It's a nice distraction for the masses.

It gives people the impression there really is some Ken Lay etc types to blame, and then we even get to watch the trials on television.

Boring... Another boring collapse where everyone is asleep. At the end of the age of enlightenment even. Who'd a thunk it.

Actually, there are some criminals at the heart of the matter--those that naked shorted the system and started the collapse, floks like Einhorn and Rocker, and their "journalist" accomplices. I'm sure Overstock.com's CEO could give you a good list for starters, as could the folks at NCANS. Most of the top people at the SEC need prison terms, but then so does Bush, Cheney, Rice, Powell, and the rest of that crew.

These guys think they should be jailed, see "How to create an Angry American"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgfzqulvhlQ

It looks like some people get away with lying.

Few have taken what I've said about how this crisis started seriously. It was started by Goldman Sachs. At the time, I was a shoreholder in NFI, the very best of the sub-prime brokers, which is bourne out by their still being in business and have yet to default on any bond payment. So, I was a witness to what happened, although it took some time to understand the how.

I offer this as further testimony as the author's financial credentials far outweigh mine. A sample:

When Goldman Sachs conjured up something called the ABX index by bundling up mortgages into billion dollar batches and selling them into the market, the industry responded as it should have. The market rocked. Novastar kept to their conservative underwriting and contributed like the rest of the industry by funding those indexes. But then something strange began happening. Massive short interest and even more massive naked short interest built in the Novastar market. Millberg Weiss sued (and lost). Novastar dropped from a high of near $70 to around the mid $30s. Novastar was still making $$. Their portfolio was performing within the model. The dividend was huge. But that was just because those pesky shorts had overdone it with the share price. They would pay. It was certain........

Then Goldman Sachs started massively shorting the very same ABX indexes they had just invented and sold to their investors. The shorting was merciless. The ABX index was small. It was a piece of cake to dominate the market with short sales. The prices on the indexes dropped clear out of sight.

There's much more evidence as to Goldman's criminal responsibility. And just who was heading Goldman at the time? Paulson.

Here we have bob o'brein recap how the media failed even when it was shown just what was happening and how. Some may remember this full page ad placed in the 8 FEB 2005 WaPost that detailed the caause of the coming crisis and demanded accountibility.

Now we have the Robber-in-Chief trying to rob every US current and unborn to the second generation citizen. IMO, all the members of BushCo need to experience the Bonny and Clyde treatment.

Yikes. Have seen references to this before and just started reading more about it. An article in Money magazine a few years ago described Paulson as being very interested in wildlife....especially birds and predators, and how the latter maintained their position in the top of the food chain. He also is fascinated by snakes. While I like wildlife and animals too, I'm struck by the analogies here...predators and snakes. So what are they planning...should we look forward to a world oligopoly? Also, I guess that means that any investment in the stock market is sort of like throwing your money into the wind. Great.

For those who haven't, I highly encourage reading this item by Michael Hudson:

There is a long pedigree for this kind of behavior. And it always seems to involve a partnership between kleptocratic insiders and the Treasury. Today’s twist is that the banksters have lined up complicit accomplices from the accounting industry and bond-rating companies as well. The gang’s all here.

As for investing in stocks, make sure you choose a properly regulated and transparent market, which means none in the USA. I favor Oslo because the companies I like are listed there.

One of NCANS founding members has this "better plan to save the US economy," which I hope will generate some responses:

1.) Restore the dividends for FNM and FRE preferred stock. This will immediately improve the balance sheets of small, "innocent" community banks $ 10 to $ 15 billion.

2.) Abandon the warrants the Treasury extorted from FNM and FRE. If "real" common equity is worthless, the Treasury is giving up nothing. If "real" common equity has value, then the warrants represent theft of equity from the common holders, virtually none of whom had any control over FNM and FRE managements' activities.

3.) Immediately enact a Federal direct loan program, offering a new 30 year loan at 5% interest to any owner-occupant for the full amount of money currently due secured lenders on the home, without regard to income, equity, or credit score. In addition to the current interest charged, the Federal government gets 25% of a eventual sale price in excess of the original loan amount. This makes the program attractive only to those borrowers who actually need Federal assistance to keep their homes.

