 | The Bullroarer - Monday 1st September 2008 | The Oil Drum: Australia/New Zealand | The Bullroarer - Thursday 4th September 2008 |  |
6 comments on The Bullroarer - Tuesday 2 September 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
6 comments on The Bullroarer - Tuesday 2 September 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
User login
Contact
- anz at theoildrum dot com
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
GAIA Host Collective
There is an excess of words on the lack of water in the Murray-Darling system but litle progress on doing anything meaningful about it.I seem to remember that Rodent 1 made a big noise about the Commonwealth taking control of the basin.Rodent 2 and W(r)ong are making the same sort of noises on this issue(and many others)but are,characteristicly,doing sweet damn all of nothing.Meanwhile all state governments concerned are doing their own selfish and shortsighted thing.All these goverments are Labor.It is sad that the alternative governments don't appear to "get it"either.
The bleeding obvious fact is that there is way too much water being extracted.There is way too much interference with the natural order in the form of dams,weirs and off stream storage.
This situation,a long time in the making,has been exacerbated by drought.Since when was drought an unusual phenomenem in Australia?The already wild variations in our rainfall patterns will very likely become even more wild with climate change.
Unless we get some intelligent,courageous and effective leadership very soon Australia is headed down a short and rough road to disaster.
I agree - there does seem to be a lot of noise without action.
Rodent 2 and co are an improvement on Rodent 1's reign of terror based fearmongering and general apathy to doing anything about the issues that matter, but there is still a long way to go to fix problems like the Murray.
I'd much rather have *extinct* State Governments and a surviving river system, rather than the other way round, but there we are.
;-)
You're quite right Thirra. Over-allocation. Even more amazing is that farmers who have no physical water available can apparently sell their "rights" so that some other bastard can over-extract from one of the few remaining pools !
How is it that a government hand-out from many years ago must now be repurchased at huge expense by the taxpayer? Why can't we just turn it back into nothing again without having to pay? Just say, "So long and thanks for all the salination, guys!"
I heard the other day that the highly desirable shire of Coleambally has even offered us a "job lot". - All of them will walk away for a mere $3.5 Billion...(!) The only minor problem with this is that these rice growers have no *actual* water to release into the Koorong, or anywhere else, just 3.5 Billion dollars worth of paper "rights" to sell back to the taxpayers!
I think you are being a bit harsh.
Licenses come with fees.
In WA many farms were sold with conditions that a certain percentage of the land be cleared.
A legally binding right, even with the environmental damage caused is still binding and a valid instrument. If it was an error to issue it... who should bear the burden?
If farmers purchased land and licenses from the agents of society in good faith, should they be punished for following the advice, or behaving in the legally, if misguided, ways advanced by the major economic ethos of the age; growth at all costs?
These licences and rights were issued on our behalf, and farmers have been encouraged to behave in particular ways. We issued them, and we collected the yearly fees to build the infrastructure to promote certain economic activities. So maybe we should purchase them if it produces an overall reduction in water use.
If you really believe what you say, then I guess it should be fine for Governments to just rescind your house ownership, which is just a "right" to occupy a plot, when they want to build a freeway thru your backyard. Obviously you needn't be recompensed.
;-)
PS
I totally agree that over allocation is a/the big issue and that our use of the landscape needs rethinking.