129 comments on A National Renewable Ammonia Architecture
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
129 comments on A National Renewable Ammonia Architecture
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
- An interview with Stoneleigh - the case for deflation
- The Future of European Transport: iTREN-2030
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“So one may almost say that the theory of universal suffrage assumes that the Average Citizen is an active, instructed, intelligent ruler of his country. The facts contradict this assumption.”
—James Bryce (1909, 35)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
7,900 2.5 megawatt turbines is a lot of turbines. That is the size currently being put up around our farm. They are huge and I believe they cost about 2.5 million each. The 180 turbines cover an area that I would estimate to be well over 50 square miles.
At 2.5 million each the cost would be 19.75 billion. Having watched construction all last summer and even now of the Crystal Lake wind farm, 7,900 would be a major, major project. Construction of 43 more of this size wind farm boggles the mind.
Many farmers over apply nitrogen. A lot is lost in fall application in my opinion and early application in the spring can also disappear if there is a lot of rain. 170 pounds is way too much for a 154 bushel yield.
The rule of thumb is one pound of nitrogen per bushel of corn. But if crop rotation is practiced, and it usually is, soybeans add about 1 pound of nitrogen for each bushel of beans produced. On my farm that's about 50 pounds per acre. So I put on 125 pounds of nitrogen in the form of urea just before planting. The yield this fall was about 170 bushels of corn per acre. Urea was the only fertilizer I used because of high prices this year.
No doubt corn yields would drop dramatically without nitrogen application, but I doubt they would drop by half if crop rotation is used. Also spreading hog manure is a big deal around here as a source of nitrogen. I hate it because of the stench. But with so many hog factories nearby it is a significant source of nitrogen.
I had hopes some hog factories would shut down because of high corn prices, but few do. They seem to keep going and just absorb the losses.
Wind turbines don't need two hundred acres each :-) I believe they want either three or seven blade lengths between them, beyond that it's about micrositing. A slight rise can dramatically increase ... or decrease yield, if some skill is not applied to the final location selection.
I'm going to defer to Bryan Lutter on the fertilizer points - he is a professional agronomist and he should be along shortly.