Can somebody explain to me why Georgians decided to attacked south Ossetia? what the hell were they thinking? they should stay quiet with the mighty Russian army at their doorstep!

the georgian-russian conflict shows that US promises, guarantees and mutual commitment are meaningless.

As such, allies such as poland, czech, turkey, baltic states, ukraine all have mutual committment from the US.....all are meaningless when Russia attacks them.

Uh completely false, First off Georgia is NOT a NATO country and the US never guarenteed or even said they would protect them militarily. Now Ukraine is one thing, I can't say one way or another if the US would defend her, but the other countries are members of NATO, and I can guarantee you any attack on them would lead to a full scale NATO Vs. Russia War and Russia knows this.

Maybe, but I bet Georgia is feeling pretty ****ing stupid right now for sending 2000 of their soldiers to help W out on his adventure...

Antidoomer,

Half of Ukraine is waiting for Russia to claim it. The crimea and Donbass want to unite with Russia but Russia is lukewarm to this because of the cost of rebuilding their economies. They have been struggling to rebuild their economy and are finally over the hump.They don't have the money to invest in this project. However I could see the crimea joining Russia soon as it is very strategic for harboring the Black sea fleet.

Why would Russia ever militarily attack a NATO member when it could just withhold or raise the price of natural gas?

Are ya nuts?

It's true the US never explicitly provided a security guarantee to Georgia. All it did was hold up Georgia as a model for the rest of New Europe (to use Cheney's notorious phrase) to emulate, provide military advisors, and talk extensively (if vaguely) about the benefits that New Europe could realize by cozying up to the US. Do you think it's an accident that Georgia had the 2nd largest contingent in the Coalition of the Willing? Personally I'm pretty sure they expected some kind of quid pro quo for that.

And the quid pro quo was that the US would insulate them from Russian pressure. Instead what they got was TV images of the president of the United States covorting at the Olympics while Gori burned. Fact is the whole episode has sent an unmistakeable message not only to Georgia but the other former Soviet republics about what American support is really worth when push comes to shove.

Bottom line: not a hell of a lot.

You could almost wonder what the prize here is. Clearly the BTC is undamaged and is likely to continue that way. And what do the US corporations and banks really care about whether Georgia is unified or not? However this appears to have been the catalyst that brought about the signing of the missile shield agreement with Poland. In a short time, with missiles in place, the US will have "nuclear primacy", and Russia will have no choice but to follow US corporate and banking dictates delivered by whichever president has been installed in the oval office to cater to their needs.

Russia will have no choice but to follow US corporate and banking dictates...

Most US corporations are very weak; many are going bankrupt or are seeking additional capital which dilutes equity, while others having ofshored their operations aren't really US corporations any more. The Doha trade round failed, which means the uS corporate agenda failed. The banks are in even dire straits; many financial corporations are bankrupt, trillions of dollars in caital valuation no longer exisis, and the whole of the US financial system hangs by a very thin thread of foreign investment.

In other words, the powers you say are going to dictate orders to Russia are very close to not having a pot to piss in.

Exactly right.
The events of the past 10 days have provided ample proof, if any was needed, that Russia is an ascendant power.
And the US? After 5 years of war and occupation?
Would it not seem to be prudent to Russian generals to now probe and test US force projection capabilities?
A proxy war would useful- if only both sides had reliable clients.
Absent that, the tension builds.
I thought history was over and the world was flat and now that Russia has McDonalds we needn't concern ourselves with them...remember that?
Maybe Georgia didn't have a McDonalds.

while some businesses are failing and will fail, there seems to be no real threat to the central bank, yet. Nor have the oil majors seen a decline in profits, yet. And while I agree with you that it is coming, it could be a few years off still. And yes these are the guys that are calling the shots. Cheney brought them all into a room for secret meetings in 2000, and I imagine the recent follies are the outcome of their meetings: WTC 1,2, and 7, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, and of course the continual boxing in of Russia. Anyway who do you think guides foreign policy and for what ends? It ain't you or me, except in some bazaare trickle down rational. If the world were fair Russia with all its energy would be a rising star. I think the missile shield has less to do with Iran and more to do with Russia. Do you think otherwise? If the Internaltional corporations and banks aren't calling the shots, do you think Bush and Cheney have acted independantly for the common good?

Lexington:

You are correct in your astute analysis. However Gori did not fair as badly as MSM would have you believe:

http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/29033 (Link with video)

Gori was the staging grounds for the attack on South Ossetia therefore it recieved an inordinate amount of attention in the ensuing counter-attack.

Dan

Lexington,

another disturbing aspect is the pre-text under which the USA began militarizing Georgia:

There is, however, one small kernel of truth in what is otherwise a rather self-serving argument: In 2002, when the U.S. began providing military assistance and training to Georgia, both the Washington and Tblisi claimed there was evidence of Al Qaeda hiding out in Georgia's Pankisi region (similarly, there were articles, like this one in Time, titled "Inside Al-Qaeda's Georgia Refuge"). Those early claims appear to have evaporated, however. In 2006, the Dallas Morning News ran an article repeating what many have come to believe in the years since: there never really was credible evidence of Al Qaeda in Georgia. The article quote a Tbilisi-based analyst saying: "I personally would not link al-Qaeda with Pankisi in any way whatsoever."

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/russia-tallies.html

Dan

Antidoomer, you're joking right? A full scale NATO vs. Russia war?

Do you really think NATO countries would risk a war with Russia over those ex-Russian satelite countries? I don't think so. They're just not worth it.

Hello Cslater8,

See my [N]itrogen posting at the bottom of this thread. I would hope that NATO & the US would gladly sit in the dark, if required, to avert full-on war with Russia. TSHTF when you can't get sufficient NPK to grow minimal food...

This would be quite saddening to me since I have many friends in Lithuania and know the struggle they went through to become independent in the 1990's. Of course the former satellite countries with natural resources or strategic energy infrastructure should be the ones that Russia pays the most attention to first. Lithuania's main asset (correct me anyone if I'm wrong) is their easy access to the Baltic Sea and some nuclear power plants.

Dragonfly,

Ignalina is the Lithuanian muclear plant. It's shutdown is scheduled to be completed next year. Latvia,Lithuania and Poland signed a memorandum of agreement to build a new plant. However due to lack of financing and bitter disagreements among the states it is not progressing well:

http://www.reuters.com/article/inDepthNews/idUSL0189399920080207?pageNum...

Lithuania is acting on such recommendations. With Poland, Latvia and Estonia it has discussed a new nuclear plant with capacity of between 3,200 and 3,400 megawatts at a cost of 22 billion Lithuanian litas ($9.24 billion).

But talks have got bogged down as Poland wants a third of the output and made agreement conditional upon connecting the plant to its grid. Shevaldin said the planned launch date of 2015 could be delayed at least two years, but Latvian government officials have said 2020 might be more realistic.

