We have actually tried to do that (hire retired engineers as faculty) but not with a lot of success. It continues to be very difficult to find, let alone recruit good folk for faculty positions in the extractive fuels business (mining, nuclear petroleum). At the same time it is becoming very difficult to find good qualified graduate students, and the American industry has not had a good history of supporting meaningful research at Universities, which compounds both problems. Add to which my class sizes are about doubling (one of the reasons I am no longer as controversial) and you may realize why those of us getting up to about that age aren't thinking as much of more teaching, but rather of the wood stove, and the hot chocolate, and the gentle music of violins in the background.

The lack of good graduate students is critical--especially a few years down the line when we will need to dramatically increase the number of engineers that we are educating.

Forty or more years ago, when I was in the MBA program at U.C., Berkeley, we had a number of engineers in the program. They were tired of being second class citizens and wanted to move up into management, where they would get more money and a lot more respect.

During the first half of the twentieth century engineers had a lot of status, and many boys (and a few girls) dreamed about becoming engineers; they were the heroes of science fiction stories in the forties and the fifties. Indeed, "Astounding Science Fiction" was written largely by, for, and about engineers in an exciting future.

But since the end of the sixties, finance and law have been the prestige areas--as a result of which we have hundreds of thousands of useless parasitic lawyers and similar numbers of MBAs in finance; these are the people who drove great banks and brokerage houses into the ground.

My guess is that we will have to import huge numbers of engineers, because we are not producing anywhere near enough of them in the U.S.

hundreds of thousands of useless parasitic lawyers and similar numbers of MBAs in finance

You say "parasite" like it's a bad thing. Remember, parasitism is one of the more successful forms of mutualism; a certain percentage of humans are always trying to "achieve" this form. A lot of "religious workers" are just as parasitic as MBAs and lawyers.

parasitism is one of the more successful forms of mutualism

Parasitism and mutualism are mutually exclusive; parasitism harms the host, mutualism helps both.

A lot of "religious workers" are just as parasitic as MBAs and lawyers.

I don't see much use for religion, but churches haven't managed to worm themselves into every corner of business and trade the way the MBAs and lawyers have.

Parasitism and mutualism are mutually exclusive; parasitism harms the host, mutualism helps both.

If we look at parasitism among lifeforms, it often evolves into something resembling mutualism. I think the distinction is not so clear cut. Even some forms that look like pure parasitism, can sometimes be observed to help the host -perhaps only in unusual circumstances. The parasites may defend the host against an occasional external threat. In any case, it is in the interest of the parasite, that the host survive, and possibly even prosper. So even for initially pure parasitic relationships in human societies, and not just in nature, there exists the possibility to negotiate a more cooperative relationship.