Invading us Canadians would be about the worst idea americans could come up with.

They've tried to do it on 3 seperate occasions before. Twice we stopped them, and once we beat them back so far we burned down the whitehouse (which was actually pink at the time and white was the only colour that would effectively cover up the char from the fire)

note the correct spelling of the word 'colour', eh!

I think something was left out of my US public school education. Please share a few details about these attempted invasions and the charred Pink House...

Greg,

"I think something was left out of my US public school education. " I'll bet, this is from wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_of_Washington

The attack was in retaliation for the U.S. invasion of York, Upper Canada (now Toronto, Ontario, Canada), at the Battle of York in 1813, in which U.S. forces looted and burned the city, including the Parliament Buildings of Upper Canada.

So two centuries later and not much change:-(

Thanks Tony. So much for the myth that America has never been invaded...

I thought it was common knowledge that America was invaded by hordes of cowboys, get-rich-quickists, and religious nuts, from England etc., and things haven't entirely changed since.

Yes, Canada has been invaded several times, and the attempts were all beat back...by the British, not Canadians. At the time, Canada was a region of the British Empire and people largely with British and French peoples, rather than a nation as it is now.

Still, invading Canada would most certainly be a mistake...maybe just Quebec.

Please, take Quebec.

Maybe we should just force Canada to take Texas instead :-).

"by the British, not Canadians." -- ?? At that time, there was no distinction whatever. It only became possible to be a Canadian after 1867. And you might still find Canada a prickley mouthful (just kidding).

Usa would not invade canada because it already own it. See NAFTA.

Usa never let an anti-american govt elected in canada or mexico. It never let these countries make an army that could be called an army. Heck pakistan has a stronger army than canada and mexico combined both conventionally and unconventionally (nukes) inspite of

(a) being a new country (got freedom from british in 1947)

(b) going through three wars with india in between 1947 and 1971

(c) losing half of its population and quarter of its area to india in 1971

(d) in constant threats of war from india, russia, afghanistan, iran etc

Heck, if it was Pakistan we would have blown off our natural resources with our own hands rather than becoming a slave to an aggressor because of it.

The canadians need to get awake from their "glorious" part (if its a glory to be a slave in british empire). Heck it was much easier for iraqis to fight americans in 1800s but modern warfare is a much different story.

We will be all right-we have all the smart Pakistanis living in Toronto-they can help us out.

Heck pakistan has a stronger army than canada and mexico combined both conventionally and unconventionally (nukes) inspite of

(e) A per capita GDP that is 20% what Mexico has and 7% that of Canada.

Coincidence, I'm sure. It's not like foolish military spending ever crippled the economy of any other nations or anything.

Usa would not invade canada because it already own it. See NAFTA.

I suggest you literally see NAFTA, as it's obvious you don't understand what it actually says. This has been covered before.

"slave in British Empire" ? AFAIK the Canadians were not slaves, British rule gave it the decency and freedom that it wouldn't have had if other empires ruled it.
The best fate to befall backward areas was to be taken overby the British (not perfect but much better than the alternatives).

The British changed their policy toward the remaining colonies after the Revolution. If the British had treated the Canadians after the Revolution the way they treated them before the Revolution, Canada would be part of America.
Instead they treated the Canadians the way they should have treated the Americans in the first place. The British can and have learned from experience. Contrast that with the American ability to learn from our mistakes...

maybe the "best fate" for the white people. Natives and imported slaves did not fare so well. The best fate for the "backward areas" would have been for the Europeans never to have shown up. But they did, and now the European invaders are in turn being invaded. Interesting world.

No, although the best fate was never to be invaded every part of africa and asia was invaded by another. So realistically the best choice was to be taken over by Britain ( which outlawed slavery 60 years before the US and 160 years before KSA).
As far as Europe now being invaded I regard that as somewhat racist (although true). Most of the "invaders" are ex empire (North Africa to France, Caribbean to UK etc) and make for a better society. My fear is the tolerant multicultural society will be destroyed in a helter skelter after TSHTF. Interesting world indeed.

Hey bigpatty!

Do you know how to spell "Canada" without using any vowels?

- C eh, N eh, D eh?