214 comments on Organic Agriculture Is Better Than Industrial Agriculture
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
214 comments on Organic Agriculture Is Better Than Industrial Agriculture
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The infrastructure of suburbia can be described as the greatest misallocation of resources in the history of the world.”
—JH Kunstler
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
There are a lot of jobs that people do that I don't particularly want to do - I've done a bunch of them. I've stood in one place doing retail sales, unable to move more than step, unable to stretch a muscle and felt my back seize up. I've lifted elderly people onto toilets and back to bed all day long, often lifting people much heavier than I was, because there was no one free to help me and their needs had to be met. I've unloaded shipping crates and lifted their contents onto shelves above my head for 6 straight hours. A lot of people do physical labor in the US, and worse jobs than farming. I've done several of them, and I find the time I spend cutting thistles pleasant compared to my memories of nursing home work.
It isn't always fun - especially when you get paid badly and work in terrible conditions, but those are your additions to the narrative, not mine, and they aren't inevitable. We're going to be using what resources we do have for something - yes, we'll have less money to go around, but we'll be spending what we do have on some things. I suppose it is possible to imagine that we'll give up food and go on buying other stuff, but me, I'd bet we'll be looking for food. That is, agriculture is the wildly underpaid sector it is in part because of fossil fuels. Take them out, and food (and its production) become more valuable.
The problem, of course, is making such a shift sooner, rather than later - Cuba's agricultural shift, for example, happened after everyone was already hungry and lost 20lbs - Russia's happened in crisis. In that case, you have several options. One is to subsidize and enable small farms - large gardens and small farms using existing housing on large lots (often very good farmland) and larger plots. That makes it possible for people to do this work for the same reasons you were willing - to contribute to the well-being of their family. Another possibility would be to artificially subsidize agricultural wages, turning agriculture into a decent job. You might not take it, but millions of people doing McJobs and heavy physical work with repetetive strain injuries might not find decently managed agricultural work intolerable. There are other options - it is hard to condense nearly 400 pages into 5 or so ;-). But I don't think one of the choices we're recommending is slavery.
Sharon
"There are a lot of jobs that people do that I don't particularly want to do " and you've made a good list of them. But for me farm worker definitely ranks among them and it didn't take me very long doing that to conclude (1) it's not a way I want to live and (2) it doesn't seem to sensible to live off of other people living that way. So, small farms - yes, small down to the size of gardens, I say. But we need to bring up the issue of social security. Without some form of centralized social security it's every family for itself and the larger the family, the better the chance of making it in old age. I've read of and figured out many versions of Utopia but without addressing the population question they all crash. To those who claim that unfair distribution is the real problem, the reply is (1) fairer distribution is not about to happen and (2) if it did it would be a temporary solution.
My daughter lives on a commune/farm in W Va. They have goats, various fowl, a few cows, horses, and a large garden with plenty of room to expand. Recently they've taken up canning. The live very comfortably, but use a teeny fraction of the resources the same number of people in suburbia would use. Although, they are not self-sufficient, they are positioned to get a lot closer to it.
When I think of farm labor, I think of the way they live on this commune. One doesn't have to be simply a low-wage farm hand. I think it's far better, far more fun to a member of some kind of collective where farming is but one of your labors, and where you participate in deciding how to make it work.
As far hard work, I was a truck driver for 11 years, til I was 36, long, long ago. Hard, hard work loading and unloading box cars, loading my truck, running around three states delivering office furniture, carrying desks up flights of stairs, duking it out with other drivers who jumped the line at the packing houses on the waterfront in NYC, and so forth. Some of the best years of working life. Hard physical work is not to be afraid of, especially if you have some control of it and if you can lighten it up as you get older.
None of this matters, however. There's not going to be any choice about it. It's the future. It doesn't matter how much anyone hates it. The adjustment is going to have to be made. The era when everyone could sell real estate, process claims, design web pages or just walk around a warehouse guarding against "terrorists" is rapidly coming to a close. And its not a matter of re-industrializing either. That too cannot happen on a major scale. One way or another it's back to the land and small industry connected with it. People don't like biking or walking too much either. SO SORRY!
BTW, I'm a total city-slicker (although I walk everywhere, except to get out of the city to go hiking). But I know this ain't future. I used to hate visiting my grandfather's farm as a kid, getting up in the middle of the nite, like 5 or whatever, listening to some idiot fowl howling. But my daughter's commune/farm plus the recognition of necessity has changed my mind. Trouble is, I'm at the age now where all I'll be able to contribute is fertilizer, one way or another.
Ah yes, upthread there was talk of night-soil. What about buckets? Carry it out to the fields. That's what they used to do in China, probably still do.
Sorry for not being clearer. I was talking about earning money along side the farm workers that harvest so much of the food we all eat. Has your daughter tried to earn a living in that way? If you or she tried it, I think neither you would be so rhapsodical about it.
Doom and Gloom, you don't get it. As soon as you say "tried to earn a living" I know you don't get it. You're living in the unreal world where everything you do and everything you consume has a price. What is the price of being off the economy? Priceless!
Two of us have lived for a decade on about $12,000 to $14,000 a year. The IRS keeps hounding us, because they don't understand how people can live that way. How do we do it? For starters, we don't buy plastic crap from China, we don't pay rent -- to a landlord or a bank (if you have a mortgage, you're just a renter), we produce 2/3rds of our own energy, and close to half our food.
If your goal is to live a good life with as little money as possible, it's amazing how easy it is. You just have to kick your addiction to money.
Well, of course that was the main point of my post above. Before you guys go getting all utopia dreaming of everyone outstanding in their fields, you'd better address the present tendency for concentrated wealth to capture every activity with any potential to increase it, and agriculture tops the list. My point was that there will be some social engineering required before I'll get back to anywhere near participating in anything like a majority of working society employed full time in manual labour agriculture.