Russia has decided to build a Nuclear power plant in Kaliningrad and plans to sell the excess capacity to Lat,Lith and PL.
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080421/105520282.html

From wiki:

Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant is a two-unit RBMK-1500 nuclear power station in Visaginas, Lithuania. It is named after a larger nearby town Ignalina. Unit #1 was closed in December 2004, as a condition of Lithuania's entry into the European Union; the plant is similar to the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in its lack of a robust containment structure. The remaining unit, as of 2006, supplied about 70% of Lithuania's electrical demand.[1] Unit #2 is tentatively scheduled for closure in 2009. Proposals have been made to construct another nuclear power plant in Lithuania

Information on the port of Klaipeda:

http://www.portofklaipeda.lt/en.php

Dan

Antidoomer,

here is some polling information regarding the situation.

"If a referendum on unification of the former Soviet republics into a new alliance would be held today, would you vote in favour of the alliance or against it?"

Rus UKR BEL
In favour 51 45 36
Against 22 25 32
other/not sure 27 30 32

http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/14064

My own Note: 45% percent of Ukrainian people want Unification with Russia. However this encompasses all Ukraine. The percent among the Eastern part would problably approach 80-90%. Firther more this poll was taken in wake of gas pricing disputes with both Ukraine and Belarus.

"However in spite of most citizens regretting the Soviet Union dissolution the quantity of those who is ready today to vote for a unification of former union republics into a new union during a hypothetical referendum are less than those who “regret”. At that if in Russia almost a half of population (51%) voted for a new union, in Ukraine a little bit less (45%), in Belarus unification spirit is significantly weaker, here only a third of population (36%) would support unification. In Armenia 49% would vote for unification, 41% would vote against it (more than in other countries)."

Dan

Antidoomer:

Some info On Ukraine's NATO "aspirations" as the MSM likes to call it:

In regards to Ukraine joining NATO:
The poll revealed that 54.9% of respondents would vote against joining the military alliance if a referendum were to be held tomorrow, and that 22.3% would back joining NATO.

http://en.rian.ru/world/20080506/106712138.html

Why our are the leaders of Ukraine and the USA trying to drag Ukraine into NATO against the will of their people? Is this how democratic countries behave.

Dan

The Georgians had donated 2,000 troops to the Iraq effort. In return, they received training for their troops. I don't know if this influenced their belief that their troops were more competent then they were, or that the US would come and back them up.

My understanding is that the training the Georgian troops received was counter-insurgency, war-on-terrorism training. Not the sort of training that makes you competent against tanks. But evidently enough to make you think you can take them on...

I think Saakashvily miscalculated how much support he will get from his western allies. I think his plan was to take positions in the province by surprise and hold the lines against the Russian counter-offensive until the US and the west gather in support of the Georgian "territorial integrity" and against the "Russian aggression into Georgian territory".

However he did not foresee that Russians were carefully planning for exactly the same scenario. The mighty Georgian army (partially US-trained and armed) was pushed away too quickly before anyone could react. Another miscalculation - apparently he did not get prior approval by his US mentors, he just assumed they will come to aid in order to save their reputation. I don't think US would ever openly or even covertly support all of this, they need Russia too much to take that risk (to deal with Iran, for the energy projects etc.).

Interesting to speculate how much of the miscalculation on his part may have been deliberately induced by foreign diplomats?

I wouldn't speculate too much in that direction.

It could have very well been a provocation to push Russia into this war, which could be used as a wildcard against it at later stage. But the reaction of the West made me think it's not that, not this time... they were cautious in their reactions at first, and tried to exploit the alleged Russian overreaction at much later stage.

Personally I am attributing this simply to the opportunistic craziness of Saakashvily. That guy is a psycho, you can not just offer cease fire during the day and shell a city full of civilians in the night. I have nothing against Georgians, they are people as everyone else, but they are simply out of luck with their leaders - and they have a long history of that.

According to a Georgian timeline, Georgia declared and implemented an unilateral cease fire on Aug. 7, but South Ossetian militiamen resumed shelling the Georgian village of Avnevi about an hour later. Since it likely required several days for Georgia to assemble their troops to invade South Ossetia, they were probably ready on Aug. 7, and Saakashvili offered one last chance for South Ossetia to stop their attacks. Because the South Ossetian militiamen ignored it, he made his fateful move.

The timeline indicates the first Russian troops entered South Ossetia through the Roki Tunnel at 05:30 on Aug. 8. At 08:00 Georgian airplanes successfully bombed the Gufta Bridge and killed some Russian troops forcing the advancing column to take the alternate Geri-Dmenisi road. Although the time line makes no mention, the Russian air force may have prevented Georgia from bombing the Roki Tunnel which, if it had been destroyed, would have halted the advancing Russian armor gaining Georgia more time. The failure of Georgia to destroy the Roki Tunnel may have been pivotal in their rapid demise.

Even the Georgian version of the story seems to confirm that the attack on Osetia was well prepared and planned for act, not some kind of incidental decision to invade.

I also don't put much trust in the part of the story when Osetinians separatist continued to launch rockets towards Georgian villages 1 hour after the announced "unilateral" cease fire. Besides unconfirmed information, it's hard to imagine that immediate peace could have been establish before meeting with militant leaders and signing a bilateral cease fire. What exactly did Saakashvily expect - just stop firing and the others all at once to say thank you, we're stopping too? And it's hard to justify the destruction of a whole city and a full scale invasion on the basis of a few rockets. Overall it's very hard to find who's right and wrong in such messy situations, but one thing is certain - Georgian leaders did a huge a mistake by doing what they did.

What we do know is that Georgia has wanted to reassert its sovereignty over South Ossetia for many years. We also know that the US and its allies have been training and equipping the Georgians. Also, the US went to a great deal of trouble to bring Georgia into its circle of influence via the rose revolution. We also know that US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice visited Georgia in early July as tensions grew in the area and was Russia warning of a escalation due to Georgia's actions.

I do not for one minute believe that the US were not in the loop concerning Georgia's plan to attack South Ossetia. At best the US gave it a green light, at worst the US instigated the attack for strategic reasons. The US also had military on the ground training the Georgian troops at the time and its unlikely they weren't aware of what was happening. The US could have stopped it with a phone call if they so wanted.

It is also likely that the Georgian solution to the South Ossetian problem was to ethnically cleanse the area, hence their incredible onslaught on the civilian population of Tskhinvali. An onslaught that left the city in ruins and has prompted the Russians to open an investigation into attempted genocide by the Georgians.

