228 comments on DrumBeat: August 13, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
228 comments on DrumBeat: August 13, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
- The US stimulus and "green jobs" for wind energy
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 13th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”
—Mark Twain
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
RE: Human activity, El Nino warming West Antarctic: study
This is an important finding, given that warming in the Antarctic has been somewhat less than that predicted by climate models. The apparent reason is the depletion of the Ozone over the Antarctic, which produced a "Hole" in the ozone layer.
For those interested, the ozone layer is measured in Dobson Units and is typically about 300 Dobson units. At that level, if all the ozone were brought down to the surface as a single layer, it would be only 3 mm thick. If that layer were a liquid with the density of water, instead of a gas, the layer would be thinner than a sheet of plastic food wrap. It's a good thing the world's governments agreed to limit emissions of FREONS, which were destroying the ozone layer, else we'd be headed for extinction.
E. Swanson
Southern Hemisphere sea ice trends in extent
This should interest you. Note that the current year had dropped below BOTH the long-term baseline and last year.
Cheers
This past year, after the astounding melt in the Arctic, the maximum extent was greater than the previous maximum, but somewhat less than that seen in the long term average. The sea-ice situation around the Antarctic looks a bit different, with the minimum being above both last years and the long term average, but (from your link), the maximum extent appears to be heading to a bit less than the long term average. Since the Antarctic ozone hole appears in the spring before the melt season, it would be reasonable to point to the climate impact of ozone for the increase in minimum extent around the Antarctic. One must remember that ozone is a Greenhouse Gas and it's decline could well produce a local cooling. There are also reports that suggest a connection between the strength of the Antarctic Polar Vortex and the decline in the ozone.
E. Swanson
The important thing is the mass, not just extent. Greater extent is good in that the higher albedo reflects more energy, but it being winter the benefit is mitigated. But we should not discuss extent without discussing concentration and thickness. The ice that grew was thin. (Also, the max extent wasn't "somewhat less" than the baseline, it was significantly less. 1 million sq. miles or more.) Thus, even though we had a larger extent, it melts quickly under any stress, which is why we saw strong melt in early spring and then this August.
As of this writing, they are all three tied. What interests me about the large drop in Antarctica is that it 1. was a drop of about 750,000 sq. m in a short time, and that the second large drop after the initial roughly equaled the timing in the Arctic August melt. I don't think the two are considered closely connected, but it is curious. Almost certainly serendipitous, but still...
The main effect on the Antarctic weather from the ozone whole is thought to be that it enhances the meridional cirulation (the strong winds that blow around the continent just to the south of it). This tends to bottle up the cold air formed over the continent. The effect of this is that the continent cools, because its exports of cold air are reduced. Presumably as the ozne hole heals, this mode will weaken somewhat.
The winds which make up the Antarctic polar vortex are zonal winds, that is, they flow along the lines of latitude, west to east, AIUI. Meridional winds blow north-south. I don't quite understand the reason for those zonal winds, something to do with the Hadley and Ferrel "cells" and the resulting jet stream. Anyway, as the CFC's (and other ozone destroying chemicals) in the stratosphere continue to decline, it's to be hoped that the "hole" will no longer appear.
E. Swanson