<DrumBeat: August 25, 2008 The Oil Drum DrumBeat: August 26, 2008>

164 comments on Report from 33d Intl. Geology Congress in Norway (By Charlie Hall)

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version

Cretaceous on August 28, 2008 - 5:19am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

There are so many arguments against the "expanding earth" hypothesis that it's hardly worth starting.

However, in case other readers are wondering about a simple counter-argument, the enormous variation in the age of the major parts of the continents (e.g. North American cratons, colour-coded below) is completely unexplained by an "expanding earth".

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
DaveMart on August 28, 2008 - 2:07pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

I found the videos fascinating if rather uninformative as they did not specify what the 'simple rules' were by which the fits were made.
Without that information it is impossible to determine how good the fit really is, or if liberties have been taken.

One thing which immediately occurs is that if the oceans are only 180 million or so years old, why did expansion only start then?

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

164 comments on Report from 33d Intl. Geology Congress in Norway (By Charlie Hall)

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version