So whatever madness possessed the Georgians to attack South Ossetia, it was madness fully endorsed by the regime in Washington. Either because they wanted the current outcome or because they thought the Georgians would get away with it. As the Russians are now dismembering practically everything the US has worked to achieve in Georgia over the last 4 years and perhaps longer, I'm assuming it was the latter.

So whatever madness possessed the Georgians to attack South Ossetia, it was madness fully endorsed by the regime in Washington. Either because they wanted the current outcome or because they thought the Georgians would get away with it. As the Russians are now dismembering practically everything the US has worked to achieve in Georgia over the last 4 years and perhaps longer, I'm assuming it was the latter.

My feeling is that even Bush would have balked it he thought large scale ethnic cleansing was planned. Perhaps Saakashvili somehow, thought he could move into S Ossetia with little opposition, presenting the world with a fait accompli. Then when the combination of Russian "peacekeepers", S Ossetia irregulars, and S Ossetian citizens violently resisted, the occupation force was likely presented with a situation they had not gamed (i.e. anticipated and practiced for ahead of time). In such a situation poorly trained and led forces could easily forget decent rules of engagement. So whether by incompetence/ failure for be ready for the worst case, or willfull intent, apparently the Georgian forces were participating in serious atrocities. We still don't know for sure if this is even the case, i.e. how much of the civilian casualties, and property destruction was the work of the Georgians, versus the Russians. In any case it was a serious miscalculation on the part of the Georgians.

Of more concern to me, is how this is playing out with respect to American presidential politics. It looks like all parties, Bush, McCain, and Obama, are acting as if testosterone sells well to the voters. We are upping the energy of the US/Russian conflict, at precisely the time when we should be damping it down. My guess is that blame is roughly 80/20 here, with the 80 being on the Georgian side, but domestic political considerations mean we are acting as if it was all Russia's fault. This does not bode well for future US Russian relations.

It looks like the Russians baited the Georgians into a trap. And I don't think the timing, right at the onset of the Olympics, was a coincidence either.

The first line of this post suggests Russia won this conflict. I don't think so. This was really a pointless display of force, which, when combined with the business issues there (Yukos, BP, Exxon, Shell, Mechel) will likely make potential investors in Russia shy away even further than they already have.

There was a message for other former Soviet allies in this, and they too got the message. But as Poland has demonstrated, it may we'll drive them away from Russia further.

"Russians baited the Georgians into a trap"?!?

So you organize a the shelling and destruction of a whole city, because you were "baited" by some claimed border incidents? Just like Israel destroyed Lebanon, because they were "challenged"? OK, you believe what you wish.

A very key point everyone here and in the Propaganda System is missing/avoiding is that Saakashvili on the eve of his invasion offered a ceasefire and negotiations dealing with the Ossetians independent status:

On August 7 Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, in his national TV address to Georgia and to the Tskhinvali region, said he was ready for any negotiations to settle the conflict with South Ossetia. He suggested Russia become a guarantor of South Ossetia's autonomy within Georgia.

http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080813/116006455.html

Thus the well deserved cries of war crimes. The "infamy" of Georgia is no different from that of Japan in 1941--pretending to negotiate in good faith while planning a sneak attack.

Overall, the end result is that very little has changed. Russia still holds all the energy cards; and as I said before, Russia doesn't need Europe or the USA, whereas they both need Russia's energy and other mineral resources. The importers are perhaps more clearly in the inferior position, and signing treaties to install technologies that are proven to NOT work isn't going to change that fundamental one bit.

Reading this info sheet about Russia's natgas exports and other related data helps one appreciate the strength of the Russain energy position and the weakness of its adversaries.

So, I post a link to an EIA infosheet and get a minus rec? It does contain a great table displaying country's % of domestic gas use comes from Russia. Or maybe it's just that I used an EIA source? Whatever. Some folks are just realityaverse.

OTOH the current Russian leadership is more or less propped up by export revenues; it's not like they can "punish" the EU/USA by reducing exports and not suffer themselves from that.

True but never forget that money is merely a psychological concept. Whereas the oil under their land is a real thing.

"... Russia still holds all the energy cards". More than true.

One-tenth of America’s electricity comes from fuel made from Russian nuclear warheads. The Megatons to Megawatts program converts highly-enriched uranium in Russian weapons into low-enriched uranium that is used in US civilian nuclear power reactors.

Russia has shown reluctance to part with it and if a worldwide energy crisis is triggered expect the worst from them regarding honoring and extending uranium supply contracts.

Ahh!! but the chain you mention has even more links,
many of them. The nuclear fuel America uses comes from
Russian sources and when depleted,(depleted Urainium)
its turned into weapons to kill and maim to further
take control of "Americas Intrests" (READ OIL) thats
under other peoples sand.
This is the only site Ive seen where people accept the
truth that Georgia instigated the aggression.
All other places have fallen victim to the MSM
propaganda that its all the former USSR's fault.

Hi Neph,

The nuclear fuel America uses comes from Russian sources and when depleted,(depleted Urainium (sic)) its turned into weapons to kill and maim to further take control of "Americas Int(e)rests" (READ OIL) thats under other peoples sand.

I take it this is just your little joke? DU and spent nuclear fuel are very different things.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium

Of course, I certainly wouldn't want to be hit by a DU shell, whether fired by an American or a Russian aircraft. There's a lot of spent DU lying around in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

"The first line of this post suggests Russia won this conflict. I don't think so. This was really a pointless display of force, which, when combined with the business issues there (Yukos, BP, Exxon, Shell, Mechel) will likely make potential investors in Russia shy away even further than they already have."

Are you kidding? The Russians really give a rat's ass about foreign investment -- they are rolling in money and will be for a long time to come. And in fact the Russians have really won big time here, they have most assuredly stopped anymore foreign investment in Georgia, especially for new pipelines, and also most likely any other pipelines in the area.
All new pipelines will go to them. And I wouldn't be surprised if the existing pipelines in Georgia never reopen. Think how vulnerable they are to "terrorist" attack, as proven just a couple weeks ago in Turkey. Very, very likely to happen again over and over in Georgia now, done by angry Ossetians.

UlfHeiden,

From Intel:

"We at Intel have a saying: Give the urgent projects to the Americans, big projects to the Indians, and the impossible ones to the Russians. The Russians can do anything, "says Steve Chase, the head of Intel's branch in Russia.

To further support your argument at this very moment the following large companies are expanding their operations in Russia. GM,Ford,Caterpillar,Bosch,Siemens,Pepsi,Coke,Intel,Mitsubishi,Hochtief,bombardier, Volvo, Magna - Actually I think every major corporation is.

The Soviet Union left Russia with a few good things(Not many).
1. The best science and engineering education system in the world
2. good mass transit.

