FFS.

Would you like to tell me which fertilisers come directly from *oil*. Not natural gas, but oil?

Would you like to tell me just what percentage of oil goes into your laundary list of other products - is the entire output of Gwahar required for the pill? Would oil increasing in price by a factor of 100 affect the manifacturing costs of condoms much?

And, of course, how many of these uses are absolutely non-substitutable, even given that negative EROEI oil sources are prefectly OK as a source of industrial feedstocks?

Have you put even the slightest thought into this subject? Learned any science outside of the Offifial Doomer Line (tm)?

Subsitiution of static Oil and Gas use (Heating, some electric and feedstocks) is a relatively trivial problem to fix; Nuclear power with climate-appropriate renewable contributions can fix this on century-plus timescales. Substitution of transport varies in difficulty; most commuting a local travel can be substituted with EVs with current technology; Air travel and long distance haulage are the harder problems.. but we'll have enough oil for them for decades to come.

There is no particular reason why we need fast growth, this is not the requirement for debt repayment as commonly asserted here (you forget inflation).

Try to be critical of anything you read that agrees with what you already think.

I think there are alternatives to growth and it is not a case of affluence or death.
Ask the 36.4 million people below the poverty line in the US.