42 comments on When CHOPS are not a dinner menu, but for heavy oil production
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
42 comments on When CHOPS are not a dinner menu, but for heavy oil production
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Google search
Advanced search
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- How do we maintain adequate phosphorus and potassium levels for crops?
- What should we do with funds set aside for retirement?
- Leading the Way to a Low-Energy Future
TOD:Europe
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Electric Vehicles: The End Of Australian Manufacturing ?
- Upcoming Forum In Sydney: 'Peak Oil - Is this the end of civilisation as we know it ?'
- From Counterculture To Cyberculture: The Life And Times Of Stewart Brand
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“He that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils, for time is the greatest innovator.”
—Francis Bacon, Essays
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Dave Murphy, Engineer-Poet, Glenn, Heading Out, Jason Bradford, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Nate Hagens, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:ANZ: aeldric, Big Gav, Phil Hart
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
A valuable primer on heavy oil, particularly the explanation of the tradeoffs involved in extracting more of the oil in place.
The Venezuelans have 1 trillion barrels of oil, and much of it can be extracted for $1 a barrel? Um. Um. Um. Um. I realize it's not that simple....still. Um.
Once you've extracted the oil, you have to refine it into a usable form (ie into normal, lighter crude). That costs more money.
$1 per barrel to extract? That's it, folks! Peak Oil has been officially CANCELLED for the forseeable future.
Fire up the Hummer production lines!
Pave over those organic victory gardens with fresh asphalt!
Let the American consumer know it's time to end the "psychological recssion" and start SPENDING!!
Regulars here should donate their Paul Erlich, Matthew Simmons & Kunstler books to the library and stock up on Julian Simon, Duncan Clarke & Larry Kudlow.
CRISIS IS OVER, PEOPLE --START CONSUMING AGAIN!!
Yes good news. Time to get back to skydiving.
I'll guess I'll go back to reading junkscience.com and the CO2 problem now.
There is always something on the internet that can destroy the world as we know it.
You just have to use the FSE to find it.
Over and out.
False Dichotomy Fallacy
There's a world of choices between "we're doomed" and "we're saved", and they're pretty much all more valid than either.
***
The world has an enormous amount of heavy oil. Producing heavy oil requires an enormous amount of infrastructure. Infrastructure doesn't magically appear overnight, even if you have the money to pay for it.
It's not easy to get high flow rates from heavy oil.
It's entirely possible that the world will be producing increasing amounts of heavy oil for decades to come, and that doing so will have virtually no effect on the timing of peak oil. That doesn't make it a savior and it doesn't make it useless; it just makes it another factor to consider.
You know I was being facetious, right?
The quote was from 2006, and times and costs have changed considerably since then, but what I was trying to use the quote for was rather than showing how much they had, how slowly there were likely to be able to produce it.
As the remaining oil to be extracted goes from the thinner sweeter crudes to the heavier ones so it flows less easily and production problems will increase. Being able to produce something at low cost, if the yield is also slow will not be a great help in the future, even if the reserve is large.
Very good presentation HO. About 20 years ago a piece of down hole equipment was developed to produce those "wormholes". It was a series of water jets that quickly cut channels back (60' or so) into the formation. The high flow rate described is rather unique from my limited experiences with heavy oil. Commonly a lack of reservoir drive energy is as much a problem as the viscosity. The subject formation must have had a strong drive. In south Texas there are hundred of millions of bbls of stranded oil that’s actually high quality but unrecoverable due to its viscosity. Here, too, water flooding doesn’t work due to bypass. Perhaps CHOPS is worth investigating for those fields. Some of the oil is as shallow as 400’ and demands a premium price over WTI.
Venezuela is a natural focus for such efforts given its proximity. About 15 years ago a company bought a field in Vz making around 400 bopd. A redevelopment with horizontal well bore quickly increased production to 40,000 bopd. Unfortunately the company had no incentive to increase production any further. Their contract with the Vz gov’t required the gov’t to receive 100% of all production greater than 40,000 bopd. Given the current Vz gov’t the technical difficulties may be overshadowed by the politics.