I knew LNG imports were down never really paid attention to exports. I assume that they go to eastern canada and maybe some into Mexico ? I don't think thats a permanent condition once prices are right we can attract LNG import again.

In the link below they actually think that LNG should be heading higher.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080&refer=asia&sid=aqPVo2P33wn8

Cargoes of LNG, which is gas chilled into liquid for transportation by tankers, may rise to as much as $25 per million British thermal units in the Northern Hemisphere winter, said John Harris, a director at Cambridge Energy Research Associates Inc. in Beijing.

Ouch. That is 300% more than we paid last winter, on average. The US uses about 3x as much NG as the whole world market for LNG. Imagine the price spike if the US tried to get into that market in a major way.

Its a interesting dynamic even if the shale plays don't result in a overall increase the cheaper prices here keep up out of the LNG markets. Also the drilling costs for shale I've seen set it above 5 at the well head so you have a very strong floor on prices. Drop to low and drilling in the shale plays will practically stop.

Long term what may happen is US NG prices continue at a fairly steep discount vs LNG however they may drift higher or lower the problem is if we assume that NG supplies will eventually turn downward the differential between US NG and LNG might be pretty large.

So you could go along for a while with fairly cheap NG in North America but see a large price increase the moment NG supplies are not adequate and potentially even more to attract LNG supplies.

If LNG prices go high enough you could even see significant exports of LNG from the US.

The dynamics are interesting to say the least since it seems like the shale plays have economic restrictions that are pretty tight. To much NG and they go unprofitable but the decline rates are steep so within a year or so you go from oversupply to a fairly big shortage. If you keep within the price range but LNG gets expensive export possibilities creep in.

The biggest problem that I still don't have a good answer for is whats the long term production from these plays. I've seen reports that the well lifetimes in total are about 5 years so a lot of the early wells put in in 2001-2002 are finally reaching the end of their life. So basically starting this year we are starting to see the effects of decline enter into the picture. So on top of expansion we also have to replace all the wells drilled in 2001-2002 then 2003 etc.

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3673

The reason why I'm very interested is that assuming we are maxed out on rigs then effectively we are loosing a percentage of our early production each year going forward.

From the graph and assuming all of the 5Tcfa of unconventional developed in 2000 needs to be replaced in addition say 1-2tcfa of conventional decline we actually need 6-7 tcfa this year to stay flat.

This is really rough but the point is that we have reached the point that decline of older unconventional wells is now a major factor. The honeymoon period for unconventional is ending. Only a major expansion of the drilling fleet can keep gas production up.

Just looking at the plot conventional discovery and production give me the impression that it is dangerously close to the point there conventional discovery must go up now or the conventional production will fall.

I found data on conventional reserves on this page http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-060/index.html "Page Last Modified: Mon Aug 22 18:08 EDT 2005" (this date is probably not important) and the actual document here http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/WEcont/world/woutsum.pdf They put "Remaining reserves" (conventional) at 172 Trillion cubic feets but how old is the document and the data?
The document is marked with "US SURVEY WORLD PETROLEUM ASSESMENT 2000-- ..." in the lower right corner.
Data for undiscovered conventional and reserve growth conventional is marked with stars and are from 1995-1995 but remaining reserves is not marked with anything so they should be from 2000?

I followed the link abore and Jean Laherrere as extrapolated "US conventional natural gas creaming curve" between 1995 and 2005.

? What is the US conventional reserves now?

Doing the calculation with annual production 20 Tcf/a and withdraw discovery 5 Tcf/a 172/(20-5) = 11.5 years. But should it be from 1995-1996? 2000? or now?

BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2007 http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/re... put remaining reserves at end of 2006 "Natural Gas: Proved reserves" at 209 trillion cubic feet but are BP using all reserves or just conventional?

I guess it's nothing to worry about after all US has 527 trillion cubic feet undiscovered natural gas they just have to go out and find it or.