It may be different where you are, but around here (until relatively recently), commuters bought the biggest vehicle they could afford. The traffic is packed with big crew cab pickups and SUVs with one commuter occupant and no company logo. No fighter jets or motor homes are used as commuters in my area, perhaps you live in an unusual locale. So I made a choice not to purchase a truck, and based my comparison on these parameters.

At 150k miles, I assume the SUV/Pickup is pretty much on it's last legs, so any analysis would need to show the purchase of another vehicle. 1990 CRX-HF was not available when I bought my car. My analysis showed that I assuming an average of $4/gal, I had saved over $41K. Sure, gas is down now, but I don't think there are many here who would believe it to last very long at that price, and certainly not 10-15 years (unless they are from CERA).

It may be different where you are, but around here (until relatively recently), commuters bought the biggest vehicle they could afford. The traffic is packed with big crew cab pickups and SUVs with one commuter occupant and no company logo. No fighter jets or motor homes are used as commuters in my area, perhaps you live in an unusual locale. So I made a choice not to purchase a truck, and based my comparison on these parameters.

You're honestly going to pretend that the decision for you was between the jumbo SUV and the Insight? If no Insight was available you wouldn't have looked at a Mazda 3 or a Toyota Corolla? Please.

At 150k miles, I assume the SUV/Pickup is pretty much on it's last legs

Depends on the same factors (make/model/etc) that impact smaller cars. You certainly could buy a reliable SUV if that was on your list. And again... 150k could easily be the lifespan of the Insight. My brother has one and it hasn't been bulletproof.

1990 CRX-HF was not available when I bought my car.

Oh please (again). There was most certainly a reliable used small car available with a tiny engine that got an mpg significantly closer to the hybrid than to the Suburban and for a small fraction of the cost of a new Insight.

My analysis showed that I assuming an average of $4/gal, I had saved over $41K

Then your "analysis" was a con game you played on yourself to justify the expense. That's ok... it's how car salesmen have made a living for decades. You spent more than you would have on some alternatives and justififed it to yourself based on some inflated calculation of what you would save.

, gas is down now, but I don't think there are many here who would believe it to last very long at that price

It did the last time this happened.

There was most certainly a reliable used small car available with a tiny engine that got an mpg significantly closer to the hybrid than to the Suburban and for a small fraction of the cost of a new Insight

An examination of the cost of used vehicles in the year 2000 and their life expectancies is something that perhaps you would like to undertake; I simply showed the difference between the choice a large number of commuters were making and what I made.

, gas is down now, but I don't think there are many here who would believe it to last very long at that price

It did the last time this happened.

You may choose to believe that gas prices won't go up again for a long time, but the whole purpose of TOD is to alert people to the peaking in oil production and the effect it will have on price, so that we can understand the effect our consumption choices will have on the economy and our own financial wellbeing.

Hence, I stand by my original statement; "In looking at the big picture, Americans have wasted small fortunes on trivial luxuries and failed to invest in intelligent choices."