From Global Insight:

Remarkably, today's Russia may have the right combination of talent, expertise and cost to be the location of choice for development of financial technology, specifically for complex software engineering and R&D projects. For one, Russia keeps producing: More than 2 million people work in more than 4,500 R&D centers throughout Russia, with at least 1 million being researchers and scientists. This is far more than in any other country. A vast majority of Russian software engineers and computer programmers holds MS or PhD degrees in mathematics or physics. With a significant R&D heritage, one of the world's best educational systems and a tremendous pool of software engineers, Russia has become a key location for R&D work for many leading American and European companies. This list includes Bechtel, Boeing, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Motorola, and Sun Microsystems, among others.

Russians are known for their unconventional approach and complex problem-solving capabilities. "We at Intel have a saying: Give the urgent projects to the Americans, big projects to the Indians, and the impossible ones to the Russians. The Russians can do anything, "says Steve Chase, the head of Intel's branch in Russia. While India and China lead the way in number, overall size and revenue volume of outsourcing vendors, Russian IT companies are often built on the "boutique" vs. "wholesale" approach, focusing on solving advanced R&D problems. Thus, most large projects demanding standardized solutions are often outsourced to India, and specialized R&D tasks go to Eastern Europe.

I heartily concur.

Looking back at the dread Cold War (part I) arms race, it was amazing how well the Russians were able to keep up after being set back by WW2 and having very limited access to modern transistor technology.

The Russians also came up with some incredibly outside the box solutions, as well as some solutions to questions no one in the West had even thought of.

On the other hand, you can also see many practical details in Russian design that are overlooked or ignored by the West. For example, look at their frontline fighter aircraft. They are designed with retractable primary air intake grates, secondary dorsal intakes, and ruggedized landing gear to facilitate operation from very rough airfields. By comparison, Western aircraft all seem to assume perfectly smooth and clear wartime airfields.

The Soviet Union left Russia with a few good things(Not many).
1. The best science and engineering education system in the world
2. good mass transit.

Like most things that work in Russia, these were copied from foreigners, starting about 300 years ago. The army and the educational system from the Germans, the navy and the railways from the British (although the supposed origin of the Russian word for Railway Station may be an urban myth - look it up), architecture from the French, large-scale industrialization from the Americans, political theory from a German Jew, and the secret police (which still works very well indeed) from the Austro-Hungarians. Hence the perpetual Russian inferiority complex - never more on display than during the past week.

Sure, and America is made of, what exactly ???

привет всем моим российских спам-роботов друзей. Как погода в Москве?

Translation:

greetings to all my Russian friends spam bots. How's the weather in Moscow?

Typical summer weather comarade--warm, then showers, then warm again. Weekends at the Dacha are very quiet. For the first time in long time, life is good.

до свидания

Plucky,

I live in Philly, since you asked its a typical humid and muggy summer. We go the Jersey shoe for relief. Fortunately I am never more than a mouseclick away from Russian culture if I feel the need:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Off07yV7RA

enjoy some Zhanna.

Dan

I'd have called that Russian decadence, rather than Russian culture of which there has been no shortage over the centuries.

I recall I was in a hotel bar in Kiev some years back. I struck up a conversation with a the bartendress, young, very fit and yes very attractive. I mentioned that I was not great with foreign languages like many in the US. She mentioned that her study speciality was in linguistics and spent 20 minutes giving me, in fluent English, a dissertation on the etymology, roots and dispersion of Rus/Slavic languages. This was a bartender. While I don't recall the details of most of what I learned on the topic, it does stay with me that this might not be the sort of people to senselessly and needlessly screw with.

Ossian revenge? Very good point.

And after what has happened (whatever the physical evidence might eventually show, it is clear the Ostians already believe Georgia's attack was an attempt at ethnic cleansing)--and considering the Caucasian propensity for vengeance and feuding--this seems more than likely.

I would agree that the Georgian pipeline--and all future projects--are dead.

Which is why, as I posted below, Turkey suddenly seems to be looking to Russia, not Georgia, for future energy projects.

It is hard to believe the US thought its Georgian war through. Maybe the White House thinks it worth it to elect McCain, but the strategic cost is . . . just . . amazing.

Sure..no problem.

South Ossetia is within Georgian internationally accepted borders as even Russian maps show.
The fact is that South Ossetia was a source of drug-trafficking and crime.

It's not clear that this Georgian 'incusion' was anymore than tit-for-tat for raids by South Ossetian irregulars.

I think the entire world world was surprised at the overwhelming force and coordination shown by Russia. Obviously this has been in the works for years.

Putin was also irritated by Georgian incusions into Abkhazia, which is part of Russia's 'riveria'. The 2014 Winter Olympics is to be held in Sochi just 20 miles north of Abkhazia.

Clearly Putin laid a trap for Georgia (and Bush too).
Is it a crime to fall into a maliciously set trap?
Some people think setting up lethal 'man-traps' for burgulars is well within their property rights.
But the world-at-large (and the law) regards them as unacceptable.

In effect you are 'blaming the victim'.

Also, the Russian people are not to blame for Putonian excess. It is the act of just one man(and his obliging slaves) IMO.

As for Bush, he is responsible for his irresponsible needling of Putin and deserves condemnation and a hard slap on the wrist for that, but for VVP
it's becoming a serious international crime.

Your foaming at the mouth ignorance is barely worth a response but here it is:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/the-view-from-south-osset...

The view from South Ossetia: Joy and thanks in the land that is now part of Russia

It looks like a small Stalingrad, doesn't it?" says Teimuraz Pliyev, 62. "Barbarians! Look – this is Georgian democracy. If it weren't for Russia, we would already have been buried here."

"Georgians" and "Genocide" come up again and again in these crumpled streets, always in the same breath.

"I saw a Georgian soldier throw a grenade into a basement full of women and children," rages Sarmat Tskhovredov, 28, who joined to fight on the spur of the moment. "The young men ran, but the women and the infirm who could not leave were shot like dogs."

dparkins,
Ever wonder how ethnic Russians in Tbilisi feel?

http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1071955.html

Forty-three-year-old Ilya serves as an acolyte at the Russian Orthodox Church named after Aleksandr Nevsky in Tbilisi. He arrived in Georgia from his native Volgograd seven years ago.

Ilya says he's praying the confrontation between Russia and Georgia does not end up affecting ordinary people like himself living in Georgia. Already, hundreds of Georgians have been expelled from Russia for alleged illegal immigration. Russia has imposed a series of measures against Georgians living in Russia, despite Tbilisi's release of four Russian soldiers accused of spying.

Ilya says the deterioration in relations between Georgia and Russia has not yet been reflected in his life. "I am from a simple, working, peasant family," he says. "I got married in 1991. Fate brought me here in 1998 together with my child, and I stayed. For me, personally, nothing has changed. Nothing at all. I continue to receive warmth and love, the lack of which I have never experienced from the Georgian people."

