207 comments on The Borg: A Financial Allegory
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
207 comments on The Borg: A Financial Allegory
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“This order [i.e. capitalism] is now bound to the technical and economic conditions of machine production which today determine the lives of all the individuals who are born into this mechanism, not only those directly concerned with the economic acquisition, with irresistible force. Perhaps it will so determine them until the last ton of fossilized coal is burnt.”
—Max Weber, 1905
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Take away thought: Does the current monetary system serve us, or are we slaves to it?
Yet another insightful article, Gail.
I don't deserve credit on this article. The work was Jason's, and several other of TOD staff reviewed it and provided input, including Nate and Ace. I did the HTML and a bit of final editing.
Does the current monetary system serve us, or are we slaves to it?
Do you believe in the illuminati, New World Order? The creature from Jekyll Island?
Or...
"Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence." - Robert J. Hanlon (though perhaps Heinlein or even Goethe)
Nevertheless, we are all born into it, and have been for at least 300 years, which gives an idea of the probability of changing it for the better.
I've always heard that notion attributed to Napoleon. But in honor of Heinlein, I offer the corollary:
"Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice."
oh, I like that and with permission. will spread it.
I think the point of "not ascribing to malice" is that it is much better for one's own mental health, and thus leading to a more positive state of mind w.r.t. adressing a problem.
If one ascribes something to malice then one is creating an additional problem to deal with. Namely, one has the tendency to take things personally when one perceives them to be the consequence of bad intent. One then has additional personal issues to deal with, rather than deal with the actual problem at hand in a detached, objective and constructive way.
The statement to me, therefore, is about how we personally *chose* to perceive/interpret a situation.
So your corrololary essentially turns the statement upside down.
Let me put it this way. The following two statement seem logical equivalent:
However, there is a world of difference in the direction of the implied choice of one subjective point of view over another.
Clarke
Nice call -- the corollary above does seem to pattern after Arthur C. Clarke's third law better: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
I've always been partial to Salvor Hardin's saying: "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." In context here, what would that be, perhaps: "Bailouts are the last refuge of the incompetent."
Do you believe in the illuminati, New World Order? The creature from Jekyll Island?
Is something a conspiracy if it is done out in the open?
Perhaps the cancer is that sociopaths are running things.
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/3066
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/37751
(and if the nutters are running things, how does one determine who is or is not worthy of your support? Where is the social rating network for who's a sociopath?)
Although this isn't the best place to discuss things like the Illuminati, Freemasonry, conspiracies, or similar things... there is a lot of evidence proving the existence of these things.
No less than David Rockefeller blatantly admits that his goal in life is to promote a one world government. I'm not saying that a one world government is a bad thing in and of itself. Instead the evidence is that the people promoting these agendas at a high level have malicious intentions and will push forward their ideas at nearly any cost to the general public (aka "cattle").
When you look at the various secret societies and think tank organizations (CFR, Bilderberg, PNAC, etc.), there is a great deal of reliable information about their membership and agendas. It's rather eerie to find out the big names in business, government, and media who are part of these organizations. However, TOD tends to be more scientifically oriented and from what I've seen there are only a small percentage of members who have taken the time to delve deeply into these subjects. Perhaps people are afraid of being labeled kooks.
I agree fully with your observation. I think the "enemy within" angle is one that is frequently forgotten in discussions on how messed up our societies have become. Myself, I was quite naïve about this until I had a stint in the corporate environment (the natural habitat of the sociopath).
One suggestion to the Oil Drum editors: try to get a psychologist to write a guest article on sociopaths. Hopefully it will be an eye-opener for many people.
Energy flow is the key to all activity on earth. Economics is a book keeping system, a way of using an abstraction such as money to allocate available energy and resources. If the public can be kept ignorant of means of the bookkeeping the bookkeepers will be king of a mass of ignorant slaves. Money is the means and the end is control.
"[T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country, and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion, by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.
The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks, which were themselves, private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control, and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups."
~Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (New York: Macmillan, 1966) p.324
If you wish to believe it was just happenstance that it turned out this way that is your choice. The modern global finacial system and "globalization" in general represents exactly what Rome stood for but on a global scale. It offers the least "happiness" to the greatest number of people.
“America is today the leader of a world-wide anti-revolutionary movement in the defense of vested interests. She now stands for what Rome stood for. Rome consistently supported the rich against the poor in all foreign communities that fell under her sway; and, since the poor, so far, have always and everywhere been far more numerous than the rich, Rome's policy made for inequality, for injustice, and for the least happiness of the greatest number.”
~Arnold Toynbee, 1961
Since most of us who have access to computers and an education are amongst the lower tiers of the “rich” it is hard to gaze out into the world with unfettered eyes. The fact remains that the “wealth” we now posses has been stolen; our civilization has been built with military power and conquest and there are no signs of changing that course.
“What we call progress is a mysterious marriage of creativity and plunder. Civilization has flowered when human beings have devised ingenious new ways to organize production and social life, but such organization has usually been accomplished with stolen goods…. Under girding [its] extraordinary achievements in art philosophy, literature, and statecraft [are] military power and conquest.”
~Richard J Barnet
As we collectively head down the road of diminishing returns any and all arguments will be conceived to maintain the current state of wide spread inequality. All the arguments will be thinly veiled lies carefully crafted to work in the favor of the global capital Empire.
"Wherever men hold unequal power in society, they will strive to maintain it. They will use whatever means are convenient to that end and will seek to justify them by the most plausible arguments they are able to devise."
~Reinhold Neibuhr
==Angry Chimp
Great Post, AngryChimp! Keep it coming.
Energy flow is the key to all activity on earth. Economics is a book keeping system, a way of using an abstraction such as money to allocate available energy and resources.
And so is eMergy.
True but Odum’s eMergy is based on real values, i.e. solar energy, unlike “money” which is just printed with no relationship to a natural energy value.
I would not be surprised to see a play at an integrated, global governing body come out of all this. Fear can do a lot to making people bend to the "only" option available.
From what you state above, you could currently argue there is already one integrated entity running the global financial machine.
"From what you state above, you could currently argue there is already one integrated entity running the global financial machine."
I would argue that there is an affiliation of different groups/families running the financial machine. The question is how tight is this affiliation? Nietzsche wrote long ago:
“…every specific body strives to become master over all space and to extend its force and to thrust back all that resists its extension. But it continually encounters similar efforts on the part of other bodies and ends by coming to an arrangement with those of them that are sufficiently related to it: thus they then conspire together for power.”
In the journey of increasing net energy even former powerful enemies would unite as they conspire together to increase their power. The rub lies in a world of decreasing net energy will this formation of different groups brought together by the desire of power fragment once again and begin to fight amongst each other for their piece of the ever shrinking energy pie?
==AC
thats the paradox of materialism. . what else are we slaves to?
"what else are we slaves to?"
We are slaves to our own ignorance…
“Each person “has” an idea of the absolutely real, the highest good, the greatest power: he may not have this idea consciously, in fact he rarely does. The idea grows out of the automatic conditioning of his early learning; he “lives” his version of the real without knowing it, by giving his whole uncritical allegiance to some kind of model of power. So long as he does this he is truly a slave; not only is he unconsciously living a slavish life but he is deluding himself too: he thinks he is living on a model of the true absolute, the really real, when actually he is living a second-rate real, a fetish of truth, an idol of power.”
~Becker, “The Birth and Death of Meaning”