Yes, move quickly into the fire, the frying pan was getting hot.

ONLY when we know what we are doing. we are already messing with the climate one way, hastily doing it in another way to try to stop the effects of the first way will be the death of us. Geo-engineering to try to keep the planet the way we want it instead of using the energy and money to adapt to the new environment is a huge mistake.

a more apt analogy is that we are a blindfolded bomb tech, trying to defuse a bomb that has no timer, while someone screams in our ear's to just cut wires till it stops ticking.

Conservation is instantaneous

If you care about your childern
and the people yet to come
best you think about tomorrow
and just slow that Hummer down

What you posted were not "ripostes". They were rude, crude, all-caps trash. I tried "riposting" to one of them, but by the time I was done, I was "replying to a message that doesn't exist". Which is a good thing.

Are you drunk tonight or something? The stuff you wrote is really not in any way useful, and you should be glad that very few people saw it.

So you're suggesting we should continue the experiment we have underway already, and continue dumping millions of tons of CO2 into the air every year?

There's a 5% chance that branch you are sawing isn't the one you're sitting on. Don't bother to look, just saw faster!

(hint: any credible climate model already includes insolation and water vapor)

the sooner Hansen is shown up for the fraud he is , the better.

Support this. You may, for reasons noble or otherwise, disagree with the man, but I have never seen any claim he is a liar of any sort before. I will be locating contact info for him and forwarding your libelous comments to him. I doubt he will care, but I will feel better.

I would also like to see why the impact CO2 is way above and beyond impact of the following:

Water Vapour
Solar Activity

You appear to have zero interest in the truth as evidenced by the fact the above has already been explained on these forums. To you, I believe. Here is a thorough explanation: Water vapour: feedback or forcing?

How about some Pliocene Greenland ice build up due to (gasp!) a fall in CO2.

The following is a nice of example of how all your heroes do their work:

How to cook a graph in three easy lessons

And here is THE study on how the skepticism is all bull hockey: Smoke, Mirrors
& Hot Air (.pdf warning.)

The report documents that, despite the scientific consensus about the fundamental understanding that global warming is caused by carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping emissions, Exxon-Mobil has funneled about $16 million between 1998 and 2005 to a network of ideological and advocacy organizations that manufacture uncertainty on the issue. Many of these organizations have an overlapping—sometimes identical—collection of spokespeople serving as staff, board members, and scientific advisors. By publishing and republishing the non-peer-reviewed works of a small group of scientific spokespeople, Exxon-Mobil-funded organizations have propped up and amplified work that has been discredited by reputable climate scientists.

I repeat my challenge: Show me ONE scientifically sound, peer-reviewed, published study refuting global warming that has not already been shot down by real science and real scientists.

You cannot, so why do you persist?

Jeers

EDIT: E-mail sent. No, I don't expect a response,but, you know what?, I DO feel better.

"the sooner Hansen is shown up for the fraud he is , the better."

He is not a fraud.