Family Quarrel

In the church where Ilya serves, all services are performed in the Russian language. The parish is comprised predominantly of ethnic Russians.

Sixty-one-year-old Sergei Davidov goes to the church almost every day. Davidov is unemployed. The church serves more than just his spiritual needs. Davidov always carries a bowl to church to collect soup, which the church provides for the poor, free of charge.

Davidov finds it difficult to speak about the strained relations between Georgia and Russia. "The Soviet Union is long gone, but we still consider ourselves as members of the same family," he says. "Seeing the family members quarrel naturally makes me worried. I am not experiencing any physical pressure, of course. But morally, I am very down, for we have a very bad, confrontational situation."

Deep Roots

Some 119 Georgians accused of illegal immigration were deported from Russia on October 10, the second group of Georgians to be expelled in less than a week.

Despite these tensions, School No. 72 in the capital, which provides instruction in Russian, has also remained insulated from the dispute.

Ludmila Likonzeva is the school's vice principal. Born in St. Petersburg, Likonzeva has been living in Georgia since 1968. She says the Russian government's policies bear no resemblance to the attitudes shared by the Russian people.

"We are very hurt to see all this," she says. "We keep receiving phone calls from our native towns. People call and ask us not to believe what we're hearing. We are by your side, they say. We love Georgia and Georgians. They are worried. We married Russians. This is our motherland. Our children and grandchildren are here, and we are not going anywhere. We praise our state and provide the youngsters with strength and love, so that out friendship is strong and eternal."

Rejecting Xenophobia

Anatoly, a pupil at School No. 72, says his parents are not planning to leave Georgia. "The school is very nice. I like it here a lot," he says. "I have nice classmates -- Georgians, Russians, Armenians. My sister used to also study here. Now she is a student at an institute."

Anatoly's parents, who are both ethnic Russians, run a shop in Tbilisi. Georgia's tax police, in contrast to Russia, have not started inspecting shops and restaurants on account of the owners' ethnicity.

Education Minister Kakha Lomaia says the Georgian government has no plans to follow the Russian leadership's example. "Our response is [from] a democratic, tolerant, open, pluralistic society," he says. "Our response is [based on] the values we share. First and foremost, it is to defend human rights. Georgia has always been far from xenophobia and discrimination, and this will surely remain unchanged."

No Politics In The Kitchen

Despite Russia's ban on Georgian wine and mineral water, Russian alcohol and food appear to have retained their popularity among Georgians. Matrioshka, a Russian restaurant in the center of Tbilisi, offers fine Russian cuisine.

Nikolai, who works at the restaurant, says that, despite the worsening political situation, the number of Russian food aficionados has not dwindled in Tbilisi.

Natia sips a cold Russian beer while she waits for her delivery of hot pilmenis. Is she considering a change in her culinary preferences because of the political tensions between Russia and Georgia? "No, there is absolutely no chance politics can interfere with the kitchen," she says.

This is how it is in a FREE country like Georgia.

Enjoy your dark dreams of Greater Russia!
(It's a great country with amazing people).

God save the Czar(Vladimir Putin)!!!
http://www.hymn.ru/index-en.html

Free Georgia? Now their is an oxymoron. According to Freedom house an American Neo-con NGO. They give Georgia a lower score now than when Saakashvili's predecessor was president. Maybe that is because they shut down opposition media, beat protestors to a pulp, and their interior police reign terro on all dissenters.

From Voice of America:

Much of the mistrust stems from a violent crackdown in November against protesters opposed to President Mikhail Saakashvili. His opponents accuse him of arrogance and authoritarian rule.

A crisis following the anti-government demonstrations prompted Mr. Saakashvili to call early presidential elections for January and also an earlier parliamentary vote. He won the January election, but international observers say the process was flawed.

Independent political observer Ramaz Sakvarelidze told VOA that electoral reforms since the presidential vote have not been significant. Sakvarelidze says the opposition continues to accuse officials of election irregularities, such as padding voter lists.

"The opposition has provided many examples of non-existent apartment buildings entered into election lists and also of people who have died, but are still on election rolls," Sakvarelidze said.

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe recently issued a report that notes opposition concerns about the legitimacy of voter lists. And the OSCE notes media bias, vote buying, and abuse of public resources in favor of the party in power.

Mikhail Sakashvili (file photo)
In addition, the observer group says it has confirmed several allegations of voter intimidation, despite statements by President Saakashvili and the Interior Ministry calling for public officials not to interfere in the election process.

The ministry's spokesman, Shota Utiashvili told VOA there have been no arrests for violations of election laws.

"I think," said Utiashvili, "that the Interior Ministry has opened several-dozen criminal cases and investigations of electoral irregularities are underway. He adds, however, that such cases always depend on secondary factors - if somebody, for example, was hit or kidnapped, but as far as the spokesman is aware, no serious charges have been presented to the Ministry.

dparkins, let me just say a few words in relation to your active postings and perfect knowledge and understanding of the issue.
First of all, if you are a paid commentator, please do not do it here, as it is still thought to be a form of free press not something that should reflect the views of current regime in Moscow. You seem to be in lockstep with Russia Today, but please keep your comments and politically motivated postings to yourself. Current Russian regime is anything but friendly and democratic, whichever aspect you decide to look at. And what's more, they have started active propaganda in public forums worldover. So watch out for paid commentators and comments everyone

Whether a poster is paid or not (I don't think this person is), what they write is either true or false. If it is true it should be accepted, and if it is false it can be refuted. I don't see a refutation; I see an ad hominem attack.

You are correct, the current Russian regime is not very friendly or democratic. Neither is the US. Georgia is perhaps worse than either. Ossetians have been treated very badly by Georgia for a long time, and they seem united in their desire to join Russia as the lesser of two evils. You seem to be a fan of democracy - perhaps the Ossetians should have the right to self-determination, no?

Tonis,

"paid commentator"

please ask the moderator if a certain dparkins3 registered a few months back with the same email address.

As further proof It was TOD who featured InSead's paper "Accounting for growth: The role of physical work" Which convinced me of the dire implications of PO.

Dan

Majorian, I don't agree with everything you write but I havn't given you a negative.
What concerns me is that everything you write is given a big negative rating even when what you write is mild. It appears that you are the victim of flaming by hard core fanatics that won't tolerate others opinions.
BTW anybody who thinks I'm anti Russian is mistaken. I'm glad that Russia now has the strength and balls to stand up to the neocons but saddened that (mostly) innocent Georgians are getting hammered.
cheers

I don't exert the effort to give Majorian negative clicks, but considering the quality of his comments in several areas, and particularly the tone in which they are delivered, I can't be surprised at the downgrades. I don't think it's due to 'unpopular conclusions' much at all.

