<DrumBeat: August 25, 2008 The Oil Drum DrumBeat: August 26, 2008>

164 comments on Report from 33d Intl. Geology Congress in Norway (By Charlie Hall)

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version

Bryant on August 25, 2008 - 11:50pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Please tell me you posted this link as a joke.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
aangel on August 26, 2008 - 10:32am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Well, I've spent a few hours that I don't have refreshing myself on basic geology and won't spend more time on it.

Reminded me of the process I went through learning about peak oil, but in this case I'm not so interested to follow it all the way through.

Normally I give these theories a fair hearing (like the free energy ones) because I don't think we're at the end of instances where we are collectively completely wrong about certain commonly held beliefs. (As people on this site can attest to.)

When someone says 'all of science needs to be overthrown if you accept my assertion,' that's usually a red flag for me that extra scrutiny is needed, though.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Iconoclast421 on August 26, 2008 - 3:26pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

I've seen it before a hundred times. The knee jerk mentality portrayed above. "Surely you must be joking! Yuck. Yuck. Yuck. But I'm not going to take 30 minutes to actually examine the evidence in an intellectually honest manner."

It takes great confidence to put yourself out on a limb to say that a whole branch of science is wrong. But if people did not do this, then we would still be arguing about the earth being flat. The evidence for expansion tectonics, or torsional tectonics, is overwhelming. The fact that it is relegated into perpetual obscurity speaks volumes about the level of control and indoctrination in western culture.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Cretaceous on August 28, 2008 - 5:19am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

There are so many arguments against the "expanding earth" hypothesis that it's hardly worth starting.

However, in case other readers are wondering about a simple counter-argument, the enormous variation in the age of the major parts of the continents (e.g. North American cratons, colour-coded below) is completely unexplained by an "expanding earth".

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
DaveMart on August 28, 2008 - 2:07pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

I found the videos fascinating if rather uninformative as they did not specify what the 'simple rules' were by which the fits were made.
Without that information it is impossible to determine how good the fit really is, or if liberties have been taken.

One thing which immediately occurs is that if the oceans are only 180 million or so years old, why did expansion only start then?

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

164 comments on Report from 33d Intl. Geology Congress in Norway (By Charlie Hall)

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version