When you say (in your comment above) "I would encourage everyone reading this to send it to both the Minister for Climate Change and their local MP to highlight the problem of looking at climate change in isolation."
In my experience emails to politicians are usually ignored, particularly if you just copy and paste other stuff without telling them what you want. What I suggest is:
2. Explain to your MP that you applaud the Rudd Government's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, but that you believe merely establishing an ETS and leaving the "invisible hand of the market" to reduce emissions is completely inadequate. Tell him/her that you believe the situation requires urgent intervention.
3. Make some specific proposals for government expenditure in your area, e.g. public transport infrastructure or direct investment in renewable energy infrastructure. You could also suggest that existing fossil fuel subsidies totalling approximately $10 billion per annum be phased out and replaced with equivalent subsidies for renewable energy.
4. Explain that climate mitigation policies that ignore the socio-economic impact of peak oil will be ineffective. Explain that peak oil is even more urgent than climate change. If we don't get cracking with urgent peak oil mitigation we won't be able to afford to build the renewable energy and transport infrastructure we need, i.e. we will be stuck with what we've got.
5. Tell him/her that peak oil mitigation requires urgent action. Tinkering around the edges of the problem, i.e. subsidising Toyota to build hybrid cars is totally inadequate.
6. Include a copy of the Queensland Government's "Towards Oil Resilience" paper - http://www.epa.qld.gov.au/environmental_management/sustainability/oil_vu.... Tell him/her that the Federal Government needs to take its head out of the sand and follow Queensland's lead. All the better if you're a Queenslander.
7. Ask for an appointment to meet him/her face to face in order to explain peak oil and the resulting problems.
8. Send the same to the Ministers for Climate Change (Penny Wong), Energy (Martin Ferguson), Transport & Infrastructure (Anthony Albanese) and Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. Do not spam their email inboxes. Send them polite but insistent letters and or emails which explain the problem and ask for replies.
If you're really keen you can arrange a film night featuring Australia Pumping Empty - http://www.aquilaproductions.com.au/. Invite your local Federal & state MPs, local government Councillors and community groups. Don't wait for other people to do it for you, it will never happen. Rest assured that nothing will happen until real leaders "ave a go" and do this sort of thing on their own initiative.
Let me know how you go. TOD could be a good forum for posting emails and replies to/from politicians.
Thanks for crafting such a high quality posting, and providing helpful instructions on how we should make best use of your hard work. Your letter does a great job of pushing peak oil back onto the discussion agenda. Back in April Ian Dunlop, myself and others built our various Garnaut submissions around peak oil messages, but none of us seems to have succeeded in influencing the outputs of the Garnaut enquiry as far as I can see. Taking a second shot at the target seems a very good idea.
If I could make a suggestion, simplify your case down to the barest essentials (oil supply forecast is wrong, thus any climate change policy coming from it is wrong as well). Wait till the report is due to hit the press and then send out a press release with the simple message and links to a nice simple pretty graph just before the report release (eg night before).
Journalists are always looking for the story and you have a good chance of getting coverage from someone or other. Remember, essentially write the story for them, in the style journalists tend to use.
You would be amazed how well that works.
Oh, and the report will be reviewed by politicians, find the name of one who is contrarian and feed them questions that will make them look on the ball.
Hi Stuart,
Great article.
When you say (in your comment above) "I would encourage everyone reading this to send it to both the Minister for Climate Change and their local MP to highlight the problem of looking at climate change in isolation."
Do you mean just copy past and email off????
Cheers,
Matt
Matt,
In my experience emails to politicians are usually ignored, particularly if you just copy and paste other stuff without telling them what you want. What I suggest is:
1. Write a letter to your local MP and include a copy of our original letter above (http://www.aspo-australia.org.au/References/Bruce/Letter-Garnaut-Sep-200...). You can email if you like but letters are usually more successful.
2. Explain to your MP that you applaud the Rudd Government's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, but that you believe merely establishing an ETS and leaving the "invisible hand of the market" to reduce emissions is completely inadequate. Tell him/her that you believe the situation requires urgent intervention.
3. Make some specific proposals for government expenditure in your area, e.g. public transport infrastructure or direct investment in renewable energy infrastructure. You could also suggest that existing fossil fuel subsidies totalling approximately $10 billion per annum be phased out and replaced with equivalent subsidies for renewable energy.
4. Explain that climate mitigation policies that ignore the socio-economic impact of peak oil will be ineffective. Explain that peak oil is even more urgent than climate change. If we don't get cracking with urgent peak oil mitigation we won't be able to afford to build the renewable energy and transport infrastructure we need, i.e. we will be stuck with what we've got.
5. Tell him/her that peak oil mitigation requires urgent action. Tinkering around the edges of the problem, i.e. subsidising Toyota to build hybrid cars is totally inadequate.
6. Include a copy of the Queensland Government's "Towards Oil Resilience" paper - http://www.epa.qld.gov.au/environmental_management/sustainability/oil_vu.... Tell him/her that the Federal Government needs to take its head out of the sand and follow Queensland's lead. All the better if you're a Queenslander.
7. Ask for an appointment to meet him/her face to face in order to explain peak oil and the resulting problems.
8. Send the same to the Ministers for Climate Change (Penny Wong), Energy (Martin Ferguson), Transport & Infrastructure (Anthony Albanese) and Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. Do not spam their email inboxes. Send them polite but insistent letters and or emails which explain the problem and ask for replies.
If you're really keen you can arrange a film night featuring Australia Pumping Empty - http://www.aquilaproductions.com.au/. Invite your local Federal & state MPs, local government Councillors and community groups. Don't wait for other people to do it for you, it will never happen. Rest assured that nothing will happen until real leaders "ave a go" and do this sort of thing on their own initiative.
Let me know how you go. TOD could be a good forum for posting emails and replies to/from politicians.
Cheers,
Stuart
Stuart,
Thanks for crafting such a high quality posting, and providing helpful instructions on how we should make best use of your hard work. Your letter does a great job of pushing peak oil back onto the discussion agenda. Back in April Ian Dunlop, myself and others built our various Garnaut submissions around peak oil messages, but none of us seems to have succeeded in influencing the outputs of the Garnaut enquiry as far as I can see. Taking a second shot at the target seems a very good idea.
Cheers, Mark
If I could make a suggestion, simplify your case down to the barest essentials (oil supply forecast is wrong, thus any climate change policy coming from it is wrong as well). Wait till the report is due to hit the press and then send out a press release with the simple message and links to a nice simple pretty graph just before the report release (eg night before).
Journalists are always looking for the story and you have a good chance of getting coverage from someone or other. Remember, essentially write the story for them, in the style journalists tend to use.
You would be amazed how well that works.
Oh, and the report will be reviewed by politicians, find the name of one who is contrarian and feed them questions that will make them look on the ball.