Cobblers. Majorian's posts above, rating -17 and -10 respectively, are not particularly low on either quality or presentation, compared to others here.

I think those low grades of Majorian are much more to do with the low intellectual quality (superficial, stereotyping, and preoccupied with the messenger over the message) of those people who find time for the rating system (which I take not the slightest notice of myself).

What rating system? Oh, THAT rating system, the one I filter completely out with Ad Block Plus Element Hider and the following rule:

theoildrum.com#DIV(class=extra_voting_forms karma_3_big)

My eternal thanks to the TODer who originally posted that. :)

"Can somebody explain why Georgians decided to attack S. Ossetia?"

For the same reason Israel attacked Lebanon, because the Ossetians were firing missiles into Georgia. Ossetia is historically part of Georgia. The Russians have been subverting Ossetia ever since the fall of the Soviet Onion.

Of course, those on the other side of the issue claim the opposite, so choose whom you will believe.

Ossetia is historically part of Georgia.

Depends on how "historical" you want to get. Ossetia was split in half by Stalin (himself a Georgian) in 1922 and along with Abkhazia was reassigned to the Soviet Republic of Georgia (as autonomous regions) for administration purposes. Under the Soviet Union, it probably didn't matter much either way, but with the disintegration of the USSR, those peoples refused to be part of "Georgia" and fought to keep their autonomy.

Can you point to a source that confirms the Ossetians were firing missiles into Georgia, or was it really the other way around?

Me thinks you need more research, research.

Check engine, you really need a complete overhaul.

A map of the Democratic Republic of Georgia 1918-1920 (pre-Stalin) shows both Abkhazia and South Ossetia to be within the national borders as they do today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Republic_of_Georgia
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/41/DRGMap.png

Under the Soviet Union, it probably didn't matter much either way, but with the disintegration of the USSR, those peoples refused to be part of "Georgia" and fought to keep their autonomy.

You really have no idea what you are talking about.
These folks are a bunch of hillbillies.

For example just before the 1991 breakup there were far more Georgians in Abkhazia than Abkhazians. Today the country is run by an ex-bank guard.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abkhazia

South Ossetia was the center of an international counterfeiting ring in 2006. The country is run by a former wrestler who doesn't believe in democracy, rather 'caucasian values'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Ossetia

So being a hillbilly means you must face a death sentence?

Ossetia is historically part of Georgia.

What does this statement mean?

South Ossetia and Abkhazia were "given" to Georgia by Stalin (General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union's Central Committee), a Georgian.

Similarly, the Crimea was "given" to Ukraine by Khrushchev (General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union's Central Committee), a Ukrainian.

If go back a while, you will find that Georgia was part of Iran for 400 years. Does that mean that the Iranians can bomb the hell out of it and try to occupy it?

Crimean Tatars at press conference declare Crimea is rightfully theirs and demand to return to their homeland.

Circassians in a joint statement issued from Ankara demand compensation for ethnoc cleansing at hands of Russians in 1800s.

I could go on with 40 more similar claims from peoples driven from the Caucasus, Southern Ukraine, and Southwestern Russia over the last 200 years. The historical evidence is that ethno-national groups move or are pushed from locale to locale over time. The European nation-state idea with fixed national borders is an historical annomally and has caused a lot of harm. It will likely erode and then cease to exist as climate change prompts vast movements in populations toward the end of this century and the next. Borders between peoples are an artifact of competition. But if large numbers of humans are going to survive in the longrun, they must learn to cooperate, which will destroy borders.

No comment.

Karloff1 -- you make several excellent points in one short comment. Thanks for that!

I agree that we need to evolve from the competitive model -- a "Dead Ender" strategy for survival if ever there was one -- to a kind of intensive and extensive cooperative paradigm.

We are at the brink of "The Last Man Standing" Competition. No one will be around to award, recieve, or enjoy the glory of any kind of victory.

No one actually wins wars. The survivors are shaped by war in terrible ways. The consequences of reliance upon violence as our ultimate business/political strategy are upon us.

We have effectively declared war on the planet as well. The consequences of our reliance upon this violence are upon us as well.

Can we use our big brains to find a way through the Bottleneck of the next 20 years or so? That is the real question we need to direct resources toward answering. We are distracted by this petty but grotesquely destructive devotion to violence even as our potential slips from our grasp.

Georgia is one more example of local and parochial infighting inflamed by bigger competitors using the small players as pawns.

Can we use our big brains to find a way through the Bottleneck of the next 20 years or so?

Beggar--Thanks for the compliment. Numerous folks using their "big brains" have offered many suggestions as to how we can transit the "Bottleneck." But as long as the Propaganda System remains in the service of Empire and its allies, we will have a very hard time getting those suggestions broadcast and debated in the wider forum of Public Opinion. The great majority of US society has no clue about the multiple crises rolling across the Sea of Time directly at them, and instead behave like the Three Little Pigs before the Wolf arrives. But I do give the public some credit as over 80% in polls understand and state that the US is going in the wrong direction, and this % has remained that high for close to a year now, and it continues to grow.

Most of us were told to share with others by our parents as we tansited adolescence. But that is the only direction to cooperate we get from our socio-cultural milieu, as every other message promotes competition. Indeed, I think this is what starts the dysfunctioning of families--a child may love her/his parents, but the trust between them is deeply impacted by the percieved lie of sharing: My parents tell me I must share with others; but outside of home, no one shares with anyone; instead, they try to get as much as they can for themselves. I think any attempt to promote sharing is destroyed as soon as the game of Monopoly is introduced to the child. We get programmed at a very young age to accumulate and not share our wealth with others because that's how you WIN. Changing this one aspect of our socio-cultural-political-economic behavior is absolutely necessary to transcend and solve our crises by creating a new paradigm; but it is so ingrained and there are so many deeply established institutions promoting competition that I think it will be this reason why we will experience an Olduvai Gorge type of societal collapse--not because we aren't smart enough or don't have the right technology, but because we will lack the cultural tools demanded by the new paradigm.

In a nutshell:

...I think it will be this reason why we will experience an Olduvai Gorge type of societal collapse--not because we aren't smart enough or don't have the right technology, but because we will lack the cultural tools demanded by the new paradigm.

Thanks for the reply, Karlof1.

Forgive me for being slow to respond. I was working both yesterday and today -- in fact I do fairly physical "handy person" type of work, and so have to do quite a bit of that in order to earn enough American Dollars to support a family (two adopted children, no biological children) in Minneapolis, MN, USA. Therefore my time for internet conversation is limited.

I feel like our government wants our time for meaningful discussion to be limited. After all, a thoughtful and literate populace is harder to seduce and manipulate. Our corporatist government likes us Plebes to be working for enough money for food, shelter, and some measure of medical care. The shrinking Managerial Class may have leisure as long as it is spent consuming propaganda and soul-numbing stuff.

