisco from a dutch perspective.
A trailer can be found at myspace under http://www.myspace.com/onlythecity

Some point about the observations. I live in Amsterdam and cycle through the Nieuwmarkt quite often.
Dynamo light systems: a well maintained dynamo gives hardly any extra drag. They use copper connections which break down very easily however, for example when parking your bike. Over the past two years a new generation of cheap and hardly energy using LED clip-on lights have become available and are now legal as long as they are fixed to a bike (not a coat for example). Dynamo's are on the way out.
The location: the pictures were taken in front of a police station, what he saw seems to be legal.
Bike locks; Amsterdam has specialized bike thieves who tend to concentrate on on type of lock so the trick is to have two wildly different lock. Leaving your bike unlocked is illegal in parts of the city. Many types of O-Locks are vulnerable as 'mother-keys' are circulating which can unlock all lock of their type. D-locks are easily opened by using their rigid moment arm. They're nice for locking yourself to a fence, they are useless for securing a bike.
And after stealing they will be repainted .
Safety: whatever you do in Amsterdam traffic, don't go native. Rent a bike firtsso Amsterdam cyclists can see you in advance and try to keep to the traffic rules which are practically the same as in other right side of the road countries. Amsterdam cycling is like driving in Milan; it works as long as everyone has the same reflexes.
When moving to Amsterdam from another dutch town it took me half a year to get used to this. I'm still not a real Amsterdam cyclist, I stop when having a mobile phone conversation and I try to cycle on the right side of the road as long as that does not kill me like in the Haarlemmerstraat.
I seriously dislike the 'children in bucket' application as other cyclists and car drivers can hardly spot these things when overtaking one. The classic large transport bike is much safer.
The small wheel bikes are folding bikes. It is illegal to take a bike in dutch trains between 0400 and 0900 and between 16.30 and 1800. Folding bikes folded to maximum luggage size (70*40*40cm) do not count as bikes so they can be carried.
So they are either going to a railway station or coming from one.

I'm a cyclist myself - note my username - but only for exercise/cross-training in full kit, not for transportation. Bicycling in regular clothes may work in some temperatures zones (i.e. cooler) but as you move towards warmer climates it's not possible to ride a bike for transportation without arriving at your destination in a puddle of sweat. Even walking results in huge sweat spots when you reach your destination. So bicycling & walking does not work for all geographical areas.

After the collapse of public transportation in New Orleans post-Katrina, I saw quite a few office workers commuting by bicycle from late September till April/early May. Not wearing coat and tie (either in bag or @ the office, but white or blue long sleeve shorts and suit pants.

Even in New Orleans, the weather is not so bad for a 1, 2 or 3 mile bike ride at moderate speed in the cool of the morning.

Alan

BTW: Maybe 5% to 8% (1 in 20 to 1 in 12) New Orleanian bicyclists wear helmets.

It comes down to the trade off of what is more important, getting to work or being sweaty. I agree that today, it is not socially acceptable to arrive at work sweaty. But the future might be different.

At my work (in the DC suburbs where it gets quite warm and humid) we have a shower, and a growing number of employees are biking in. We have over 1000 employees at my site, so a shower room is little overhead for us, and the same cannot be said for a typical work site.

I live in Austria... Today it was 30°C and about 200 bikes were in the park platz at work. Including mine (and I do wear a suit & tie). During the winter with 10-15 cm of snow that number will drop down to about 75 bikes parked out front. So while cycling & walking may not work for all commutes in all geographic areas, it can work for far more than many people realize.

All of the points against cycling are arguments of convenience. I too work in an office environment that requires at a minimum 'office casual' as acceptable dress. In South-Western Ontario Canada, where I live, the humidity can reach Amazonian proportions and as such you WILL arrive sweaty.
Solutions are simple work-arounds:

1) purchase a decent backpack or set of panniers for your bike.
2) choose to pack clothes that either do not wrinkle, or wrinkle minimally (the few wrinkles drop out quickly with body heat)
3) pack a wash cloth and a small towel. (leave the bath sheets at home - this is about function, not luxury)
4) pack your deodorant/antiperspirant (and soap if you feel you will truly need it).

All of these items MIGHT add 10lbs to the total weight of your bike (which for most of us is equal to the minimum amount of weight we will loose by choosing to bike instead of driving so the weight point is moot)

Even if your place of work does not have a shower, they ALL have a washroom. And unless you are exceptionally stinky when you sweat, a simple wipe down of your body with a cool wet wash cloth will be more than sufficient (fresh sweat doesn't really stink horribly, OLD sweat does, and fresh sweat wipes off your body easily). This method is also known as a 'sink bath'
http://www.wikihow.com/Take-a-Bath-in-a-Sink,-Bucket,-or-River
(note: I do not condone the wasting of paper towel as they use it in that how-to)

This really isn't rocket science and I'm rather dumbfounded that while many here at TOD can comprehend some of the higher science put forth, but come up with extremely weak arguments why something just cannot be done by them.

As for going shopping or whatever other discretionary trips you have to make. Either choose times that are cooler, wait for a cooler day, or simply go slower.

As I sit here, I just got back from a 10 mile bike ride over rather hilly terrain with mixed paved/gravel trails, road, and rough forest trails. I have not showered and hey, my deodorant is doing its job just fine. I would be completely comfortable riding in a crowded elevator.

I will agree, the bicycle is NOT the most convenient thing, but then again, neither is peak oil.

I've been playing around with electric assisted bicycles, and can't say enough. I feel as though I could ride forever, and never break a sweat even in hot smoggy Los Angeles. Obviously China figured that one out already. Check_out_and_share www.peakaware.com

Thanks for this. Absolutely loved seeing the pictures. I went for most of my life without wearing a helmet even in the worst traffic. Finally gave into peer pressure (my wife) but still think it might be a bit too risk adverse unless you are racing. On the other hand, I wonder if they have a lot of accidents in Amsterdam based on having multiple riders, using cell phones, etc. May have more to do with the respect from the autos versus the skill of the riders.

After many years of road racing (bicycle) I have a hard time not wearing a helmet. It is like not wearing pants or something.

The only problem with commuting here in the mountains of Western North Carolina is the mountains. I am really in shape and a 5 mile commute is just a miserably sweaty adventure. Although it is not like stinky sweaty causing an odor problem in the office. Just I walk in the office and am immediately frozen by the AC with damp clothes.