Some people are looking a year, or two, into the future.

And, FYI, we imported about 400,000,000 Gallons of "tariff-free" ethanol this year; and, we'll import about 600,000,000 gallons of "tariff-free" ethanol in 09'.

BTW, that "duty-free" ethanol gets the $0.51/gal Blenders Credit just like Domestic ethanol does.

Great!

You go buy the stuff --- and subsidize the lazy native ethanol farmers and brewers.

Now, let the free market decide whether we want gasoline (pure) and is willing to pay for it, or that blended stuff.

Can the tax credit so I don't pay it each time I buy a steak, have corn flakes, pork chops, chicken, or everything else that corn and grains go into.

I don't need to be reminded of the power of this corrupt ethanol lobby every time I buy groceries.

Quite frankly, I would pay a nice premium for gasoline just to put these ethanol tax thieves out of business.

Yeah, you liked it better when I was subsidizing you every time you ate a steak, or a bowl of corn flakes; Didn't you?

Lazy, "Native" ethanol farmers? Okey, dokey. I think we've got YOU figured out, now.

You are free to go to Washington to demand an end to agricultural supports and any subsidies on cattle, beef, pig and pork production.

Let's put the Department of Agriculture out of business.

While we are at it... Department of Energy has got to be pretty high on the list too....

Is it a viable proposition to increase the supply of ethanol by increasing imports from Brazil and other tropical countries? I understand that there would be some resistance from the farm lobby. But if we could do this incrementally, maybe it is implementable. Thus we can reduce the price of ethanol and reduce the amount of corn going into biofuels and reduce impacts on food costs.