I was reminded of one of my old favorite authors on another thread at TOD today -- Jacques Ellul -- here's a Wiki quote from Ellul regarding the present existential predicament of our funny little big-brained species:

"...what is at issue here is evaluating the danger of what might happen to our humanity in the present half-century, and distinguishing between what we want to keep and what we are ready to lose, between what we can welcome as legitimate human development and what we should reject with our last ounce of strength as dehumanization. I cannot think that choices of this kind are unimportant."

Our responses to the present ecological catastrophe -- largely anthropogenic in my opinion -- will define us as a species and determine, quite possibly, whether we survive for more than another 30 years or so.

Can somebody explain to me why Georgians decided to attacked south Ossetia?

Always, always, always: cui bono? It looks like a big defeat for the US, doesn't it? But is it a defeat for the military-industrial complex? Is it a defeat for McCain and the neocons? The color revolutions took place with no small degree of US encouragement (instigation, truth to tell), the entrance of some into Nato, the proposed placement of anti-missile bases in Poland and Czechoslovakia (aimed at whom? Iran? this is an insult to everyone's intelligence) -- all this has to be considered. Who then might have instigated such foolishness, despite disavowals?

This game has been payed over and over and over again. In Iraq, Saddam was enticed into a trap: invading Kuwait. The Japanese in WW2, see Stinnett Day of Deceit.

Whether the game will ultimately work this time is another matter -- it is certainly far more dangerous. But I have no doubt the a greatly increased militarization of our economy is the game plan. It's the only card the US holds. The oil and gas card was played out long ago and is held by someone else now.

My very great concern is that TPTB are conscious of declining US relative strength, and therefore prefer a showdown sooner rather than later. Madness, yes. But this too has relatively recent historical precedents -- the guy with the mustache, remember? He knew he had to act soon or be overwhelmed by the US and the Soviets.

Oh, I forgot. Brzezinksi openly claims credit for enticing the Soviets into Afghanistan.

Note: I don't like the EDIT feature because someone who has already read a post may miss the edit.

"My very great concern is that TPTB are conscious of declining US relative strength, and therefore prefer a showdown sooner rather than later."

CORRECT

Both the US and Israel had boots on the ground in Georgia. And as so eloquently stated by Burgundy above, "it would've taken one phone call" from Washington to halt Saakashvili.

El: Shalom and thank you for mentioning the truth so
many fear to declare.I was wondering when or if the 800 lb gorrilla would get mentioned.
Heres Israel meddling in an area it has no business in
and while they dont have enough on their plate at home? Oy Gevelt!
The MSM ignores the Israeli factor like leprosy.
The people on this thread are amazing at their knowledge and reasoning.

My own guess is that there is a lot we don't know. We know that the different groups in the area dislike each other (to put it mildly), and that there was clearly a nationalistic reason why the Georgians would attack the Ossetians. However, I suspect the Russians were egging the Georgians on. After all, they were allowing the Ossetians to get Russian passports, making them defacto Russian citizens which the Russians could "protect". My guess is that the Russians, by supporting the Ossetians put the Georgians in a position that only a very level headed leader could have gotten out of without doing some sort of military action. I suspect Ossatia was moving towards secession as well, something the Georgians could not tolerate. I also note that the Russians were clearly expecting this, since they could not have fielded that military response without advance planning. The point is, I suspect that Russia had maneuvered Georgia into a position where they were all but forced to attack Ossetia, and into a position where Russia could justify invading Ossetia to defend their citizens. Not to be entirely one sided about this, I suspect that it was not hard to convince the very nationalist leader of Georgia to attack Ossetia.

I suspect that the Russians wanted this attack. They knew and know that there is no political way that they can take over control of the pipeline on this go-around, BUT (1) they have very clearly made the point that if they choose to capture or destroy the pipe it is their choice alone, (2) it clearly points out that Russia is back as a regional power and can no longer be ignored, and (3) it sets up a situation where it may be possible to take over control of the pipe line in the future. This third point could be either a military adventure in the form of another attack on Georgia, or more likely wrestling political control from the west and replacing the current government with a Russian ally.

Well you got that right. But US did the very same by actually forcing Saddam into Kuwait for example. Now you ask yourself - why did the Russians want the attack? Wasn't it because Georgia has been playing hardball against them all those years? I perfectly understand their point of view - being encircled and intimidated by much more powerful and richer competitor and potential enemy is not exactly a thing you could just stand by and watch. Now this game just got one point for Russia, but it's far from over yet. If US didn't want this to happen maybe they shouldn't have started this cold war for controlling Russian energy resources at the first place - using Georgia and other countries just as their pawns which they can sacrifice if needed.

I suspect that the Russians wanted this attack

This is probably true. Another fact on the ground is that at least 90% of Russians beleive that Georgia/USA palnned and conducted a dastardly attack, with the intent to cleanse/kill Russian citizens. It may well be that Putin, and a small circle surrounding him, successfully goaded Saakashvili into acting, but ordinary citizens, and even high ranking members of the military are out of this loop. At this point in time, it is important to give the Russian people the message, that we would never try to do that (cleanse/kill). The problem is that for whatever reason, our domestic political calculations prevent us from doing that, but instead are leading to further provacative actions. For the average Russian, this will only confirm their suspicions about our perfidty.

If our leaders, and prospective presidential candidates are acting like testosterone crazed teenagers, the first place to look for an explanation for this behavior is that the American people are foolish enough to fall for this sort of behavior come election time. The fault is not just with our leaders, but is shared by the people who fall for the same emotional/political manipulation nearly every time.

Said by enemy of state:
The fault is not just with our leaders, but is shared by the people who fall for the same emotional/political manipulation nearly every time.

The same thing can be said for the Russian people believing the Russian propaganda. The vast majority of the Russian people do not learn anything more than what the Putin controlled Russian media tell them. At various sites I have read many emotional posts from Russians finding great justification for Russia's actions based on the allegation of genocide against Saakashvili. I strongly suspect these allegations could only be "proven" in a Russian court like the one Mikhail Khodorkovsky found himself occupying.

U.S. leaders and principal presidential candidates are not acting like testosterone crazed teenagers. They are acting like loud-mouthed cowards yelling and trembling in the distance as they watch a friend mauled by a hungry bear.

"a friend" who announces on TV the previous evening that he is going to restart negotiations and restrain his security forces, and then a few hours later attacks the very people he said he would negotiate with. That person is a premeditated murderer and a terrorist--not a "friend."

