70 comments on "Energy Resources and Our Future" - Speech by Admiral Hyman Rickover in 1957
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
70 comments on "Energy Resources and Our Future" - Speech by Admiral Hyman Rickover in 1957
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
—Big Oil Executive
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Congressman Roscoe Bartlett quotes from this speech every time he does one of his special order speeches. Problem is, he seems to be making those speeches to a largely empty room, as can be seen if you watch his most recent long enough. At Energy Policy TV a list of some of his most recent speeches can be found here. In the description of his most recent speech on the Energy Policy TV web site there is a link to Rep. Roscoe Bartlett's web site, where he links to the Rickover speech.
It is sad that this gentleman, whatever his motives, has been trying to raise awareness of these issues for over three years and you still need to make a key post containing this speech. Maybe you could link to this speech in your overview?
Alan from the islands
It belongs in the sidebar, defcon 4.
I've read this speech several times and always find myself wondering about Rickover's background and education. Excepting climate change, I don't have any better understanding of Peak Oil and resource depletion now in 2008 than he did 50 years ago. He's clearly made of different stuff than Petraeus or Colin Powell. Probably the times trained and demanded different stuff.
cfm in Gray, ME
Being father of the nuclear navy, he must have had some wits. He is one of those people about whom the term genius actually applies. My definition of a genius is one with extreme intelligence, excellent memory (I console myself with the thought that but for a weak memory... ha-ha...) and the insight to apply them effectively.
I've no doubt of his genius.
Cheers
ccpo -
There is no doubt that Admiral Rickover was a brilliant and highly perceptive man. But he was no angel, either.
He was a master at ruthless bureaucratic in-fighting, was extreme adept at shamelessly cultivating powerful congressmen to ensure generous funding for the Navy's nuclear program. He also had a well-deserved reputation as a vindictive SOB and a real tyrant to work for.
He certainly didn't get to the position he did by being a nice guy. Being a small, scrawny little fellow, and a Jew to boot, must have made for very tough going when he was a midshipman at Annapolis in those less enlightened days.
OK. Does personality have anything to do with genius?
Cheers
The first problem is convincing people that Peak Oil is real.
Then, they must understand that alternative energies will help little and will actually makes matter worse by accelerating oil depletion.
Then, you have to change national policy, but that is determined by constituent and interest group pressures.
Then you have to change international policy. Because the demand for oil is so high, it will always be higher than production; thus the depletion rate will continue until all recoverable oil is extracted. Thus the U.S. cannot conserve its way out of this catastrophe even if every car was permanently parked starting today. The U.S. is 1/4th of the consumption of oil.
A good, decent, and credible member of Congress can only get 15 colleagues to join his Peak Oil caucus. So Bartlett can't even get policymakers to step one.
So goes the Titanic.
The first problem is convincing people that Peak Oil is real.
Once oil production begins to decline it seems that people will be convinced very quickly, albeit belatedly. With a production decline, talk of speculators causing the problem immediately stops. I guess that "above ground factors" can still continue in various forms, but will have to become much more specific and come with an "expiration date" if they are going to continue to promulgate a "late peak oil".
Of course, most everyone has been late to the party including myself and most of the posters on this site. The time to start talking about Peak Oil and solutions was decades ago. I am amazed that Rickover did so so long ago. The economists and financial pundits of the day must laughed at him.