![]() | Energy Debate Fact Check #2 - Is Energy Independence Good For the Nation? | The Oil Drum | Organic Agriculture Is Better Than Industrial Agriculture | ![]() |
257 comments on DrumBeat: October 16, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
257 comments on DrumBeat: October 16, 2008
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Any energy source would be the same, I would think. Energy functions as Maxwell's Demon, to decrease randomness--and increase "wealth" for whoever controls it and increases randomness--and increase "misery" for everyone else.
Energy sources that are less concentrated, like solar energy, should be more "democratic" than concentrated sources because they are more difficult to corral by a ruling class. I imagine that is why solar power has been largely discouraged. Not because it is "expensive", but because it is harder to "administer" and "manage."
Only if you can't store it.
Life became a lot less egalitarian once we started growing food that could be stored: grain.
Ahah! That is how you control sunlight energy. Develop a priesthood to manage agricultural land and water resources, then grain storage and a writing system (just for the priests) to "manage" it all. Before petroleum there was grain and olive oil and wine.
It's still more democratic, because it is still harder to centralize. However -- if you can make agriculture dependent on petroleum -- well, there you have it all.
I dunno. The life of a medieval serf doesn't seem like it was very democratic to me.
thanks!!!!!
What I needed!
And now, with video!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
Livestock "on the hoof" is also a great way to "store" food until it is needed.
Don't forget the greatest invention of all: Beer. One can imagine a brand new but leaky clay storage vessel straight from the (wood or charcoal-fired) kiln. It is clean enough to start brewing after a good summer downpour. Next, the pleasant revelations, the visionary haze, the incredibly bad decisions and the ensuing headache that results in a brand new urban culture. Let's call it chip-chop...
The "keep" was originally the place where grain and other food was stored. Obviously, it doubles as a watchtower. The food surplus from agriculture leads to the first civilization, and it's all based on accumulation and specialization. Armies, walls, rulers' tombs and monuments first. Slaves, horses and camels next. The GOP's brand new agenda goes back a very long way.
Agreed. So It's really tough to 'sell' the idea of these very helpful BB's to our neighbors as we continue to reminisce over the age of Muscle Cars and Unlimited Energy.
A producer I work with has proposed making an 'Energy Show' to me today, but I'm trying to unspin some of his expectations of paying for it with the involvement of various Energy Companies that would be profiled and hence, promoted with the program. Even if its Green Energy and essentially positive, it's still ALL pointing towards Bigger Stone Heads, as Leanan would say. Who pays for an episode on 'Negawatts' (Amory Lovins and Grants, perhaps) .. It's not unsolvable, but it's life in a system where the ideas that can get airtime are the ones that have profit-motive behind them.
It reminds me of the arguments the other day about whether 'debt' is money or not. As an artist, I call it 'negative space', as an electrician, I might call it the 'return path' for the current. In terms of our energy use, the power we DON'T use is the essential balance to the energy we DO use.. and the things that DON'T make money are, similarly, a fully essential counterpart to that which fits in the marketplace.
"Who will buy this wonderful Morning?..." -Oliver Twist
I don't know where you are based, but here in Minnesota utilities are now mandated to reduce energy consumption. They are scrambling to find ways to talk consumers into using less. Maybe he should pitch the idea here?
Here in Nebraska, the utilities are also looking for ways to get customers to use less, primarily by becoming more efficient. Course the difference here, compare to the other 49 states is electricity here is a public utility. I find it kind of nice that an investor's profit is not involved.
Funny, we tried to pitch the same kind of show to Discovery Channel as a spin-off to Discovery Planet. They'd have nothing of it. The show was to feature a producer on a stationary bicycle powering the monitor. Free lunches sell a lot better than farming.