I have no idea whose version of events are true but suspect both sides are lying. Georgia's version of events of Aug. 7, 2008, asserts that they did a unilateral ceasefire. About an hour later, South Ossetia signaled its refusal to negotiate by shelling various villages in Georgia. A few hours later Georgia invaded South Ossetia. I suspect that it took a few days for Georgia to prepare its troops. After becoming ready on Aug. 7, Saakasvili probably offered South Ossetia one last chance at a peaceful resolution with the ceasefire, but the South Ossetians rejected it, so he invaded. The fictional character Doctor Who usually gives the bad guy one last chance to resolve the conflict. If the bad guy takes the deal, then everybody lives. If not, the Doctor executes his plan and somebody dies. I find myself having to repeat the Georgian version because nearly everybody is emotionally repeating the Russian version without any consideration. All Putin has to do is say, "genocide" without proof to make every Russian unquestioningly believe it. Putin, a former KGB official, is the guy who crushed the free Russian press and essentially appointed the president of Russia, Medvedev, making me very skeptical of Russian reports. Russia entered South Ossetia on Aug. 8 so fast, there is no way he responded due to reports of genocide. The bear was lying in wait. No matter how Georgia attacked Tskhinvali, the Russian propaganda machine had probably already decided to label it genocide. I do not see how Russia is a saint after allegedly allowing South Ossetians and possibly Cossack volunteers to pillage Gori. In all modern wars civilians lose.

The first casualty of war is the truth. We on the outside do not really know what is happening.

The reality:

Aug. 1 - Georgia attacks South Ossetia.
Aug. 3 - South Ossetians request and are granted the opportunity to flee to North Ossetia as refugees by Russia. Putin orders the Russian 58th Army to the border. Note that this is 5 days before Russia actually enters Georgia.
Aug. 7 - Georgia announces a unilateral ceasefire. Georgia fails to convey this information to South Ossetian leadership. South Ossetian forces continue to attack Georgian forces that have been attacking them for 7 days.
Aug. 8 - Georgia continues shelling South Ossetia and targets Russian peacekeepers, killing 13 and wounding 70. Putin orders Russian forces into the fight.

There was tons of rhetoric on both sides for months before Aug. 1. Big deal. Rhetoric is not justification for military action. Georgia threw the first stone. Did Georgia have a grievance? Yes, Georgia wanted to reunify South Ossetia (and Abkhazia) with Georgia just the same way China wants Taiwan back. Was military force justified? No.

I am no fan of Putin and I agree with another TODer who called Putin a "cold blooded psychopath", but very clearly here Georgia was in the wrong. That hothead, Saakashvili, took a chance that should not have been taken. Then, to make matters worse, the US allowed the violence to continue for over a week before Russia finally entered the fight. If the US didn't want Russia in there, it should have pulled strings and shut the idiot Saakashvili down immediately.

More than anything else, the last 2 weeks demonstrate either a gross incompetence at foreign affairs by the current administration or a deliberately calculating and cold blooded attitude towards the entire world by that same administration. I can find no other viable ways to explain what just happened.

At this point in time, it is important to give the Russian people the message, that we would never try to do that (cleanse/kill).

I am not sure who exactly is included in your definition of "we", but the preponderance of evidence suggests that the US government is more than happy to cleanse (see NATO-occupied Kosovo, which has been cleansed of 98% of its pre-war Serbian, Goran and Gypsy population) and kill (see hundreds of thousands of people killed in Iraq) to reach its political goals. The Russian people would be wise to take note of that.

There is a natural choke point between N and S Ossetia.

With Russia now in a position to stop oil flow into Turkey (in addition to energy flow into Europe) it means that shipping oil to Ashkelon and Eilat can be stopped very quickly. The Russian response and presence in Georgia most likely will prevent a unilateral israeli attack on Iran by raising the cost by an order of magnitude.

That's why over 1000 israeli advisers taking part on the attack on S Ossetia in order to control the choke point.

Also explains the Gates / JCS no response position despite the unprecedented access to the neocon controlled US MSM by the stooge Saakashvili.

Also why the counter intuitive response by the markets.

Khebab,

According to some/many the Russia laid a sophisticated trap for the hapless Georgians who, innocents that they are in the big, bad, world, walked into the trap like lambs to the slaughter.

Alternatively it was the United States and their Georgian proxies that laid a trap for the Russians, by attacking South Ossetia with such violence that that Moscow was forced to react or be shown to be impotent, unable to protect its own and ripe for regime change.

The Georgian people are mere pawns in new Great Game for influence, access and control over not just the Causcasus, but the energy reserves of the Caspian Basin, and further down the line, mastery of the entire Eurasian continent.

This conflict is part of something far bigger, more complex, and very, very dangerous. Anyone who thinks or says they understand what happening in the ethnic cauldron that's the Caucasus, doesn't really know what they are talking about. It makes the Middle East and the Balkans look like a walk in the park!

For me, for starters, is the fact that the ordinary people on the ground, are regaded as expendible and are merely pawns in the game, real people, with real lives, that can be sacrificed and ignored, they don't really count and they have, in reality little value, like ants crushed under the giant wheels of a juggernaut they have no control over and barely understand the direction it's moving in and why, if they understand at all.

The very idea that Bush, of all people, after Iraq, has anything but contempt for international law, sovereignty, human rights and democracy, is absurd. God, he doesn't give a damn about democracy in the United States, so the idea that he cares about the Georgians is riciculous. When these people talk about democracy and freedom, they don't use these words like most other people do. Democracy and freedom means our right to own and control the Unitd States for our own narrow benefit and interests, and if we can get the peasants to fight and die for us, as much of the rest of the world as we can get hold of!

Putin is radically different either. He wants to see his version of Russian strong and successful too, if this brings him into confrontation with Bush, then so be it. The United States and Russia are like two Mafia clans deviding up territory between them. It's like The Godfather, which was actually a film about America disguised as a movie about the mob.

The final point is that the pawns on the board don't really don't have any substantive reason for playing the game at all, if they have enemies, it's they hands moving them across the board they should be fighting not their own kind.

The complete interview of a South Ossetian Girl on Fox.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pa_sm9XmOiA&eurl=http://www.winthrop360.b...

American Joe Mestas, in South Ossetia at the time of Georgian shelling, describes the shelling and assigns blame to Georgia.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMhq7CfMuWI



The 12 year old US citizen describes unprovoked Georgian bombing and thanks Russian forces for their assistance. Her older relative blames Saakashvili for the conflict at which point FOX feels the need to go to a commercial break. On return the older relative commences to provide her views on the source of the conflict and FOX has to end the segment with the FOX host stating there are a lot of grey areas in any conflict.


The FOX host had first person witnesses who were providing evidence he did not wish to hear so it all became "a grey area."


The degree to which the US MSM do not act to air differing views and instead reinforce the "party line" is startling.


Others have made similar comment but there is more informed opinion on TOD [and better evidence] than in the MSM. Thank you Goose, Gail, et al.