This program terminates virtually all foreclosures of owner-occupied homes, which should significantly stabilize most home prices in most areas of the country. This program removes the worst loans from lenders' balance sheets, allowing them to make new, better quality loans, and should unfreeze the credit markets.

This program helps "Main Street" directly, and should benefit Wall Street indirectly, rather than current proposals which benefit Wall Street directly, and do little or nothing for "Main Street".

All the Fed's alphabet soup of emergency liquidity facilities innovated over the past year were structured around repurchase agreements. Toxic waste securities were used as collateral for US Treasuries and dollar credit at 85 percent of face value. But as each facility expires, it has to be rolled over and increased to keep pace with the implosion of credit in the interbank markets.

This is correct. The Fed and the Treasury have misidentified and mischaracterized the nature of this crieis from the beginning, equating it to a garden variety 'money panic/liquidity squeeze'. Under such circumstances, the injections of Fed liquidity would be 'mopped up' after the panic had subsided ... and the Fed's balance sheet cleansed. In a money panic situation, the paper taken as collateral by the Fed in an open market operation would be good, but temporarily undervalued by the panic.

This crisis is a secular revaluation of assets. The paper taken by the Fed as collateral isn't good paper mis-valued ... it really is bad paper! After a year of crisis and bear markets in all forms of paper collateral ... the Fed's balance sheet is a mess.

A giant problem with the Paulson proposal is it will bring more bad paper out of the woodwork. $700b now, $1.2t next week, $5t the end of next year ... it will never end. All the banks - both in the US and abroad - are swimming in the stuff.

I disagree with the 'Base Money' scenario since it is an inflation plan. The Fed has plenty of subsidiaries - Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG come to mind - that can be converted into 'parking spaces' - holding companies for Fed waste. The Fed can replace the waste with more Treasuries and nobody would know. Bernanke could be doing this now, the only concern would be uncertainty over him keeping his job after January.

Restore the dividends for FNM and FRE preferred stock. This will immediately improve the balance sheets of small, "innocent" community banks $ 10 to $ 15 billion.

You have illustrated the core of the current crisis in one sentence! This is the lack of yield in all investments, particularly debt. 'Simple' return is insufficient, requiring excess leverage and complex intermediation. Instead of returns to savings/investments compounded over time with manageable risk, the markets have turned to 'growth' and speculation ... and complexity and intermediation to 'hedge' the unpredictable risk. Unfortunately, the decline of yield has taken decades to manifest itself and will not be solved overnight with a bailout.

The spark for Paulson's Plea was the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and the resulting shockwaves felt in the money markets. The common connection between all the failures is the derivatives markets: the CDS market which is leveraging debt downward (think 'Portfolio insurance') and the interest rate/cash flow swaps market. Trading, originating and settlements in these markets should be suspended until someone who has some insights into them can straigten them out. Doing this would calm the money markets and not cost the taxpayers a dime!

Don't visit my blog!

http://stevefromvirginia.blogspot.com/

Great analysis by Jerome. I'd add one thing, while this is a blatant theft by the banksters we still have no choice but to inflate the currency in some manner. There is such a massive overhang of current and future debt (social security, pensions, etc) that the only "solutions" are either default or monetization/hyperinflation. Paulson's plan does accomplish eventual hyperinflation but we get no benefit from it other than whatever crumbs dribble back to the general economy from the banks. The best plan IMO (now that we have completely gone over to socialism anyway) would be to spend the trillion or two on transition to a nuclear/renewable power grid. But too bad, we will kill our chances to do that now. By the time they finish printing up the first trillion or so for the banks, there won't be enough confidence left in the dollar to afford any useful infrastructure projects. If people understood the scale of this issue they would be in shock. We are looking at the last chance for America's future being given away to a handful of banking parasites - and it is happening right under everyone's noses. At the very least people reading this thread should be emailing their representatives. It takes less time than reading the thread. Don't let it be said that we went down without even an objection.